No. But virtually all of the newer ones do.So, am I to assume from this that all supercomputers use only Intel and NVIDIA chips?
How true! I remember reading in the Weekly World News that the not-so-secret cabal only publicise these supposed "supercomputers" to divert attention from their "supersize supercomputer" that is being secretly assembled for the once cryogenically frozen, but recently thawed HItler and his loyal henchman, Elvis Presley by "World Government" Illuminati descendants.And if you had the world's fastest supercomputer, would you REALLY let the rest of the world know?
For a modest outlay you too could join the club.And I LOL'd @ "Procter & Gamble even uses supercomputers to make sure that Pringles go into cans without breaking. ".
A petaflop? what is that a thousand terraflops or something?
The trouble with that idea is, we'd probably have to borrow the money off China to do it.Let start building another super fast computer and kick china a**. we need to reclaim that title. =)
Ouch, that hurts......America ASSEMBLED the previously first place supercomputer. China still built it.
Really, the article's title has a smidge of bias in it. It seems they "won" the title of, "Worlds Fastest Supercomputer". But since "the contest" was rather informal at best, it's really a bit difficult to say exactly what happened.I thought the title said that china stole a supercomputer from the US.
That said, I still think we should borrow the money from China, and build ourselves a supercomputer faster than theirs. Besides, think of the massive irony that would be.
If I did....or maybe...if I were part of it, what better camouflage than lampooning it?@dividebyzero, how cutthroatily-piratey of you.
Am I to assume that you don't subscribe to slightly-obfuscative almost-conspiracy theories?
So then, what you're trying to say is, the reason Hasselhoff was the first to be kicked off this season of "Dancing With the Stars", was the fact you, "can't teach an old Pontiac new dances"? Not even in reduced gravity...?If I did....or maybe...if I were part of it, what better camouflage than lampooning it?
But of course it's all clearly nonsense, since most people in the know are well aware that Hitler has set up home on the moon, and the real puppet-master has been, at least since 1981, the re-animated corpse of David Hasselhoff - after DARPA successfully managed to graft the enviromental control unit from a Toyota Camry into David's otherwise vacant skull ( Little known fact: Knight Rider is a thinly veiled documentary..The art of hiding something in plain view! Although due to quality control concerns, the World Government decided against using the Pontiac TransAm -or any GM product.)
Right, there's so much bloat in that program, it's a wonder that the aircraft ever get off the ground.Ironic in the fact that these are the only people now who can play Microsoft Flight Sim 10 on full graphics
Presumeably a direct quote from General Motors' press release kit entitled " A Positive Spin on Understeer"...you, "can't teach an old Pontiac new dances"? )
I doubt there is. I'd think that DWTS is probably a little frivolous for a 121 year-old Adolf Hitler- he'd probably order the annihilation of Pacific Island nation if he missed his daily Metameucil, imagine the fallout(!) if he had to share his secret lab/condo with Mike SorrentinoBTW, thanks for the heads up! I never knew that the DTWS sound stage was on the Moon
Ahem, Don't you mean a "negative spin on oversteer", and wasn't that "Consumer Reports? From the same wonderful people that flipped the Suzuki "Samurai".Presumeably a direct quote from General Motors' press release kit entitled " A Positive Spin on Understeer"