captaincranky
Posts: 20,144 +9,151
OK, here's a free tip, if you want to be taken seriously, at least learn how to spell, "W-A-K-E".
I would like you to make your sources of all these "hard facts" available to us. Otherwise it sounds like you're just blowing smoke up our collective a**, during a b*** s*** bombardment.
The overarching issue, as it was presented in the article being quoted, is still whether or not manga can be regarded as porographic. And that still remains as a reasonable topic for this forensic debate.
If this guy is screaming "Attica, Attica, Attica", to get the crowd on his side, so be it. But until then, it seems reasonable to believe that the comic book interests, must have some explanation or agenda for pursuing the case.
What intrigues me, is how quickly the figure of "$150,000" dollars was determined or generated for the individual's legal fund. That's the most suspicious part of the case to me, thus far. Because that sounds like a number generated by a bunch of blood sucking lawyers. And no, I have absolutely no intention of cutting them a check.
Another clue, this one to the "Attica" reference: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072890/
OK DUDE, I'M A-"WAIT".Ok WAIT THE HELL UP!...
Before you go all Kamikaze american style, the story is written to get a response from all of you who can't think deeper then black and white.
This guy has a criminal history with child pornography charges in the past... so... when his name came up in the system it was flagged as a "search" target.
During the search this "Manga" popped up with drawing of VERY young girls in sexual acts.
Upon finding these "Manga" material, it was seized under the grounds of a more through search since there was ALLOT of files and folders "Encrypted" and password protected with names that show pornographic nature.
Anyone on this forum would feel that, given his past with child pornography and material demeaned similar in nature, would warrant a deeper search into his computer to see if there is REAL child porn.... so stop you crying and starting to think bigger people!
I would like you to make your sources of all these "hard facts" available to us. Otherwise it sounds like you're just blowing smoke up our collective a**, during a b*** s*** bombardment.
The overarching issue, as it was presented in the article being quoted, is still whether or not manga can be regarded as porographic. And that still remains as a reasonable topic for this forensic debate.
If this guy is screaming "Attica, Attica, Attica", to get the crowd on his side, so be it. But until then, it seems reasonable to believe that the comic book interests, must have some explanation or agenda for pursuing the case.
What intrigues me, is how quickly the figure of "$150,000" dollars was determined or generated for the individual's legal fund. That's the most suspicious part of the case to me, thus far. Because that sounds like a number generated by a bunch of blood sucking lawyers. And no, I have absolutely no intention of cutting them a check.
Another clue, this one to the "Attica" reference: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072890/