Verizon makes its case against the FCC's Net neutrality rules

By Lee Kaelin on July 4, 2012, 4:00 PM

Verizon made a clear stance against the Federal Communications Commission's new net neutrality rules, filing a legal brief with the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Washington claiming that the new rules exceed the regulator's authority and even went as far as to say they violated the constitutional rights of the networks owners.

In December 2010 the FCC adapted a set of net neutrality rules in an effort to protect broadband users from networks slowing down certain traffic or blocking certain content. In principle, it would also prevent companies from favoring their own traffic in a bid to make their own services faster than the competition. The rules were registered with the government in September last year.

The wireless provider firmly believes the FCC's net neutrality rules threaten its First Amendment rights to freedom of speech as well as property rights covered by the Fifth Amendment. Verizon also believes Congress has not given the FCC the power to enforce net neutrality regulations on the nation's ISPs.

"It violates the First Amendment by stripping them of control over the transmission of speech on their networks," Verizon said in a statement to Bloomberg. "And it takes network owners' property without compensation by mandating that they turn over those networks for the occupation and use of others at a regulated rate of zero, undermining owners' multibillion-dollar-backed expectations that they would be able to decide how best to employ their networks to serve consumers and deterring network investment."

Ultimately this could potentially result in one of two things happening. If the courts rule that the FCC has exceeded its authority, Congress could respond by changing the law to explicitly authorize network neutrality regulations. But if the courts accept Verizon's constitutional arguments, then imposing network neutrality rules on the nation's broadband carriers could require a constitutional amendment, which could be tough to pass.

"We look forward to defending our open Internet rules in court," FCC spokesperson Neil Grace said in an emailed statement to Bloomberg. "This strong and balanced framework is helping ensure that the Internet continues to thrive as an engine for innovation, investment, job creation, and free expression."

The case is Verizon v. Federal Communications Commission, 11.1355 with the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Washington.




User Comments: 9

Got something to say? Post a comment
aspleme said:

Freedom of speech is a right of individuals, not corporations.

Guest said:

Am I going crazy or is Verizon trying to use the First Amendment to enable the corporation to control communication... I thought that amendment pertained to the freedom of speech not the restriction of it.

They may have a case with regards to their infrastructure but bringing up the First Amendment looks like a red herring to me.

Mantrhax Mantrhax said:

Verizon defending their right to screw the consumers anytime anywhere. First Amendment ueahueh yeah sure.. let the company speak !

Guest said:

yes, but (quite unfortunately) corparations have many of the rights of individuals with almost none of the conscience of them. think of corporations as sociopaths.

Guest said:

Well, considering that in the Unsane States of America corporations are people, of course they can sue for alleged infringement of their first amendment rights. And being a corporation, the courts will naturally favor Verizon because they have lots of the only thing that was ever important, money.

h4expo said:

Freedom of speech is a right of individuals, not corporations.

...Word!

Though an unprincipled people could be perceived as being weak with no economical infrastructure. Hence corporations with god a complex. Thinking they are entitled to things they are not.

TJGeezer said:

Not according to the Republican-appointed majority on the U.S. Supreme Court. Meh.

TJGeezer said:

Dang - my quote of @Aspleme, saying freedom of speech was for individuals not corporations, didn't come through.

Unfortunately, the constitution says whatever the Corporate Supremes now running the highest bench say it does. No matter what the founders who wrote the Bill of Rights intended. Face it, you poor Americans, corporations now own your government openly.

"Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism as it is a merge of state and corporate power."

- Benito Mussolini, cribbing from Italian theorist Giovanni Gentile

Tygerstrike said:

In the big picture, Verizon will fail in the suit. They just are not big enough to threaten the US govt. They can TRY and claim a first amendment violation, but they have to PROVE there was the intent to violate. Not just thier skew or slant on it.

Load all comments...

Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.