Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
Tech Tip of the Week: Customize Your Windows 7 Start Menu Button featured
Free-to-play Need for Speed MMO hits open beta
Xbox 360 slim model in the works?
Acer TimelineX 1830T specs revealed, packs Core i5
Intel's Core i7-980X EE shows up in a slew of gaming rigs
EVGA Classified SR-2 fits twin six-core Xeon processors
TS Community
| User Gallery | Recent Discussion |
 My New Beast by 1bellb |  My First Attempt at Wire Management by Obi-Wan Jerkobi |
TechSpot RSS |
Industry News
Finland courts rule breaking CSS isn't a crime
What if defeating a copy-protection mechanism was allowed by law if the mechanism was “ineffective”? That's exactly is going on over in Finland, with Finnish courts ruling that two people charged with defeating CSS are not guilty of breaking a copyright law, due to the ease at which CSS is defeated worldwide. Due in part to testimony from expert witnesses, the court agreed that bypassing CSS wasn't anything particularly special:
"[S]ince a Norwegian hacker succeeded in circumventing CSS protection used in DVDs in 1999, end-users have been able to get with easy tens of similar circumventing software from the Internet even free of charge," wrote the court. "Some operating systems come with this kind of software pre-installed.... CSS protection can no longer be held 'effective' as defined in law."
That said, it can't be making the media companies happy. If any other countries follow suit, it could lead to a huge grey area as to what is violating a copyright and what is not when it comes to duplicating media.
One could also argue that if a DRM technique is defeated ever, and the method can be reproduced, that it is “ineffective”. This ruling could easily end up benefiting consumer rights. Then again, it may just end up with many more ridiculous lawsuits surrounding DRM.
"[S]ince a Norwegian hacker succeeded in circumventing CSS protection used in DVDs in 1999, end-users have been able to get with easy tens of similar circumventing software from the Internet even free of charge," wrote the court. "Some operating systems come with this kind of software pre-installed.... CSS protection can no longer be held 'effective' as defined in law."
That said, it can't be making the media companies happy. If any other countries follow suit, it could lead to a huge grey area as to what is violating a copyright and what is not when it comes to duplicating media.
One could also argue that if a DRM technique is defeated ever, and the method can be reproduced, that it is “ineffective”. This ruling could easily end up benefiting consumer rights. Then again, it may just end up with many more ridiculous lawsuits surrounding DRM.
