YouTube hosts thousands of pirated films and TV shows at any given moment

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,847   +557
Staff
The big picture: In the early days of the modern Internet, Viacom attempted to silence YouTube over its "brazen" infringement of Hollywood copyrights. Today, however, YouTube has become one of Hollywood's most reliable partners in legal streaming, even though copyright violations continue to occur on the platform.

According to new research by Adalytics, YouTube continues to host a significant amount of "premium" content despite its ongoing efforts to curb copyright infringement. In a study focused on evaluating the effectiveness of clients' advertising campaigns, Adalytics uncovered thousands of unlawful clips and shared a portion of these findings with The New York Times.

Adalytics founder Krzysztof Franaszek said the study identified more than 9,000 alleged copyright violations on YouTube. The infringing content included full-length Hollywood films still playing in theaters, Netflix exclusives, popular television shows such as Family Guy, and live broadcasts of college football games.

Collectively, the unauthorized clips garnered over 250 million views. Many of the films, uploaded between July 2024 and May 2025, were produced by major studios. Among them was Lilo & Stitch, the live-action remake of Disney's animated classic, which was officially released on May 23, 2025. Over 200,000 people had already watched the film on YouTube, potentially costing Disney millions of dollars in lost revenue.

YouTube currently combats copyright infringement through Content ID, Google's proprietary digital fingerprinting system designed to detect and flag unauthorized video streams. However, Franaszek suggests that the system may not be functioning as intended.

YouTube spokesperson Jack Malon countered this claim, stating that Content ID flagged 2.2 billion potentially infringing videos in the past year alone.

When YouTube detects an unauthorized upload, rights holders are given the choice to either remove the video or monetize it by collecting advertising revenue. According to Malon, approximately 90 percent of flagged videos are allowed to remain online, while the remaining 10 percent are removed. YouTube does not analyze the content of the videos that are taken down at the request of studios.

Malon also dismissed the Adalytics study, calling it a blatant marketing effort aimed at attracting new clients with eye-catching and misleading data. He argued that labeling the flagged videos as "illicit" without considering the rights holders' decisions reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how YouTube's system operates today.

Franaszek said he launched the study after several Adalytics clients discovered that 60 percent of their ad spending was going to YouTube videos that were no longer available.

When a video is removed, YouTube also deletes any associated advertising records. Franaszek emphasized that his clients are seeking greater transparency into how their advertising budgets are being spent, and what types of content they're ultimately supporting.

Permalink to story:

 
It’s incredibly easy to bypass YT’s automated copyright detectors. The newest trick I’ve seen is when the content has a single row of pixels flipped.
 
No studio has lost any money. People that are going to pirate or find workarounds to use things without paying were never going to pay, therefore it isn't a lost sale.
 
No studio has lost any money. People that are going to pirate or find workarounds to use things without paying were never going to pay, therefore it isn't a lost sale.
I think in some cases piracy helps sales actually. I went to the cinema AFTER I pirated a movie to enjoy it on a big screen, but I wouldnt go if it wasnt available 4free. Same with the games, especially now when the demos arent being made anymore.
 
Google pretend to care but put as little effort and money into this as they think they can get away with.
 
I prefer to think of it as a form of free advertisement. There are plenty of movies I’ve bought the DVD after watching a YouTube snippet or even parts of the whole movie.
 
"potentially costing Disney millions in revenue", I doubt statements like that. I would never pay to watch Lilo and Stitch. But, if I saw it could be streamed for free, I might watch it.

That's why copyright and crushing torrent sites for millions in lost revenue is lies.
People would rather pay for Netflix if they weren't having to pay stupid increases, especially like Amazon and it's insane channel splitting.




 
Back