Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
TechSpot Blog: Disable Windows automatic check for solutions after a program crashes featured
Weekend Open Forum: Google Chrome OS and the future of cloud computing featured
Tech Tip of the Week: Unearth Region-Specific Windows 7 Themes featured
Sony: PlayStation 3 to be 3D-capable via firmware update
Weekend tech reading: How to run Chrome OS as a virtual machine
Facebook named third most popular video website behind YouTube and Hulu
Details of Intel's 32nm Atom emerge, on track for 2011
iSuppli: DDR3 to account for over half of DRAM shipments by Q2 2010
Legion Hardware Reviews
Reviews
ATI Radeon X1650 Pro vs. Nvidia GeForce 7600GS
![]() |
By Steven Walton on October 31, 2006
Manufacturer: Various
|




When it came time to overclock the Radeon X1650 Pro was just about all out of legs. Given ATI has almost pushed this core to its limits already, we never expected to get much more out of it and we never did. The core accepted another 40MHz while the memory took another 100MHz DDR. The 7600GS on the other hand took a core clock boost of 62MHz while the memory climbed another 144MHz DDR.
Although this meant that the GeForce 7600GS was still a long way behind the Radeon X1650 Pro in terms of core and memory frequencies, it was able to dominate the X1650 Pro in the benchmarks, particularly in Far Cry, UT2004 and Quake 4.
Article Index |
TechSpot RSS




