also @ TechSpot: Bill Gates is once again the richest person in the world

Titan supercomputer displaces IBM's Sequoia as world's fastest

Discussion in 'TechSpot News and Comments' started by Jos, Nov 12, 2012.

Post New Reply
  1. Jos TechSpot Staff Posts: 1,668   +21

    The U.S. Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is now home to the world's fastest supercomputer, according to the latest Top500 list. Aptly dubbed Titan, the Cray-built system knocked off IBM's Sequoia after only six months in the...

    Read more
  2. MilwaukeeMike TechSpot Booster Posts: 970   +188

    (in before 'yeah, but can it play Crysis?')

    The worlds fastest computer runs off AMD!? I'd have lost that bet.
  3. ikesmasher TechSpot Addict Posts: 1,116   +80

    The real question is not if it can play crysis, but:

    Can it blend?
  4. Yeah...but can it play Crysis?
  5. VitalyT TechSpot Addict Posts: 574   +115

    Titan - as in Titanic? Well good sail then!
  6. Perhaps intel should build a super computer running intel processor and built-in graphics and call it wintel super computer.

    and nvidia should build its own calling it NV (because envy is owned by hp)
     
  7. dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,085   +193

    Titan is the "old" Jaguar supercomputer updated with Nvidia Tesla K20X co-processors. As for why Opterons are still used as opposed to Intel Xeon, this may provide some insight:
    Did you think that up all by yourself ?
  8. captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 8,769   +273

    I thought the Chinese had the world's fastest supercomputer. Or is that just the one with the loudest mufflers?
  9. captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 8,769   +273

    If it's irony you want, then irony you'll get.. Did you know that "Megaupload's" seized files were hosted by "Carpathia's" servers?
    dividebyzero likes this.
  10. dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,085   +193

    The Chinese used to have the fastest, but Titan has the new paint job that puts the Chinese to shame. I hear that the Chinese are looking to source a tail spoiler, some chrome rims and a good subwoofer, which should entail that they regain top spot.
    Rescue followed by torpedo ?
    BlueDrake and captaincranky like this.
  11. captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 8,769   +273

    LMAO......That gets the first "like" of the new session.....
  12. dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,085   +193

    Thanks, though I fear we've fallen short of the high bar that VitalyT has set
  13. captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 8,769   +273

    I think it was Satchel Paige that said, "don't look back, there's always somebody gaining on you".
    I think it was Satchel Paige that said, "don't look back, there's always somebody gaining on you".

    It's such a rare and blissful thing when one reply works for two different quotes....

    But, speaking of "supercomputers", I bought a Core i3-3225 with a Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H (ATX) board for $215.00 US. The i3 has the 4000 series graphics. My question is, "will that graphic chip supply 1080p porn to my TV without complaint, or any appreciable stuttering? I hate it when an IGP locks up in mid-shag....
  14. VitalyT TechSpot Addict Posts: 574   +115

    What's low is the creators' imagination for the name. It's just as original as calling it "The Best Supercomputer". Google for Titan products, you'll find millions. Ironically, half of them did do the Titanic thing :)
  15. Zoltan Head TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 258   +27

    I quite fancy one - can someone recommend a case fan for it please?
  16. Wow, this is so totally cool. By the way, what's a "petaflop"?
  17. Pan Wah TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 130   +26

    It's what bunnies do in Mr. McGregor's garden.
  18. 9Nails TechSpot Paladin Posts: 623   +19

    My cell phone will do that in sleep mode!
  19. Kakkoii Newcomer, in training

    Hah, well, it's more like it runs off Nvidia. The AMD processors are just there for a few minor tasks that the GPU still can't quite deal with well, so they obviously went with the cheapest option for that, instead of the highest performing :p
  20. GeforcerFX TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 139   +11

    completely wrong actually, except for the cost saving, the main reason they went with AMD CPUS was because jaguar was AMD, and they were not going to need to switch out the boards. Anandtech had a very well done article about titan two weeks ago. The new CPUs have have 16 Cores per CPU(jaguar was 12, and the new ones are based off the new Bulldozer architecture), there are 4 cpus and 4 gpus per board. For most of what Titans doing at this time its still very CPU core reliant, but the GPUS will become more and more key as the researchers code it into there programing.