Google rolls out paid subscription channels on YouTube (update)

By on May 9, 2013, 5:05 PM
google, youtube, channels, subscription, pay per view

Update: YouTube has officially launched a paid channel pilot program for a select number of content partners that includes the likes of Sesame Street and UFC. Subscription fees start at $0.99 per month, with the option of yearly discounts and a 14-day free trial. At launch we are able to find 53 paid channels, though YouTube is expecting to add many more in the coming weeks. Days before we hinted at the possibility of YouTube being able to compete with streaming providers Hulu and Netflix, and although they are clearly not there yet in terms of content, they appear to be carrying similar geographic restrictions. In other words, if you are outside the US it's quite likely most channels will be unavailable to you, even if you are willing to pay.

The original story is below:

Google is preparing to roll out a paid subscription service for some of the specialist video channels on YouTube. According to the Financial Times, people familiar with the plan have said that it will apply to as many as 50 existing channels, and subscriptions could cost as little as $1.99 for each channel.

The subscription service is expected to be rolled out soon, meaning it could be launched as early as this week. With this change YouTube intends to expand the kinds of content that channel operators are able to produce, including TV shows and films.

As professionally produced videos that were once only available on network television become more common on the Internet, YouTube is looking at ways to leverage the medium and expand their revenue stream using the subscription-based model. In the past 18 months, YouTube has reportedly spent more than $200 million on advances to dozens of start-up channels.

Google has responded to the Financial Times report, saying that they have nothing to announce yet but have been "looking into creating a subscription platform that could bring even more great content to YouTube for our users to enjoy and provide our creators with another vehicle to generate revenue from their content, beyond the rental and ad-supported models we offer."

Earlier this year it was also suggested that YouTube could be working on pay-per-view and à la carte options for video channels.

Whether this is an attempt by YouTube to compete with other streaming content providers like Hulu and Netflix remains to be seen, but broadening their content will certainly bolster their existing offering. YouTube’s audience broke the one billion user mark this year with the help of channels, and, personally, I can’t wait to see Grumpy Cat: The Movie.




User Comments: 8

Got something to say? Post a comment
1 person liked this | Littleczr Littleczr said:

That is lame, I can't think of any channels worth paying $1.99, however pay per view might be something I would like. Maybe movies at 1080p, I don't know.

1 person liked this | amstech amstech, TechSpot Enthusiast, said:

I think it's a great idea, pending the channels.

Guest said:

Do not understand how this will work

You will start to see people pirate Google videos :|

re uploading them on YouTube itself or other locations

and its a two edged sword the channel owners themselves who want as much people watching their content will lose people who wont pay and wont watch

danhodge danhodge said:

People are reading this totally wrong, even though this article is perfectly written to stop people from doing so.

They aren't making your run of the mill Youtubers subscription based. This wont affect PewdiePie, Yogscast, Machinima or the gamestation (for now, anyway), but instead will be for TV/films. Things which you previously couldn't access on Youtube, because it got removed for copyright.

So, to round up, the only subscription content will be new content. Noone loses out on anything, and if you are willing to spend the (lets face it, pretty small) fee each month, you have a Netflix-like service. Except most likely inferior to competitors...

Guest said:

So did Facebook years ago, and its still a free soul taker ;)

MilwaukeeMike said:

That is lame, I can't think of any channels worth paying $1.99, however pay per view might be something I would like. Maybe movies at 1080p, I don't know.

Maybe not now, but think what this could start.... the general public has been waiting for a la carte cable subscriptions for a long time. Right now it's just a couple channels, but if they work out maybe next we'll see some of the bigger cable channels on there, like Discovery, Nat Geo, TBS etc. ESPN would probably be last since they usually have huge contracts with Directv and the like. But maybe someday we could get all our TV like this.

cliffordcooley cliffordcooley, TechSpot Paladin, said:

So, to round up, the only subscription content will be new content. Noone loses out on anything, and if you are willing to spend the (lets face it, pretty small) fee each month, you have a Netflix-like service. Except most likely inferior to competitors...
Sounds nice, but if the subscription still throws advertisements in your face, I won't be interested. I'm not gonna pay to watch the damn things. I would however pay to get rid of them.

Guest said:

Screw youtube, you already have money up your A**, stop wasting time. You don't need this freakin tax, I do videos of MUGEN and I don't want to have to pay some shitty tax.

Load all comments...

Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.