US opens investigation into Ford's BlueCruise driver assist feature after two fatal accidents

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,452   +1,588
Staff member
What just happened? Exactly two weeks after getting the green light to allow drivers to use Ford's BlueCruise on some stretches of UK highways, the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has opened a safety investigation into the "Level 2" driver assistance system. The probe comes after two fatal accidents allegedly involving the feature.

The NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) recently received two incident reports involving Ford's Mustang Mach-E. Both accidents were fatal nighttime collisions with stationary vehicles. Each resulted in one death. Although the ODI did not mention if the fatalities were passengers or drivers, it did determine that both had BlueCruise engaged at the time of the accidents.

The ODI mentions that some Ford vehicles come equipped with Co-Pilot360 Active 2.0, a suite of Level 1 driver assistance technologies. BlueCruise became part of this package in 2021 but is only operational on pre-mapped roads. Like many similar systems, BlueCruise monitors driver attentiveness and issues an alert when it falls below a threshold, like taking your eyes off the road for over a few seconds.

The NHTSA says that this is a preliminary investigation. It is unclear what actions it will take if the ODI finds the system faulty during night driving conditions. It is equally unknown if the investigation will affect the UK's recent decision to allow BlueCruise on Britain's highways.

This investigation will evaluate the system's performance of the dynamic driving task and driver monitoring. The SGO reports cited in the Opening Resume can be found in the investigation file at NHTSA.gov under the following titles:

  • SGO 2021-01 report ID: 502-7268
  • SGO 2021-01 report ID: 502-7426

It's important to understand BlueCruise is not autonomous driving (see Level explanations above). Like Tesla's poorly named Autopilot and GM's Super Cruise, BlueCruise is not much more than a glorified cruise control. At Level 2 automation, a driver must be in the driver's seat, alert, hands on the steering wheel, and ready to take control when necessary. Level 2 systems can perform simple automated driving functions, including acceleration, braking, keeping pace with traffic, and some steering.

Although BlueCruise is designated Level 2, it would be closer to something like Level 2.5 in that it has more automation but can only operate only on designated stretches of roadway. These sections are pre-mapped and approved by highway safety boards, so the autonomous system is already familiar with the road's features. Because of this, BlueCruise is considered "hands-off, eyes-on." Drivers may take their hands off the wheel, unlike Autopilot, but must still be ready to take over when necessary.

Permalink to story:

 
All of the sudden we find ourselves in a world where companies are risking people's safety, and lives as long as they get away with pushing forward their own version of Ai and self driving systems.

Whatever happen to oversight?
 
Problem is people, they watched too many syfy movies and think “the future is now”. People are simply not ready for these half baked solutions companies offer, they want the fantasy while in reality it is just a tiny step higher than cruise control. Companies should be held accountable for misleading practices in advertising their features to customers who fell for their bullsh*t. But who am I kidding, this will go on like it does in so many other places for years. Like selling 1GB ssd while in reality you get 950 after format since for some reason it is ok to say 1000MB=1GB and not 1024 or selling phones or tablets with 32GB only for Customers to find out 8GB is already reserved for operating system making the available space 24GB. And this goes on and on..
 
More importantly, why hasn't the Govt. banned all of these systems until and not before they are tested and determined to be 100% reliable and if they fail, the companies are held 100% liable and accountable. Maybe they need to put AI to work on it since it's supposed to be this centuries miracle ....
 
Yeah, I'll stick to my non automated motor carriages thanks.
All of the sudden we find ourselves in a world where companies are risking people's safety, and lives as long as they get away with pushing forward their own version of Ai and self driving systems.

Whatever happen to oversight?
More importantly, why hasn't the Govt. banned all of these systems until and not before they are tested and determined to be 100% reliable and if they fail, the companies are held 100% liable and accountable. Maybe they need to put AI to work on it since it's supposed to be this centuries miracle ....
How many decades of evidence will it take before you realize the Govt doesnt really care about your safety or life? You're a tax cow ot be milked, nothing more.
 
Yeah, I'll stick to my non automated motor carriages thanks.

How many decades of evidence will it take before you realize the Govt doesnt really care about your safety or life? You're a tax cow ot be milked, nothing more.
After taking a trip in my 24 Prius Prime and using the adaptive cruise control, I'm quite impressed. That said, its not full self driving, nor was there any implication during the buying process that it was, and I did pay attention to what the car was doing. I will use it again keeping well aware that I still need to pay attention to what the car is doing.

People need to realize that many manufacturers will BS anyone and everyone where there is a chance they will buy a car. IMO, Toyota is not such a manufacturer.
 
Yeah, I'll stick to my non automated motor carriages thanks.

How many decades of evidence will it take before you realize the Govt doesnt really care about your safety or life? You're a tax cow ot be milked, nothing more.
And those in government are accepting money from the manufacturers to turn a blind eye to the unproven new tech. Interested only in lining their own pockets instead of serving the public.
 
Back