What I don't lik is that he is using a Tombraider game from three years ago, a shooter from two and a half years ago and a racegame from a year and a half ago for a benchmark that will advice gamers in 2019. For example, AMD performs much better in Battlefield V vs Nvidia then it does in Battlefield 1. And in 2019 more people will buy Battlefield 5 instead of Battlefield 1. And since Battlefield 1 is 33% of his performance conclusion, his entire advice is useless for gamers in 2019.
Apparently You're not aware of recent Battlefield V controversy. People are not buying this game out of spite for EA for rewriting history, looking down at fans That critisized It, and finally calling Them uneducated.
On a technical note, both games are created mainly for current gen consoles. Should perform on par, after patched and optimised.
And It's really sad state of affairs with nGreedia monopoly that major tech outlet as Techspot must advice readers what used card to buy to upgrade over their 4 year old GTX960 or 970 to feel that They upgraded.
Right now I'm bent on keeping my 970 as long as possible. It's in the middle of the first chart (one might call it mid-tier card). Don't play that much anymore anyway.