also @ TechSpot: LG Display announces 5.0-inch, 1080p AH-IPS display for smartphones

Facebook spammer ordered to pay $711 million

By

On October 30, 2009, 11:48 AM EST

Facebook has been awarded $711 million in damages against spammer Sanford Wallace for bombarding the social networking with phony wall posts and messages. The so-called “Spam King” was sued in February along with Adam Arzoomanian and Scott Shaw for allegedly obtaining login credentials for other users' accounts, and sending out links to phishing sites and other websites that paid spammers for referrals.

While Facebook isn't expecting to receive the full amount of the massive award, the company says they'll work hard to get everything they can and hope this will serve as a deterrent to all spammers. In addition to the damages, Judge Jeremy Fogel of U.S. District Court in Northern California's San Jose division referred Wallace for prosecution of criminal contempt of court, which means he could face jail time.

This isn't the first time Wallace has been targeted and fined. In May 2008, he was found guilty of violating the CAN-SPAM act and was ordered to pay $230 million for spamming and phishing on MySpace. Wallace was also hit with a nice $4 million fine from the FTC in 2006 and has faced numerous other suits in between.

Related Stories

No tags on this story

User Comments (54)

Post a comment
Guest
on November 29, 2009
7:35 PM

Wow that is a lot of money to pay back. That guy must make a lot of money. I had someone sign up on http://316ex.com a site that I am working on and spam every user.

Reply

AnonymousSurfer
on November 29, 2009
7:42 PM

Nobody likes spammers, but $711 million? That's a bit much if you ask me. Then again, depends on how many users they hacked when stealing logins and sending them to sites. I guess if I was Facebook, I'd enjoy getting money because spammers were spamming. Maybe this will teach other spammers out there not spam.

Reply

Guest
on December 2, 2009
2:57 PM

Yeah there definitely needs to be some harsher punishments for spammers.

Like others mentioned... seize all assets, just like what happens with drug dealers.

And at least a 5 year jail term, (Should get the chair though, lol!!) so that deters others.

Reply

Guest
on December 6, 2009
12:48 AM

it's not actual damages, it's a $10,000 fine per occurance. $711,000,000 most likely means that they proved he sent at least 71,100 pieces of spam.

Reply

Browse more commented news

Post a new comment

Guest user

To post as an anonymous
user click here
.

Members

If you are a TechSpot member,
please login first.


By signing up you gain complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of computer and technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Post messages, get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.

Subscribe to TechSpot

Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.