Salesforce CEO says 50% of company work is now done by AI

midian182

Posts: 10,794   +142
Staff member
What just happened? Not every company is slowing down its rush to go all-in on AI – Salesforce certainly isn't. According to CEO Marc Benioff, up to 50% of work being done at the software giant is now performed by AI. Benioff had plenty of praise for the technology, but said little about how it will impact those it puts out of work.

Speaking in an interview on Bloomberg's The Circuit with Emily Chang, Benioff said "All of us have to get our head around this idea that AI could do things, that before, we were doing, and we can move on to do higher-value work." He revealed that about 30% to 50% of work being done at the company is now performed by AI.

Salesforce announced earlier this year that it was laying off 1,000 people as a result of its AI focus, something Benioff seems less keen to highlight. According to reports, the company will be hiring 1,000 extra people whose job will be to sell Salesforce's AI agent tech, Agentforce, to other firms, who will likely use it to replace some of their own workers. Benioff said the agents can perform tasks at around 93% accuracy.

Benioff isn't the only CEO to reveal how much company work AI is responsible for. CEO Satya Nadella recently said around 30% of Microsoft's code is now written by an AI, while Sundar Pichai said the figure was 25% at Google.

But some executives' stance toward AI has cooled recently, usually due to a public backlash against the technology. Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn previously said the firm would gradually stop using contractors to do work AI can handle, and that proficiency with the technology would become part of workers' annual reviews. But von Ahn said in May that he could not see AI replacing employees.

Klarna is another example of this trend. In 2023, CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski told OpenAI boss Sam Altman "I want Klarna to be your favorite guinea pig." The buy-now, pay-later firm has slashed it workforce by almost half in recent years and announced a freeze on hiring in December 2023 as it looked to pursue AI alternatives to humans.

Siemiatkowski changed his position in May, announcing that Klarna would once again be hiring humans as the AI replacements were producing a "lower-quality" output.

Ultimately, though, the mass job losses that many predicted would be caused by AI are happening, with Microsoft the latest to announce thousands of cuts as it invests $80 billion in AI. According to layoffs.fyi, 63,823 people from 150 tech companies have been laid off in 2025 so far.

Image credit: World Economic Forum

Permalink to story:

 
People who are in denial about AI, will face major headwind.

When AI is going to be tailored to manage customized business processes, it will be over for the white collar job.

The first bunch of jobs that I could see going away really soon are HR and Translators.

Ironically, AI will drive salaries down because fewer jobs will be available and candidates will be willing to make some major concessions for a salary. As I am replaying Cyberpunk right now, I can't stop thinking of the dystopian view of corporation's influence in the game leading humanity to modern slavery.
 
Last edited:
There are too many people who simply cannot do "higher value work."
What this man says is a polite way to say that they will soon be
forced to do the work of such low value that it will be pointless to use AI and automatization on.

 
The real **** will hit the fan when these CEOs will stumble upon a problem of nobody buying their stuff as nobody getting a livable wage.
 
The real **** will hit the fan when these CEOs will stumble upon a problem of nobody buying their stuff as nobody getting a livable wage.
that wont happen until the venture capitalists run out of money, and as long as the banks keep giving it to them then that will never happen
 
Still not able to get anything approaching a 25%-50% time saved out of assigning tasks to AI (typically fullstack development for web apps.) I keep trying in the name of staying current and understanding what's possible, but it hasn't been there for me yet. My last two tasks it got a 0% on - a visual recognition task it repeatedly promised it could do (so far as naming outputs program_FINAL or program_FULLY_WORKING none of which ever did) and what should have been a rote transformation of one lengthy data structure to another format, both of which I had to take over after giving it many repeated attempts with feedback each time.

But I guess if you count all the lines of code that AI has proposed via autocompletion and that I've deleted soon after, it might approach those percentages of total code entering (but not leaving) my IDE.

It also has a big problem particularly with tech tasks of not being current enough. OpenAI's models were trained on data as of the end of 2023. When you ask tech questions it often ignores everything that has happened in 2024 and 2025 leading it to give high confidence yet totally wrong answers as to anything that was added or changed in later versions of major software packages.
 
Back