Whistleblower tells Congress Facebook worked with China on censorship and data access

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 590   +13
Staff

Sarah Wynn-Williams, a former director at Meta, delivered a searing testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week, accusing the tech giant of compromising American values and national security to expand its business in China. She alleged that Meta – formerly Facebook – collaborated with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to develop censorship tools and facilitate access to user data, including information on Americans. Her remarks have reignited scrutiny of Meta's operations and its ties to authoritarian regimes.

Wynn-Williams, who served as Facebook's Director of Global Public Policy from 2011 to 2017, painted a damning picture of the company's push to enter the lucrative Chinese market. She claimed that Meta executives misled employees, shareholders, Congress, and the public about their activities in China.

Meta allegedly began offering products in China as early as 2014 and was briefing CCP officials on emerging technologies like artificial intelligence by 2015. Wynn-Williams linked those briefings to recent reports that institutions tied to the People's Liberation Army have used Meta's AI model, Llama, for military purposes.

The testimony also referenced internal documents in which Meta pitched its services to help China "increase global influence and promote the China Dream." Wynn-Williams accused the company of pursuing a "secret mission" to build an undersea cable between China and the US – a plan she said was only halted after congressional intervention.

Meta has denied the allegations, with spokesman Andy Stone calling her claims "divorced from reality." He acknowledged that the company explored entering the Chinese market more than a decade ago but emphasized that Meta does not operate services in China today. Stone also accused Wynn-Williams of reviving outdated and false accusations from her bestselling memoir, Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism. The book has become a flashpoint in this controversy, with Meta seeking to prevent her from promoting it due to a non-disparagement clause in her separation agreement.

Her testimony comes at considerable personal risk. Wynn-Williams defied an arbitrator's order prohibiting her from speaking publicly about Meta and claimed the company now wants $50,000 in damages for each time she mentions Facebook. Despite the legal threats, Careless People has climbed bestseller lists and earned praise for its unflinching critique of Meta's corporate culture.

The Washington Post notes that senators from both parties expressed alarm over her disclosures. Senator Josh Hawley questioned Zuckerberg's commitment to free speech in light of these revelations.

"I don't trust this latest reinvention at all," Hawley said, referring to Zuckerberg's recent rhetoric about defending free expression while allegedly silencing critics like Wynn-Williams.

Senator Chuck Grassley echoed these concerns, calling her allegations "very troubling" and accusing Meta of rolling out "the red carpet" for the CCP.

One particularly striking episode involved Meta allegedly restricting Guo Wengui's account in 2017 after pressure from Chinese regulators. Guo, a prominent critic of Beijing, was reportedly targeted as part of Meta's efforts to gain favor with Chinese authorities. Internal notes from that time acknowledged the pressure, stating that action was necessary "to get the party's cooperation." When asked about this during a previous Senate hearing, Meta's then-general counsel Colin Stretch stated that company policies led to the decision – a statement Wynn-Williams called a lie.

The whistleblower also testified that Zuckerberg was deeply involved in efforts to enter the Chinese market.

"This was a project unlike any other ... it was so centrally led by Mark Zuckerberg," she said.

Her complaint filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission detailed how Meta developed a censorship system for China codenamed "Project Aldrin." The plan involved appointing a "chief editor" to shut down content during social unrest and giving CCP officials access to user data.

Although Meta officially abandoned its China ambitions in 2019, Wynn-Williams argued that the country remains a significant revenue source for the company. She cited SEC filings showing that revenue from Chinese advertisers totaled $18.35 billion in 2024 – more than doubling from 2022 financials.

In closing her testimony, Wynn-Williams urged Congress to hold Meta accountable for what she described as years of deception and complicity with authoritarian regimes.

"Meta has been willing to compromise its values, sacrifice the security of its users, and undermine American interests to build its China business," she declared. "It's been happening for years, covered up by lies, and continues to this day."

Permalink to story:

 
I guess I have to get in and post a comment before the thread gets comments shut down?

Censorship on the internet is absolutely a threat to my American 1st Amendment right to free speech and I'm not tolerating it. I refuse to do business with anyone who doesn't respect my rights - especially if they're a foreign entity.
 
Mark is obsessed with the Chinese.
The receipts are widely available.


Bruce Lee called it "The Art of Fighting - Without Fighting"

America has basically become an insurance company with a military.

China is winning friends economically and making their way into every other country. They'll use EV cars to get into developing nations and build their infrastructure. China, ironically, is doing a better job at capitalism than America is. China can win without firing a single bullet.

America, meanwhile, is turning friends into enemies and turning enemies into aggressors.

Big tariffs on Canada - population: 40,000,000 (about the same as California (which is shrinking by the way).

Tariffs on islands with penguins and no trade?

I foresee that we'll try to shift our production to India.

America survives off of slave labor.
 
I mean...duh? Like yeah, he did work with the Chinese, that's the only way you can legally sell your wares there.

And it's a well known fact that verboten posts were censored on his platform for years. That's why so many were leaving for greener pastures.
 
Mark is obsessed with the Chinese.
The receipts are widely available.

That’s why he married one, or was arranged into one. Surprised Bezos’s chick isn’t one either given that Amazon is practically a retail outlet for cheap Chinese garbage and knockoffs.
 
Until recently, Facebook worked with the US government on censorship, data access and gaslighting the population.

No need of whistleblowers, everyone knows they're doing that.
Now Meta seems to be moving towards normalization, but I have no idea how sincere is that.
 
I guess I have to get in and post a comment before the thread gets comments shut down?

Censorship on the internet is absolutely a threat to my American 1st Amendment right to free speech and I'm not tolerating it. I refuse to do business with anyone who doesn't respect my rights - especially if they're a foreign entity.

your 1st Amendment only "works" for you in your country, does not apply to any one else in the world. everyone else have their own laws and regulations. If you want to go there, you have to comply with them there. Deal with that when Meta violates your laws in your country.
and whatever meta do there in china, as long as no Chinese law in China or American law in the United States is violated, it's none business for anyone else's except those involved.
The only thing in whatever she said concerning you is the "including information on Americans".
"undermine American interests".. she said.. What? Interfering in other countries' affairs that don't concern them?
 
Last edited:
I guess I have to get in and post a comment before the thread gets comments shut down?

Censorship on the internet is absolutely a threat to my American 1st Amendment right to free speech and I'm not tolerating it. I refuse to do business with anyone who doesn't respect my rights - especially if they're a foreign entity.
The 1st Amendment doesn't apply in this case. Facebook is not the government. They can censor anything they want. You can choose not to use their platform, but it has nothing to do with the 1st Amendment.
 
your 1st Amendment only "works" for you in your country, does not apply to any one else in the world. everyone else have their own laws and regulations. If you want to go there, you have to comply with them there. Deal with that when Meta violates your laws in your country.
and whatever meta do there in china, as long as no Chinese law in China or American law in the United States is violated, it's none business for anyone else's except those involved.
The only thing in whatever she said concerning you is the "including information on Americans".
"undermine American interests".. she said.. What? Interfering in other countries' affairs that don't concern them?


And this is why we have WAR.
 
The 1st Amendment doesn't apply in this case. Facebook is not the government. They can censor anything they want. You can choose not to use their platform, but it has nothing to do with the 1st Amendment.

I can not only choose not to use their platform...

...but I can make war on them.
 
If true, this should be treated as treason and any executives who approved it should be tried as such.
 
How convenient, right in time for tariffs.

Spybook is blocked in China and has been caught colluding with the CIA in psyops. Considering how obsessed he is with identity and gender ideology it's obvious that this is a lie, as this insanity is banned in China.
 
I guess I have to get in and post a comment before the thread gets comments shut down?

Censorship on the internet is absolutely a threat to my American 1st Amendment right to free speech and I'm not tolerating it. I refuse to do business with anyone who doesn't respect my rights - especially if they're a foreign entity.
Why is it every first amendment advocate has no idea what the first amendment means?

You just proved you dont even know what the first amendment is and you here touting off about it.

Man we are cooked as a country.
 
Why is it every first amendment advocate has no idea what the first amendment means?

You just proved you dont even know what the first amendment is and you here touting off about it.

Man we are cooked as a country.

I know exactly what the first amendment means.

You are cooked as a country, I totally agree with that.
 
I know exactly what the first amendment means.

You are cooked as a country, I totally agree with that.
Respectfully, perhaps you can clarify your comment then if you truly do.


I guess I have to get in and post a comment before the thread gets comments shut down?

Censorship on the internet is absolutely a threat to my American 1st Amendment right to free speech and I'm not tolerating it. I refuse to do business with anyone who doesn't respect my rights - especially if they're a foreign entity.

Please explain how the 1st amendment protects free speech on private message boards on the internet.

Please demonstrate you know what the 1st amendment protects because based on your comment, you dont know what the 1st amendment protects.
 
Back