a few quotes from the article that you linked;
Those who want the very best in air cooling will not be completely satisfied with performance of the Cooler Master Hyper 212.
I agree.
Those who will never overclock but who want a cooler that can provide low processor temperatures for an extended CPU lifespan will be ecstatic with the Hyper 212.
There is the answer to low CPU temps
If you never plan to overclock there is no reason to spend more money.
Okay
Finally there is the overclocker. The Hyper 212 will not take you to the top of the overclocking charts for an air cooler, but it will get you near the top if you use two push-pull fans.
I assume this is one you wanted me to read. Remember they were OC'ing a 75w C2 that maybe hit 3.9-4.0 with the best coolers of the day. not a i72600k that runs up to 5.0Ghz
which is why i said
If you do not plan on heavy or moderate OC'ing the 212+ is a thrifty solution, but compared to the top air coolers these days, you're looking at 15c+ difference.
Given the caliber and type of components the op is putting together, The 212+ just doesnt fit the bill, but hey, I'm just giving information , not ramming it down his/her throat.
very true, and i preach that to customers. however ive still got athlon xp's running oc'd from day 1 that havent had any issues. i've oc'd the crap outta almost all my processors from the day i got them and have not lost a single one. reality is that someone buying a 2600k and sabertooth will replace it long before it dies due to being outdated.
I will make you a bet though, if he/she does OC the i72600k moderate to heavy, the machine will shut down with a 212+ sitting on top of it.
**** edit
btw it was idle and load on that page, scroll down. either way, wasnt meaning to be rude as much as just a smart ***, doesn't translate on internet you seem to be pretty knowledgeable so just understand this, information isn't fact. you mentioned it as fact because some site had it on a review. these are just samples. do research and you will know so many variables make it hard to put credit in those numbers. they say they accommodate for the room temperature and show delta, but there are so many people who have said why thats bad practice. if you dont have a controlled environment then the results are just for fun at best.
oh you mean the 5c thing? I didnt know you were referring to the Anand article. you have to realize however that that article was from 4 years ago, and the 212+ was being compared to HSF of that era. they have come a long way from the monsoon to the likes of the Archon, Sliver Arrow, Ultra extreme, DH-14 etc etc. The more modern reviews I linked have a 12-14c difference and none of those are even on the chart with it.
About reviews:
I have the luxury of being able to test/bench a lot of these components myself. I then compare what I see 'hands on' with the review sites and decide which ones I trust....mostly. anyway those are the ones I use for references for OP's. I realize that many are beholden to sponsors , and it shows. Most people don't get to see that first hand though unfortunately.
wasnt meaning to be rude as much as just a smart ***,
no problem, I see those on the trailer hitches of Chevys all the time