TSMC's 2nm wafer prices hit $30,000 as SRAM yields reportedly hit 90%

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,920   +53
Staff
In context: TSMC has steadily raised the prices of its most advanced semiconductor process nodes over the past several years – so much so that one analysis suggests the cost per transistor hasn't decreased in over a decade. Further price hikes, driven by tariffs and rising development costs, are reinforcing the notion that Moore's Law is truly dead.

The Commercial Times reports that TSMC's upcoming N2 2nm semiconductors will cost $30,000 per wafer, a roughly 66% increase over the company's 3nm chips. Future nodes are expected to be even more expensive and likely reserved for the largest manufacturers.

TSMC has justified these price increases by citing the massive cost of building 2nm fabrication plants, which can reach up to $725 million. According to United Daily News, major players such as Apple, AMD, Qualcomm, Broadcom, and Nvidia are expected to place orders before the end of the year despite the higher prices, potentially bringing TSMC's 2nm Arizona fab to full capacity.

Also see: How profitable are TSMC's nodes: crunching the numbers

Unsurprisingly, Apple is getting first dibs. The A20 processor in next year's iPhone 18 Pro is expected to be the first chip based on TSMC's N2 process. Intel's Nova Lake processors, targeting desktops and possibly high-end laptops, are also slated to use N2 and are expected to launch next year.

Earlier reports indicated that yield rates for TSMC's 2nm process reached 60% last year and have since improved. New data suggests that 256Mb SRAM yield rates now exceed 90%. Trial production is likely already underway, with mass production scheduled to begin later this year.

With tape-outs for 2nm-based designs surpassing previous nodes at the same development stage, TSMC aims to produce tens of thousands of wafers by the end of 2025.

TSMC also plans to follow N2 with N2P and N2X in the second half of next year. N2P is expected to offer an 18% performance boost over N3E at the same power level and 36% greater energy efficiency at the same speed, along with significantly higher logic density. N2X, slated for mass production in 2027, will increase maximum clock frequencies by 10%.

As semiconductor geometries continue to shrink, power leakage becomes a major concern. TSMC's 2nm nodes will address this issue with gate-all-around (GAA) transistor architectures, enabling more precise control of electrical currents.

Beyond 2nm lies the Angstrom era, where TSMC will implement backside power delivery to further enhance performance. Future process nodes like A16 (1.6nm) and A14 (1.4nm) could cost up to $45,000 per wafer.

Meanwhile, Intel is aiming to outpace TSMC's roadmap. The company recently began risk production of its A18 node, which also features gate-all-around and backside power delivery. These chips are expected to debut later this year in Intel's upcoming laptop CPUs, codenamed Panther Lake.

Permalink to story:

 
While im thankful that TSMC had made this type of progress, im frustrated that it is ONLY TSMC. The monopoly they have let's them charge whatever they want to whoever they want. They could end a companies ability to be competitive just be refusing to do business with them.


And I know, Chinese companies are making great strides, but they're still basically still behind Intel at this point. Best thing they have going for them is they are cheap.

Im sure plenty of people would be perfectly happy dealing with a 600watt card that gives 4090 level of performance if it actually did cost $500.

There isn't anything stopping anyone from making that card aside from node stigma.
 
And I know, Chinese companies are making great strides, but they're still basically still behind Intel at this point. Best thing they have going for them is they are cheap.

Im sure plenty of people would be perfectly happy dealing with a 600watt card that gives 4090 level of performance if it actually did cost $500.

There isn't anything stopping anyone from making that card aside from node stigma.

When it comes to semiconductor in-house development, so far the Chinese have proven to be great at making announcements and vaporware but little else.

I wish they were as prolific as in the electric auto industry. Maybe in a few more years hopefully?
 
Will be glad to see another TSMC plant come online OUTSIDE of Taiwan. You know good and well China at some point, will try to take over Taiwan, which will spell disaster to Taiwan AND China, not to mention the rest of the world.
 
While im thankful that TSMC had made this type of progress, im frustrated that it is ONLY TSMC. The monopoly they have let's them charge whatever they want to whoever they want. They could end a companies ability to be competitive just be refusing to do business with them.
Staying ahead is insanely expensive and by charging out of the wazoo they remain ahead. Self feeding loop.

And I know, Chinese companies are making great strides, but they're still basically still behind Intel at this point. Best thing they have going for them is they are cheap.
TSMC >>> Intel >> Samsung >>>> SMIC

imo Intel and Samsung should cross-patent their stuff for a limited time and share knowledge.
Neither of them is going to surpass TSMC on their own but if they join forces they might be able to compete or at least find some kind of niche. Perhaps start up a council of some sort to do shared research and involve IBM.

As long as we don't get a counterweight to TSMC then TSMC is free to "make line go up" and charge through the roof. With TSMC getting extremely fat margins and NVIDIA getting even fatter margins the market is pretty messed up for end consumers.

With how relatively close Intel still is to TSMC (closer than anybody else) their stock value is extremely undervalued imo. With a breakthrough or two they'd quickly rise to be one of the most valuable companies in the world.

 
Samsung and Intel just have to succeed with their foundries, otherwise TSMC can just keep increasing prices with no one able to call their bluff, not even Apple.

I've heard Samsung 2nm is doing pretty well and we'll soon know if Intel 18A is up to the hype.
 
It's all very good talking about costs per wafer but how many chips can an average wafer produce?
Depends on the size of the chip and the size of the wafer. Chip (die) sizes are usually easy to find in the spec sheets for the given chip and in reviews here. It doesn't look this article specified a wafer size but Google suggests it is 12 inches (300mm). Divide the wafer surface area by the die size and you'll have rough start but you'll need to subtract some for the space between, the edges of the wafer, and defects, which are common.

As one example on a current node size Google suggests the 5090 is a 750mm2 die, that about 55-60 could theoretically fit on one wafer, and that you might get ~47 working ones. (Even the working ones might have defects, but within the allowable product specs.)

This is not my field, others here might be able to explain better.
 
Will be glad to see another TSMC plant come online OUTSIDE of Taiwan. You know good and well China at some point, will try to take over Taiwan, which will spell disaster to Taiwan AND China, not to mention the rest of the world.
The only nations that have a history of taking other's nations are western imperialists and that poxy leach in the Middle East that terrorises its neighbours and commits heinous crimes.
 
The only nations that have a history of taking other's nations are western imperialists and that poxy leach in the Middle East that terrorises its neighbours and commits heinous crimes.
Russia, China, Japan, South Korea,, the list goes on. Many many countries have preyed on their neighbours throughout history, to claim only a few have... Ostrich, meet sand.
 
While im thankful that TSMC had made this type of progress, im frustrated that it is ONLY TSMC. The monopoly they have let's them charge whatever they want to whoever they want. They could end a companies ability to be competitive just be refusing to do business with them.


And I know, Chinese companies are making great strides, but they're still basically still behind Intel at this point. Best thing they have going for them is they are cheap.

Im sure plenty of people would be perfectly happy dealing with a 600watt card that gives 4090 level of performance if it actually did cost $500.

There isn't anything stopping anyone from making that card aside from node stigma.
Is nobody's fault that TSMC are doing real R&D and the others are slacking behind.
 
This is nothing to do with rising RND costs and all about TSMC's complete monopoly. I've never quite understood why this is given that, as I understand it, the machines they use for their high-end stuff are bought from ASML. Isn't the machine responsible for most the complexity in this process and so can't anybody buy these same machines?
 
This is nothing to do with rising RND costs and all about TSMC's complete monopoly. I've never quite understood why this is given that, as I understand it, the machines they use for their high-end stuff are bought from ASML. Isn't the machine responsible for most the complexity in this process and so can't anybody buy these same machines?
Patents. They design and patent the machines they order.
 
Will be glad to see another TSMC plant come online OUTSIDE of Taiwan. You know good and well China at some point, will try to take over Taiwan, which will spell disaster to Taiwan AND China, not to mention the rest of the world.
That's the thing. They want to stay in Taiwan because the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (Or atleast its goverment) would not like seeing Taiwan be invaded.

However, TSMC has significant leverage because if Taiwan was to fall, China would gain a monopoly over world wide bleeding edge chip proudction or atleast destroy it. Thus, it would be in the best interest of the west to defend Taiwan. Building a significant TSMC presence in the US (Or elsewhere) would remove a large part of this leverage.
 
The only nations that have a history of taking other's nations are western imperialists and that poxy leach in the Middle East that terrorises its neighbours and commits heinous crimes.
I'll just presume that you are talking about Iran then.............
 
Back