Wells Fargo fired a dozen employees for simulating "keyboard activity"

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,707   +500
Staff
Facepalm: Wells Fargo is one of the world's most significant financial institutions, part of the "Big Four" banks in the US alongside JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citigroup. Based in San Francisco, the company has garnered attention in recent years due to illegal financial practices. However, its employees appear to be held to much higher standards than (former) management figures.

Last month, more than a dozen Wells Fargo employees were fired for allegedly falsifying their work. According to a Bloomberg report based on a filing to the US Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (Finra), these individuals were part of the company's wealth and investment management unit.

They were terminated following an internal review that identified "simulation of keyboard activity" to create the appearance of active work.

Finra's disclosure lacks details about the specific circumstances under which these employees were simulating their work. However, Bloomberg noted that the finance industry was among the first and most stringent sectors in pushing for a return to office work after the pandemic.

Remote work allowed employees to reassess their career and lifestyle choices from a different perspective, but it also led to the rise in popularity of tools like "mouse movers" or "mouse jigglers," which simulate activity while employees engage in other tasks.

The term "simulation of keyboard activity," as reported by Bloomberg, could encompass such tools or other software-based solutions designed to mimic typing. In 2022, Wells Fargo implemented a new "hybrid flexible model" requiring most employees to be in the office at least three days per week. Managers are expected to be present four days a week, while branch workers and other staff members are required to be onsite five days a week.

According to a Wells Fargo spokesperson quoted by Bloomberg, the bank's employees are expected to adhere to the "highest standards" and avoid any unethical behavior. This is the same company that faced accusations of opening over 2 million fake accounts without customers' consent or knowledge to meet aggressive sales targets set by management.

Since 2016, Wells Fargo has paid billions to settle civil and criminal charges brought by affected customers. The former manager responsible for the bank's retail operations was sentenced to three years of probation. Additionally, Wells Fargo's former CEO has been permanently banned from the banking industry.

The ability of employees to effectively complete their tasks without being physically present at their desks has become a contentious issue, especially after much of the world spent significant time at home due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Banks, however, must maintain strict control over corporate devices to ensure compliance with regulations, making it easier to identify fraudulent activities or inadequate performance.

Permalink to story:

 
Wait, let's get this straight, Wells Fargo is calling other's unethical? Pot, meet kettle...
 
It's the right move. Holding people accountable is a step in the right direction. Next up shoplifters
Um, comparing employees trying to keep their jobs by looking busy against shoplifters is beyond the breach of civil discourse. Such a notion is so lacking in good judgment and sound reasoning as to seem like a complete and utter travesty of a joke.

Please tell us all you're joking with that crazy comment..
 
I'm giving this kind of speech to my son at school. as an overall META

Give the teachers what they want to see.
Not what you think the best answer is.

Many teachers are great and exceptions to this
Remember some short term job in London ( could work 7 days a week ) - transferring all there currency trading to another software program for a large bank. They had some from the personnel department in charge of this important project!! they were the silliest person ever
My group got put in charge of 2 of the biggest currencies (USD and one other ) . The race was to get all the months transaction transferred. I realise early on that our starting position was unverified . So wrote an excel macro to confirm our starting point . Got told off big time, as not my job ( ha wasn't anybodies job)
My group finished our 2 big currencies, so this Silly boss, oh we don't need yous don't come into tomorrow. Was hilarious her favorite groups were useless but very Cute ( her words ) and way behind . I knew they wouldn't complete the month on time and would have to start over to redo all the next month as well,
Learn my lesson, just give then what they want, doesn't matter a silly boss will cost the company another 20 Million pounds . more money saved to travel

Didn't care anyway hourly wage was not great , though huge OT and double pay Sunday and Saturday afternoon and free meal . She got angry if we talked, like it was going to affect our output ,

With Corps, just give them what they want and collect your paycheck

“There’s a right way, a wrong way and the army way.”

Remember reading Catch 22 as a young teen - was a good lesson to learn

Though in real life , get annoyed when some hired for the day as security at an event- is trying to enforce some stupid, no longer fit for purpose rule, that dramatically increases the danger eg moving large amounts of people safely in a risky environment ( eg low side barriers to large falls) , you better have good reason to back people up , or have them turn around . There is a complete science to crowd control at demonstrations, walking protests
 
Do you really think that having those employees in office would change anything?

The answer is no... they would probably be around doing other stuff that corporate tolerate on premise.
 
It's the right move. Holding people accountable is a step in the right direction. Next up shoplifters
Comparing criminals with people that are POORLY managed by a company are not the same thing.

All this is the fault of management being unable to manage their employees... it is not the employees fault's if their section heads are incompetent.
 
Comparing criminals with people that are POORLY managed by a company are not the same thing.

All this is the fault of management being unable to manage their employees... it is not the employees fault's if their section heads are incompetent.
I agree that management is difficult but your post makes me wonder why you don't place the blame with the people that actually cheated? Your line of logic is bad
 
Um, comparing employees trying to keep their jobs by looking busy against shoplifters is beyond the breach of civil discourse. Such a notion is so lacking in good judgment and sound reasoning as to seem like a complete and utter travesty of a joke.

Please tell us all you're joking with that crazy comment..
No, No joking. Holding people accountable is of critical importance whenever they do something wrong. I have a cartoon I snipped years ago...Boss comes up to a guys desk and asks "Why aren't you working?" Guy says "I didn't see you coming"
 
I just sit in my chair and space out for a while....

Space out?

Yeah I stare at my screen, but it looks like I'm working. I'd say in a given day, I do about 15 minutes of real, actual work.....
 
Comparing criminals with people that are POORLY managed by a company are not the same thing.
It may surprise some that lazy people are almost always lazy long before they get hired. Being lazy is hardly the fault of their bosses. Especially when the rest of the business is filled with productive people.
 
On the one hand, employees simulating keyboard strokes shouldn't be trusted. Indeed, they should be fired for this, it is dishonest.

On the other, a company measuring every keystroke shouldn't be trusted, either. It's easy to say "don't work for those kinds of companies", but the job market is crap.

I'm not sure what the company hopes to gain by measuring keystrokes. An employee was away from their desk for an hour... so what? Did they get their job done? Did they engage collaboratively with their fellow coworkers? Are their goals and objectives tied to business goals and objectives? Do they have too many or too few? All of these things are up to management to get right, and measuring keyboards and mice isn't going to provide useful insights here.
 
Seriously, how lazy can you be? You already have so many benefits working from home, and you are still that lazy? For our work, they don't care you are away or at the computer. As long as you reply back within 5 mins, and finish your works.
 
Measuring keystrokes is a poor indicator of performance and bad measures lead to bad behaviours. Whilst I don't condone gaming the system it sounds like a pretty miserable place to work.
 
Considering they were a part of the Wealth and Investment Management Team which probably also handles affluent clients too, I would say is a pretty important department. Were the ones fired high, medium, low performers or mixed? If they were using managed PCs (which I would think so) then everything they did can be monitored and checked against. As long as they sign your pay, employees will always be scrutinized. Remote working for large institutions where you handle money especially in investments is a risky job position.




 
I would have thought an employee who wasn't working most of the day would get fired for not producing rather than their mouse movements. Seems to me they didn't have enough work, or the company didn't notice they weren't performing at all because the people in charge were too lazy to track work that needed to be done and who was assigned to do it.
 
No, No joking. Holding people accountable is of critical importance whenever they do something wrong. I have a cartoon I snipped years ago...Boss comes up to a guys desk and asks "Why aren't you working?" Guy says "I didn't see you coming"
Oh please. Your logic shows a complete disconnect from the real conditions of the average office workplace. There are times when workers have to wait for work to do. It happens, frequently. It's a part of the job for many. People should NEVER be fired for not wanting to be fired and pretending to be more busy than they really are at a given moment.
 
Um, comparing employees trying to keep their jobs by looking busy against shoplifters is beyond the breach of civil discourse
Intentionally using tools to fake your activity is no different than submitting fake expense accounts or work logs -- or shoplifting. Learn ethics.

There are times when workers have to wait for work to do. It happens.
No employer ever fires workers for "waiting for work that hasn't arrived yet". Where do you get these absurd justifications?
 
Oh please. Your logic shows a complete disconnect from the real conditions of the average office workplace. There are times when workers have to wait for work to do. It happens, frequently. It's a part of the job for many. People should NEVER be fired for not wanting to be fired and pretending to be more busy than they really are at a given moment.
What you write makes sense just not in response to my post
 
Back