Nvidia feels cloud gaming has a bright future despite rocky start

By on September 25, 2012, 7:30 AM

Cloud gaming took a major step back in most people’s eyes following OnLive’s recent mishaps but not everyone feels the platform is destined to fail. A recent interview with Nvidia’s Phil Eisler may help to instill some confidence in cloud gaming as he sees a bright future ahead.

Eisler is the general manager for Nvidia’s GeForce GRID Cloud Gaming division. He’s the first to admit that cloud gaming has some serious hurdles to clear but it’s not insurmountable. The GM points out that a speedy Internet connection is a key to the platform’s success. A 5Mbps connection should be able to sustain 30 frames per second at 720p resolutions but if you want to bump up to 60FPS and 1080p quality, a connection in the 15-20Mbps range will be necessary.

Latency is also another problem Eisler mentioned. First generation cloud gaming platforms were only able to get latency down to around 250 milliseconds – not exactly optimal for multiplayer gaming. Gaikai, powered by GRID servers, is reportedly able to get this figure down to around 160ms. Part of this reduction comes from Nvidia’s GPUs which is able to capture and encode quicker than competitors. They are also working on client optimizations which are expected to shave off another 20ms of latency.

Sony’s decision to buy Gaikai earlier this summer for $380 million tells Eisler the Japanese electronics giant sees a future in cloud gaming. It’ll be interesting to see what Sony ultimately decides to do with the acquisition and if cloud gaming can live up to the hype from Nvidia.

User Comments: 8

Got something to say? Post a comment
Arris Arris said:

"GeForce GRID Gloud Gaming division." Oopsy

TekGun TekGun said:

"Cloud gaming took a major step back in most people's eyes"

That should read "Cloud gaming is a major step back"

Just let it die already.

Alexmx said:


While living in a 3rd world country I can only wave at it as it passes by. Even 6mbps here are a premium

1 person liked this | Amigosdefox said:

160 ms is still too much for multiplayer in my opinion. In a fps the difference between making a kill or being shot.

Guest said:

Next year we can play Crysis 2 from cloud gaming..

Ranger12 Ranger12 said:

Cloud gaming sounds like the ultimate DRM. No thanks!

dennis777 dennis777 said:

So they have a giant xbox with super long video and controller cable...

imagine yourself playing onsite

cliffordcooley cliffordcooley, TechSpot Paladin, said:

If they fixed it where machines that don't need this extra graphical boost can process their own frame rates, I can go along with this idea. The only gamers that might benefit from this are the ones that have low-end systems. However looking at the possibilities that anyone willing to pay for high speed ISP services, will probably have high-end systems and will not need graphical processing from cloud gaming.

Load all comments...

Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.