Enemy Territory : Quake Wars performance in-depth

Welcome to TechSpot
Join now | Login | About

TechSpot Pricewatch TechSpot Hot Deals

Windows Startup Radar Tips & Tricks (blog) Guides & Tweaks Windows updates

News Archive TechSpot Blog TechSpot RSS Feeds User Picture Gallery Techspot's IRC# (Chat) TechSpot in Spanish

Mozilla and Opera issue security updates

McAfee conducts spam experiment, nothing really discovered

Microsoft readies four security bulletins for Patch Tuesday

Toshiba to add Internet connectivity to DVD players?

New Halo 3 map coming next week for free

Apple slashes price of SSD-equipped MacBook Air

View last 50 headlines
View last commented

TechSpot PC Buying Guide - June 2008

Asus Extreme Radeon HD 4850 review

Asus Crosshair II Formula motherboard review

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200: The new budget king

Inno3D iChiLL 9800 GTX Accelero Xtreme review

Diamond Viper Radeon HD 3650 1GB review

More Reviews | Guides

Realtek Media Player (RtlRack) v 4.04

32bit Web Browser 08.07.01

Undelete Plus 2.95

NextSensor 2.7.5.1 Build 0703 Final

Kaspersky Anti-Virus Update July 4, 2008

Oront Burning Kit 2 Basic 2.5.6

Oront Burning Kit 2 Premium 2.5.6

More Downloads

Samsung SH-S223Q (TruDirect support) Firmware v ST00

Matsushita LF-P968C Firmware v 1.03

Realtek HD ALC 880 Audio CODECs v 1.97 for Windows Vista

Realtek HD ALC 880 Audio CODECs v R1.97 for Win XP/2000/2003 (32/64 bits)

ASRock X48TurboTwins-WiFi Bios v 1.20

Latest 50 drivers

Enemy Territory : Quake Wars performance in-depth

By Steven Walton on September 19, 2007
Editor: Julio Franco

Manufacturer: Various

Post/read user's feedback

Email this to a friend

Find videocard prices

CPU Scaling Performance

While we have found that recently released games such as Bioshock and Medal of Honor: Airborne play just as well on current lower-end processors, this is not the case with Enemy Territory : Quake Wars.

We found that when going from 2.66GHz to 2.33GHz the system would suffer a 12% performance loss. However, frequencies above 2.66GHz did not increase performance. Going from the E6750 to the E6320 saw a massive 29% performance loss while the E4300 was 38% slower.

Go to next page


	Introduction High Quality Performance Anti-Aliasing 2x Anti-Aliasing 4x CPU Scaling Performance Windows XP vs. Vista Performance Final Thoughts

TechSpot Pricewatch - Computer & Electronics Prices updated everyday

You can also browse through categories in our online price guide, among the available categories: Retail & OEM Processors - Video Cards - Motherboards - Memory - Soundcards - Hard Drives - Monitors - Printers - DVDs - CD-RWs - PDAs and more !

Get weekly updates on new
articles, news and contests
in your mail!

» Free Search Engine Optimization white papers

» Two great time-saving tips for Firefox 3

» BMW Builds a Shape-Shifting Car Out of Cloth

» Why every guy should buy their girlfriend Wii Fit

» Software for
creating
Invitations,
Business Cards etc?

» Ok, new problem

» Password

» How many fps should
I be getting in CS:S

» How to install
ubuntu when my
laptop does not have
a cd...