World's largest telescopes threatened by light pollution

zohaibahd

Posts: 935   +19
Staff
In brief: The pristine night skies above one of Earth's premier astronomical observatories are in jeopardy, and astronomers are sounding the alarm. A massive $10 billion renewable energy complex proposed just a few miles from the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in Chile could severely disrupt observations with increased light pollution.

European Southern Observatory Director General Xavier Barcons told Space.com that astronomers expect the project to brighten the sky by up to 10 percent around the observatory. Such an increase would be enough to diminish the Very Large Telescope's status as the world's premier observatory, reducing it to merely an "average" facility.

That modest 10-percent spike packs a bigger punch than it seems. Barcons warned that increased light could prevent observation of up to 30 percent of the faintest galaxies currently visible.

The VLT's incredible sensitivity has allowed groundbreaking discoveries like the first direct image of an exoplanet and the unveiling of the cosmic web structure. However, it would lose this capability were the skies to become brighter.

The energy complex in question is the INNA Renewables Park, planned by US energy giant AES. It would span over 7,400 acres in Chile's Atacama Desert and feature solar farms, wind farms, and hydrogen production facilities. Sadly, the project could also leak as much light into the night sky as a city of 20,000 people, based on ESO estimates.

The park spells potential trouble for the ESO's $840 million telescope. It will also affect its upcoming $1.5 billion Extremely Large Telescope on Mount Armazones. Both were carefully situated in the Atacama's remote regions to take advantage of some of the darkest night skies on the planet. The ESO and 16 member nations chose this site after an extensive global search for ideal observation conditions.

Barcons clarified that the ESO is not opposed to the facility; it is just its proximity. He argues that AES should build the energy complex further away from the observatory. Mocing it 50km (31 miles) further away would resolve the problem. The ESO is also calling for stricter legal protections of the Chilean night sky, especially around the observatories in the Atacama Desert.

According to AES Chile, the project is still in its early stages and pending final approval. In December, it submitted an environmental study stating that "community engagement is a top priority."

Image credit: ESO

Permalink to story:

 
There are relatively few true dark skies left on the planet we should protect them. Not building huge facilities that produce light pollution near something in the remote mountains isn't that big of an ask.
Well, a problem not mentioned in this article is the altitude at which these are placed. This is the highest dark sky site in the world and that's important because less atmosphere=less distortion in the images. There is no other site like this in the world.
 
The real question is why is a renewable energy site leaking so much light pollution in the first place? Surely that's a lot of wasted power?
 
Well, a problem not mentioned in this article is the altitude at which these are placed. This is the highest dark sky site in the world and that's important because less atmosphere=less distortion in the images. There is no other site like this in the world.

The VLT is at 8,640 ft above sea level. The Mauna Kea observatory in Hawaii is at 13,796 ft above sea level, and the University of Tokyo Atacama Observatory - also in the Atacama desert - is at 18,500 ft.

Sounds like the VLT is not the highest dark sky site in the world.
 
The VLT is at 8,640 ft above sea level. The Mauna Kea observatory in Hawaii is at 13,796 ft above sea level, and the University of Tokyo Atacama Observatory - also in the Atacama desert - is at 18,500 ft.

Sounds like the VLT is not the highest dark sky site in the world.
I got those 2 mixed up. However, if it is lower then that means that the impact from light pollution will be even greater.
 
There is more atmosphere for the light to reflect off of. You don't get light pollution in space

Sure. But it's all relative to the actual ambient light pollution in the area. Atmospheric distortion affects resolution and clarity regardless of any ambient light pollution.

In terms of this article and this observatory, it's all speculative, and remains to be seen what if any effect the actual installation will have.
 
The real question is why is a renewable energy site leaking so much light pollution in the first place? Surely that's a lot of wasted power?

The installation doesn't even exist yet. It's all speculation, no facts at all, they're just guessing, and basing it on the worst case scenario they can imagine. There's many ways to mitigate light spill. And the amount of power used for lighting a facility is probably the smallest power usage on premises.
 
Few miles away??? if this is not a sabotage by aliens among us who want to prevent us from studying stars, I dont know what it is.
Of all the places they could put that thing by, they picked a spot near one of a kind telescope...
 
The real question is why is a renewable energy site leaking so much light pollution in the first place? Surely that's a lot of wasted power?
Solar panels do not absorb 100% of light so some is reflected, the reflected light would brighten the area even at night.
 
The real question is why is a renewable energy site leaking so much light pollution in the first place? Surely that's a lot of wasted power?
It mentioned windmills, and in most places those are required to have lights on top so aircraft do not run into them at night; not sure on what Chile's laws are on that, mind you. And any hydrogen production facility would inevitably need maintenance done during the night & the workers kind of like being able to see what they are doing.

That said, some massive renewable to hydrogen production facility being build in a remote location seems like a massive boondoggle to me with extremely questionable economics, so I have considerable doubts that it will ever get past the planning & sucking up some government grants phase.
 
Back