Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
Weekend Open Forum: Have you upgraded to Windows 7 yet? What is there to like/not? featured
Tech Tip of The Week: Turn Off your Display Using a Windows Shortcut and More featured
Netflix PS3 streaming arrives tomorrow
Dell's ultra-thin Adamo XPS to ship soon for $1,799
Windows 7 crushed Vista in early launch sales
Nvidia Tegra 2 to double performance, arrive next year?
Legion Hardware Reviews
TS Community
| User Gallery | Recent Discussion |
donu_wins_the_Asus_E ee by donu | My Desktop Redux by Obi-Wan Jerkobi |
Vista BenchMark, I got a 3 on my laptop by CrossFire851 | My Bedroom by JimShady23 |
Reviews
ATI Radeon X1650 Pro vs. Nvidia GeForce 7600GS
![]() |
By Steven Walton on October 31, 2006
Manufacturer: Various
|




When it came time to overclock the Radeon X1650 Pro was just about all out of legs. Given ATI has almost pushed this core to its limits already, we never expected to get much more out of it and we never did. The core accepted another 40MHz while the memory took another 100MHz DDR. The 7600GS on the other hand took a core clock boost of 62MHz while the memory climbed another 144MHz DDR.
Although this meant that the GeForce 7600GS was still a long way behind the Radeon X1650 Pro in terms of core and memory frequencies, it was able to dominate the X1650 Pro in the benchmarks, particularly in Far Cry, UT2004 and Quake 4.
Article Index |
TechSpot RSS




