also @ TechSpot: Is Apple's USB wall adapter really worth $29?

"No more gaps" says Steve Ballmer

By

On July 28, 2006, 11:37 AM EST

In what increasingly hints at Microsoft moving to a subscription based distribution for all their software, MS CEO Steve Ballmer said that the 5-year gaps between each release of Windows is too long and won't happen again. While it's not always 5 years, it's still fairly long. This points towards subscriptions, because with major changes in Windows requiring upgrading comes the cost involved in doing such. You can much more easily convince a business to buy 150 licenses of “Windows 2010” if they get it for a subscription fee of some sort. This could mean that Vista's successor could come much sooner than Vista itself arrived:

Microsoft has not said when Vista's successor, code-named Vienna, might ship or what features it will contain. Despite the desire to make Windows releases more frequent, Ballmer said there will always be people trying to work on things that take years to make happen. "We just won't promise them to customers and hold up big releases," Ballmer said.

As an interesting tidbit, Ballmer said in the same speech that a miniature Sony, Yahoo and Google lived inside Microsoft, aspiring to come out. Sounds creepy.

No tags on this story

User Comments (7)

Post a comment
djleyo
on July 28, 2006
8:18 PM
ill believe until i see it

Reply

DragonMaster
on July 28, 2006
10:42 PM
If I see new Windows releases coming out as fast as Fedora Core (Every 6 months), I'll be impressed.

Reply

zephead
on July 29, 2006
12:17 AM
"requires the cost"? god forbid microsoft should make a slightly less outrageous profit...

Reply

nic
on July 29, 2006
5:06 AM
I don't want to see my OS obsolete too quickly, as this will mean extra expense for software/hardware upgrades. A 3 year cycle seems good to me, so long as service packs and security patches keep coming as and when required.

Reply

DragonMaster
on July 29, 2006
8:31 AM
They don't need to require twice as powerful hardware everytimes. New FC releases are just more efficiently coded and have a few more features, that's all!If MS could just start a new OS from zero without backwards compatibility (And the bugs they need to add for this), Windows would be so much faster! (They could add better backwards compatibility than before with a virtual machine and the real old OS files - that you could install as an option)

Reply

spike
on July 29, 2006
11:47 AM
Well, Any new OS would have to be backwards compatible with XP and probably 2000, but no more than that. I rather think that it's time to ditch the old and bring in the new - isn't that what Vista is all about though?

Reply

DragonMaster
on July 30, 2006
1:49 PM
They add features, and probably threw out some of the backwards compatibility. I don't know if it should natively be able to work with XP, unless XP-compatibility wouldn't require the addition of too much bugs -> Some apps need some older Windows bugs to work... -> Why Windows is so buggy. The switch to UNIX for MacOS requiered people to get new apps (Or use OS 9 in a virtual machine) and that's why it's more stable. (Well, actually, I already saw OS X crash, but anyways...)With Linux, people can correct all the problems that older applications have since they got the source to make them compatible with newer compilers, kernels and architectures. Commercial programs for Linux that don't have the source available are a bunch of trouble since the companies don't really support them -- or at least don't compile the 64-bit versions, which causes problems with Mozilla browsers. (Flash when it was Macromedia, Sun Java, Adobe Reader)

Reply

Browse more commented news

Post a new comment

Guest user

To post as an anonymous
user click here
.

Members

If you are a TechSpot member,
please login first.


By signing up you gain complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of computer and technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Post messages, get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.

Subscribe to TechSpot

Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.