G
The very nature of steamos suggests otherwise.
Windows is an added barrier to entry - it costs money. Steamos is free.
The investment for a gaming PC then becomes the cost of the hardware.
Really? That's what you are going with? Well, to say that is laughable is an understatement! Last I checked Microsoft didn't get to know people on a first name basis, so the fact that they have insulted you somehow is quite miraculous to say the least. I cannot think of one possible reason that a company would single you out and do something to you, of all the millions of people out there, to have you hate them so. I am well aware of your dislike of, and I quote "Coloured pastel squares", but that is hardly fair to judge an optimised OS as great as Windows 8.1 but that very broad brush you are using.Because I'm growing tired of MS, end of story
What was the hardware capability of the $550 machine?Except Dell did it for $550 with Windows 8.1. Do you think other players will price theirs higher or lower?
What was the hardware capability of the $550 machine?
Would you shut up! I didn't come here making excuses for anyone else or start **** about MS. I stated my desire to move to Linux and you are defending MS for some damn reason.Really? That's what you are going with? Well, to say that is laughable is an understatement!
Nope, couldn't be farther from the truth. I find residence in South Africa, quite possibly the farthest place from anything to do with Microsoft. Albeit they do happen to have a presence here, its anything but large. I simply have no issue with them as a company, and fail to see why anyone would? I mean, what company doesn't try to make a profit? People claim to hate Microsoft then proclaim their undying love for a half baked OS like Linux (mind you, I do believe it to be a fair platform, just not even close to being for everyone, or as complete as it should be). TheBigFatClown that floats around this site may disagree with me, but the fall out over a simple start screen seems to have earned the ire of many people for what I can gather is no real reason beyond their own shortcomings and inability to adapt with changes to some software. Granted, I too believe the start screen could use some more polishing, however its not all as bad as people make it out to be. People tend to act like a broken telephone, they hear all bad things about something from those vocal few on forums like this without ever trying it themselves (and I don't mean a 10 minute session at a store), and next thing you know something as simple as a start screen is suddenly the bad guy, with everyone and their dog spewing their 100% influenced opinion about how bad something is. I'm sure what I just said may annoy a few, but lets just be honest, we have all seen perfectly good software or hardware go under the radar because it didn't quite measure up to those few writing some bad reviews based on their small opinion. Although, some of it may be justifiable.Written for Microsoft and by Microsoft personnel.....
move along please
Whoops, seems like I touched a raw nerve, my bad.Would you shut up! I didn't come here making excuses for anyone else or start **** about MS.
Perhaps, but that's the exact definition of a console wouldn't you say? Isn't that why consoles are as big as they are? What purpose could these Steam Machines fill when there is already something that fills the gap at a generally cheaper price point? There are already gaming class pc's out there at fairly good price points, but none of them are as cheap as a console. As mentioned before, why as an uninformed regular gamer would I want to buy something that's probably more complex than a console that you just plug in, switch on and game? Maybe this will result in cheaper console games, which by all accounts would eliminate the only reason I can think of building a living room gaming box - cheaper PC games, so if that advantage goes out the window, then what remains?Steam machines are basically pre-configured computers. lots of people don't game on computers because they don't know how to build a decent gaming pc.
since we have no idea what gpu is on the board we can't compare it to intels, but just drivers alone will give the nvidia chip a FPS boost.How would Iris 5300 Pro compare to this gpu?
Perhaps because ALL the games are already ON Windows? Perhaps its cheaper for all these studios to just offer a Windows device rather than spend millions porting all those games to a less than ideal platform (read that as simple to use). A very small percentage of gamers actually enjoy having to fiddle with something to get it exactly how you want it, by installing this or configuring that. Windows just works straight out the box, no mess, no fuss, and despite what you may think, It works well enough for most situations.Care to explain more rather than just stating something without adding any facts?