Relic
Posts: 1,372 +17
kimsland said:
I'm inclined to believe you. However, , I think reality disagrees with you at least a *little*.
That's because Aussies are so layed back, they say they are "Christian" when asked (and I note that your survey results were from 2006/2007, even if they are the latest or not)
But in reality They are not church going "religious" practicing people
I can honestly tell you that 99% of all people here don't go to church on Sundays.
So to say that you follow one religion or another, does not mean you actually practice that religion (so it would seem)
So those results show nothing. And can I just throw in another point here, do your best to get rid of "in god we trust" from your coins, it really is pathetic. We have moved on from the 16th century
So because that’s true in Australia, it cannot be true here in the US? It’s the same way (less so in the southeast). From personal experiences everyone makes themselves sound better (who wouldn’t?) but in reality it’s the major holidays when everyone really shows up. Just shows everyone everywhere is usually a hypocrite.
I like our "In God we Trust". Rather have that then Queen Elizabeth II on our coins personally . Putting monarchs on coins is soooo B.C. .
kimsland said:
Back to topic I'm all for the specific sites censorship, as I have kids (I note that most of you probably are kids and have a different view on this)
Yes supervise your young kids, but hello.. just a simple google should not show this rubbish (even on "moderate" settings)
They come home with an assignment to do (on lets say, animals) do a search and get god knows what (I note that the 8th pic out of 150,000,000 with Moderate search on, yielded a naked woman ??? WTH ?) I do note that this is mild.
Sure that's not one of the "sites" that's censored, but what's it doing there anyway? God forbid they search child modeling! Us parents have to constantly not make reference to such words.
So you kids might not see the issue. But us parents are a little sick of the easy access to anything freely available. When I was young The best we could hope for was a "people magazine". The Internet needs governing and it needs censorship else the children will grow up thinking that this normal behavior of animals and people (being one of the censored areas) That's just sick, and meant as a sick joke, unless some of you are turned on by a horse :dead:
I don’t know the average age of the audience here but I’d guess midish twenties. You're right about Google though even on moderate it does have a tendency sometimes to show inappropriate material. But if you as an adult can’t handle that either moderate it with your child or stop using Google and go to a safer alternative. I'm sure you know of some, there are plenty here in the US that are content and censor controlled for children in school, I’m sure you could find something.
Blaming the technology and internet is a bit ridiculous, especially when there are alternatives before needing government intervention into everyone's lives. Giving up freedoms for temporary security for kids which is a nice smokescreen for ulterior motives is just to much for me imo .
But in the end it’s your country and if you like the censorship that's your choice. Sadly though the bigger picture is more important.