Activision CEO Bobby Kotick allegedly failed to inform the company board about rape allegations

[Squid Surprise]

There is a very large amount of data. There are statistical error margins around it. The police determination of cases likely to be lying were what was used from my understanding vs what they had no evidence to suggest lying. The difference in the latter of course is that "not lying" vs "conviction" are distinctly different things.

Yes… but who judges “not lying”… data is all well and good.. but how accurate is it?

 

[Darth Shiv]

Yes… but who judges “not lying”… data is all well and good.. but how accurate is it?

It literally does not have to be 100% accurate. Even if they were 10% off and it was really 85%, that would still not account for the 90% unreporteds. We're still talking ~98.5% legit cases (reported legit and unreported) not achieving conviction. And the dataset/paper was peer reviewed.

Honestly there's a huge gap between what you are asking about and there being a useful point.

 

[Squid Surprise]

It literally does not have to be 100% accurate. Even if they were 10% off and it was really 85%, that would still not account for the 90% unreporteds. We're still talking ~98.5% legit cases (reported legit and unreported) not achieving conviction. And the dataset/paper was peer reviewed.

Honestly there's a huge gap between what you are asking about and there being a useful point.

Yes... but again... there is no way to accurately give a % of “not lying” or “true” since there is no way to ascertain it short of mind-reading...

I certainly agree with the premise - I just mistrust the numbers.