The new QX9650 provided a reasonably impressive performance gain over the QX6850 in Adobe Photoshop as it was 13% faster. It is worth mentioning that the QX6850 holds a similar performance lead over the Q6600, but there is a 600MHz discrepancy between those two.
The QX9650 provided a marginal 3% gain in Pinnacle Studio, though this is still a positive result.
The QX9650 was back in winning form defeating the QX6850 by a 13% margin in QuickTime Pro as it completed the test 44 seconds faster than the QX6850.
3D Studio Max allowed the QX9650 to provide an 8% performance gain when compared to the QX6850 (3 second saving).
The above results are measured in KB/s and as you can see the QX9650 was impressive as it sustained a throughput speed of 2162KB/s, making it 16% faster than the QX6850. Those that often work with large compressed files will no doubt find a 16% performance gain very worthwhile.
The Cinebench test was the only one included here that didn't award the QX9650 with a clear performance advantage over the QX6850. While the QX9650 was faster, the margin was insignificant.
Featured on Processors
Legion Hardware Reviews
From the Forums
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.