This is hardly surprising. Current gen of Intel processors are generally uncompetitive when looking at both performance and power consumption. They only sell better if Intel slash prices. In addition, Intel further fire at their own feet by saying that Rocket Lake will be a 6 to 8 months product which will be replaced by Alder Lake by end of the year. So it is likely that even Intel supporters are skipping Rocket Lake since the socket is a dead end.
AM4 is a dead end too then. Who cares about this. If a CPU can't last 4-5 years, it sucked from the beginning. Pointless for me. AMD users ramble about this all the time, especially Ryzen 1000 and 2000 buyers (mediocre CPUs), which have option to upgrade to 3000 series now, WHY THE NEED after only 1-2 years if your CPU was GOOD when you bought it? Hint; It was not. It sucked. Hence the price. 12nm GloFo was and is a terrible node. Worse than 14nm Intel by far.
Most Ryzen 300 and 400 series boards did not even get firmware to support 5000 series, or lack VRMs/power delivery to run Ryzen 5000 chips at peak clocks. Some did not even have room for the new firmwares on the ROM and new boards were released with bigger ROM storage... There's tons of threads with people having issues with old boards and a newer chip.
I have NEVER and I will NEVER re-use a motherboard. I buy a system, use it for 4-5 years and then replace it. GPU is every 2 years.
No "Intel Supporters" have any reason to upgrade to Rocket Lake.
A 8700K or 9900K at 5 GHz will perform identical to the new chips at same clockspeeds in 99% of stuff, especially gaming. People with those chips have zero reason to upgrade and watt usage is not high in regular gaming etc.
Only in synthetic burn-ins it will hit high numbers. You never see this in real-world usecases. Hell, Ryzen 5800X can get really hot too, is that a problem? For some it is. If you cooling sucks. 5900X and 5950X can get burning hot even at stock. Who cares if a CPU uses 150 or 250 watts, if performance is good. Get a good cooler and you will never notice. GPUs use like twice or even triple that.
My 9900K at 5.2 GHz hits like 125 watts in gaming on average, locked at 5.2 with no AVX offset. Absolutely smashing Ryzen 3000 series, only OC'ed 5000 series comes close in terms of performance, and I have had this chip for 3 years by now, haha almost 4 years in 3 months... Awesome chip that I have zero reason to replace before 1-2 years from now, where true next gen stuff is out and DDR5 + next gen platforms have matured. Ryzen 1000 and 2000 are considered pure trash for gaming thats why I don't mention them. Even a 5 year old Intel chip will demolish them in gaming.
For gaming and emulation Intel is still king. I do tons of emulation and AMD hardware is simply too wonky for me. Most emulators are heavily optimized for Intel + Nvidia and this is fact. Visit emulation forums if you are in doubt.
I tried my Ryzen 3600 (at 4.2 GHz using 3200/C14 memory) for gaming and it was ALOT slower in all games and emulators than my 9900K. It's now in my server, which was the reason it was bnought to begin with..