"We loved VMware. Now we hate it": Customers react to Broadcom's changes

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 586   +13
Staff
In context: Broadcom's management of VMware since the acquisition has led to widespread dissatisfaction among customers, with many considering reducing or eliminating their ties with the company. The pressure is mounting for customers to either commit to a VMware subscription, forgo VMware support, or transition away from VMware technologies entirely.

In the wake of Broadcom's acquisition of VMware in late 2023, a growing number of customers have expressed discontent with the virtualization giant's new direction. The changes implemented by Broadcom have left many organizations at a crossroads, facing difficult decisions about their IT infrastructure.

Ars Technica spoke with an IT vendor manager from a global food manufacturing company with approximately 5,500 employees. The manager, who requested anonymity due to privacy concerns, has been using VMware's vSphere since the early 2000s. "We love it," the manager told Ars Technica. "It's hard for us to figure out how we can live without it, but we're going to."

The food manufacturer relies heavily on VMware, with about 300 virtual machines and every company application running on top of VMware. However, their five-year enterprise agreement expired in December, leaving them ineligible for VMware support unless they purchase a subscription. The IT manager revealed that costs associated with running vSphere are set to increase fourfold, largely due to Broadcom bundling unwanted VMware products together. "They wouldn't sell us what we need," the manager explained.

The issue of support and pricing is not unique to this company. Martin Biggs, VP and managing director of strategic initiatives and EMEA at Spinnaker, a company now offering software maintenance support for VMware, told Ars Technica that organizations are reporting price increases of three to six times on average. The largest price hike Spinnaker has encountered is a reported twentyfold increase.

While Broadcom has started offering some discounts – reducing price increases from seven- or eightfold to three- or fourfold in some cases – concerns persist. Michael Warrilow, a Gartner VP analyst, told The Register that Broadcom may raise VMware prices even further in the future. He also highlighted Broadcom's preference for two- or three-year subscriptions, which could leave customers facing even steeper costs sooner than anticipated.

Recent reports and discussions on Reddit suggest that customers are being pressured into three-year VMware subscriptions.

Support has become a critical issue for many customers. The food manufacturer's IT manager reported that after Broadcom's acquisition, they were no longer able to contact VMware directly for support. Instead, they were directed to IT distributor Ingram Micro, with response times stretching to a week or longer. This change came after Broadcom informed the company it wasn't large enough to receive direct support.

Migrating away from VMware is not the easy option as it has many challenges. A January Gartner research note estimated that large-scale migrations, involving 2,000 or more VMs, could take 18 to 48 months. Even for midsize enterprises, untangling dependencies on VMware's server virtualization platform could take at least two years.

For the food manufacturer, the biggest hurdle in moving away from VMware is internal rather than technical. "We just don't have enough internal resources and timing," the manager told Ars Technica. "That's what I'm worried about. This is going to take a lot of time internally to go through this whole process, and we're shorthanded as it is. It's such a big, heavy lift for us, and we're also very risk averse, so swapping out that piece of technology in our infrastructure is risky."

The executive added: "We loved VMware. And then when Broadcom bought 'em, we hated 'em."

In response to these complaints, Broadcom directed inquiries to a blog post by CEO Hock Tan outlining the company's VMware strategy. In the post, Tan claimed that Broadcom is "flexible and open" regarding subscriptions, stating, "Customers have choice when deciding the length of their subscriptions, whether they purchase directly from us at Broadcom or through channel partners. Either way, we will structure contract durations in alignment with our customers' journeys."

However, despite Broadcom's assurances, a VMware customer contacted by Ars Technica confirmed the claims made in recent Reddit posts about being pressured into three-year commitments.

Permalink to story:

 
Yeah, our company as well has been transitioning away from Broadcom products. I know my opinion will be in the minority, but we have been using Symantec ITMS (Altiris) for endpoint management (which I feel is a superior product), and the requirement to be locked into a three year contract has forced our management to switch us to Microsoft Config Manager. It has been hell using this new product, but the coin is king…
 
I see Veeam has added ProxMox support. Must have taken a good chunk of the smaller, lower end of the market away from VMware.

Medium to enterprise businesses, if anyone reads this comment, what are you moving to? Hyper-V I don’t see as quite good enough for such large deployments but maybe I’m wrong?
 
A 4 year migration? Jesus.

With all the automated migration solutions offered by EVERY cloud provider, I struggle with the 4 year claim unless you are needing to refactor some industry specific legacy stuff... like EPIC in healthcare or something... and even then that seems 2 years too long for a medium sized org.
 
A 4 year migration? Jesus.

With all the automated migration solutions offered by EVERY cloud provider, I struggle with the 4 year claim unless you are needing to refactor some industry specific legacy stuff... like EPIC in healthcare or something... and even then that seems 2 years too long for a medium sized org.

The larger part of big mjgrations like this that the business still has to keep developing new products and process. That means parallel dev and support.

But marketing/sales folks don't give a **** and keep putting together new initiatives and products that *don't* have to be IT approved. Enterprise leadership signs off and it's on IT to make it work by the sales deadline, regardless of infrastructure shifts or existing business warrantee.
 
I just did a 300 employee food company. They went proxmox and even moved backup products to proxmox. Obviously much smaller but it offers clustering and automatic fail over. It doesn't have vMotion but it keeps up well enough.

Only concern is support, since they are based in Austria and I don't trust their support vendors enough, just yet. We were going to become one but because it's basically a Linux environment, we didn't want to support people messing around with custom one off solutions. That's the biggest downside in my opinion. Example if some it dude reads for to add ocaml/Google drive via command line and it breaks a bunch of stuff, how does that work in traciing the issue back.
 
It doesn't have vMotion but it keeps up well enough.
I swear it does? It’s just called “live migration” in the control panel no?

Or do you mean vMotion of storage? I don’t think ProxMox has a live migration of storage like VMware has.
 
"However, despite Broadcom's assurances"

There was no "assurance", just a rambling nothingburger about contract lengths.

It's okay though, they'll earn their sales rep of the year award. Sales rep for Proxmox, that is.
 
Well, I've done several migrations in the hundreds-of-vm-scale. Dont see the point here - just do it. If you dont have the internal resources, hire an expert. Learning is always expensive. Dont do a vendor-lock-in.
 
I swear it does? It’s just called “live migration” in the control panel no?

Or do you mean vMotion of storage? I don’t think ProxMox has a live migration of storage like VMware has.

Yes I meant vMotion for storage which could essentially live load balance (shared storage). I believe PVE plans to add it, I just don't know to what extent. And live migrations aren't supported yet either, so the hosts have to be offline while you do the xfer. Better hope your client has 10Gb+ storage and networking backend, otherwise it's going to take a while as it's block level.
 
"However, despite Broadcom's assurances"

There was no "assurance", just a rambling nothingburger about contract lengths.

It's okay though, they'll earn their sales rep of the year award. Sales rep for Proxmox, that is.
Not a lot of money to be made in Proxmox. It's a $1000 a year for support. That's it.
 
Yes I meant vMotion for storage which could essentially live load balance (shared storage). I believe PVE plans to add it, I just don't know to what extent. And live migrations aren't supported yet either, so the hosts have to be offline while you do the xfer. Better hope your client has 10Gb+ storage and networking backend, otherwise it's going to take a while as it's block level.
Ah fair, I haven't played around with ProxMox enough to know it very well, I just remember having a couple of nodes and I could easily migrate VM's Between them without powering down.

To be fair, 10Gb isn't that expensive anymore, UniFi, Aruba InstantOn, Netgear, Even Cisco's lowest end Small Business Switches have 10Gb ports these days without breaking the bank.
 
VMware users are going through all five stages of grief at once—denial when Broadcom announced the changes, anger when the invoices arrived, bargaining with third-party support vendors, depression while calculating migration costs, and acceptance when they realize they’re stuck for another three years.
 
I imagine what would happen if MS bought Activision and tripled the price for base game.


Anybody buying something so expensive as VMware would be forced to look for new streams of income just because of the giant cost of this acquisition.
Don't they hire advisors before purchasing something as big as VMware?
It will be interesting to see how VMware does in the next 5 years or so.
 
My company also left VMware for that and other reasons, we went to AWS. Really easy build out there, but I did love VMWare back when it was great. Even if you have a purpetual license, they don't even let you redownload the software without a subscription plan...
 
VMware Workstation is in such an awful state that I've switched to VirtualBox in my home lab. The constant crashing is frustrating to deal with.
 
MBA thought process ... everyone loves us, lets extract more money ... less people love but many are happy enough, lets extract more money ... some still are happy, lets extract more money ... we've still got a few customers, surely they'll pay more ...
 
IT & Software Wall of Shame

Gold-Tier Offenders (The Worst of the Worst)

Cisco – Overpriced gear, restrictive licensing (Meraki bricking APs), killing the second-hand market.
Apple – Vendor lock-in king, forced obsolescence, and constant nagging about “security” to push upgrades.
LogMeIn – Went from great to an absolute scam with sky-high pricing and terrible support.
TeamViewer – Absurd pricing model, annoying "commercial use detected" bans, and greedy licensing.
Microsoft – Pushing subscriptions, killing local admin rights, Teams blocking IT elevation, and Windows 11 bloat.
Adobe – Killed perpetual licenses, moved everything to overpriced subscriptions, and doesn't even innovate.
Broadcom (VMware Acquisition) – Destroyed VMware’s pricing model and enraged longtime customers.

Silver-Tier Offenders (Bad, but not as awful as Gold-Tier)

Google – Killing off services at random (RIP G Suite free), tracking everything, and now AI search spam.
Splashtop – Used to be a budget-friendly alternative but now pushing business tiers and raising prices.
Dell – Locking down BIOS updates behind support contracts.
HP – Same as Dell, plus bricking printers for using third-party ink.
Lenovo – Preinstalled spyware (Superfish), excessive bloatware on ThinkPads.
Zoom – Initially lied about end-to-end encryption, now monetizing AI meeting analysis.
Oracle – Licensing hell, audits for sport, and buying companies just to squeeze them dry.

Bronze-Tier Offenders (Annoying & Greedy, but Less Hostile)

Slack – Used to be great, now just a bloated, slow, Microsoft Teams clone.
Norton / McAfee – Bloated, scammy "antivirus" that is basically malware.
IBM – Acquiring good companies (Red Hat) and slowly ruining them.
VMware (Pre-Broadcom) – Licensing got worse over time, but Broadcom accelerated the downfall.
Facebook / Meta – Endless tracking, ruining WhatsApp, and aggressive monetization.
Twitter / X – Turning into an ad-filled wasteland, with reduced usability and increasing paywalls.

Honorable Mention: "Fallen from Grace" Category

AnyDesk – Still decent, but rising costs and subscription push are worrisome.
RustDesk – Self-hosted alternative, but if they ever sell out, they'll land in Gold-Tier.
Canonical (Ubuntu) – Snaps are annoying, and enterprise moves are raising eyebrows.
 
Back