Apple considering price hikes to secure supply of touch panels

[Emil]

Apple is considering paying higher prices to secure sufficient supply of touch panels used in its iOS devices, including the iPhone, the iPod touch, and the iPad. Cupertino has talked with Taiwan-based makers about increased quotes, according DigiTimes.

Read the whole story

 

[Rick]

"Apple considering price hikes" is a bit unclear. This is more of a "Apple is willing to pay more money" issue than "Apple is charging more" one.

It's important to point out that these 'price hikes' may not be passed on to consumers... This is simply a deal between Apple and manufacturers. Big companies often absorb temporary component price hikes without raising prices to consumers, in order to maintain an attractive, consistent (and still profitable) retail price.

 

[spydercanopus]

It would be a first to me if the consumer did -not- absorb the cost.

 

[Scshadow]

Oh yeah... really clean business practice. Pay higher price for touch screens so that vendors can force Apple competition to pay the higher price too(after all, they only represent a small portion of the market so they are in no position to bargain). Price hike the Ipad to cover costs. It doesn't look like my boycott of Apple products is going to end anytime soon.

 

[Guest]

Or rather, isn't this just the basis of standard supply and demand economics? If supply is constrained and demand increases then prices will go up in response. Nothing shady about it. It's unlikely that consumer prices for the Ipad will go up as apple won't want to mess with their current, easy to understand pricing scheme.

 

[captaincranky]

"Apple considering price hikes" is a bit unclear. This is more of a "Apple is willing to pay more money" issue than "Apple is charging more" one.

It's important to point out that these 'price hikes' may not be passed on to consumers... This is simply a deal between Apple and manufacturers. Big companies often absorb temporary component price hikes without raising prices to consumers, in order to maintain an attractive, consistent (and still profitable) retail price.

All that being said, I'm sure this will rapidly deteriorate ro a simple "chicken or the egg paradigm".

To wit, "which came first, Apple paying more for touch panels, or Apple raising retail prices"?

With that out of the way, I think its prudent to ask, "dear Lord, can Apple's retail prices even go any higher?

 

[SNGX1275]

Just a few weeks ago I think people were complaining that Apple is already taking up a large percentage of the panels and paying less. Which is pretty standard too, because if you can guarantee you are going to buy a lot of something you often get better deals - but most people here were pissed off at that.

Now what we have here is Apple saying that they'll pay more for the panels (likely from different suppliers now that Japan's production ability may be down) just to ensure they can still get what they need. Lots of people are going to be upset about this too.

spydercanopus - I will be really surprised if Apple increases their prices on the iPad2, iPhones, iPod Touches.

 

[captaincranky]

Just a few weeks ago I think people were complaining that Apple is already taking up a large percentage of the panels and paying less. Which is pretty standard too, because if you can guarantee you are going to buy a lot of something you often get better deals - but most people here were pissed off at that.

Now what we have here is Apple saying that they'll pay more for the panels (likely from different suppliers now that Japan's production ability may be down) just to ensure they can still get what they need. Lots of people are going to be upset about this too.

spydercanopus - I will be really surprised if Apple increases their prices on the iPad2, iPhones, iPod Touches.

It's quite easy to develop a market stifling fiasco out of this, even without consumer price increases! If Apple corners the market,(more or less) on panels, then Competitive products won't be produced, hence Apple doesn't raise consumer prices, but in turn sells more units, thereby making more money.

Then the double whammy: Since suppliers can get more from Apple than fair market value for their panels, they then raise prices to competitors, forcing their pricing strategy upward.. Since Apple's offerings are for the most part sky high but tentatively fixed, the ratio between their product and the competition decreases.

This is the kind of robber baron, land grab, money grab, commoodity grab, that used to go on before there where laws against it. And incidentally, the FTC hopefully will take a look at this dealing.

Apple is getting as arrogant as Google announcing underhanded dealings like this before they're actually undertaken.

 

[Guest]

Sooooo this will be an excuse we won't see lower tablet prices in the near future...maybe in the year 2015 we can actually pay what they are worth...about $299 or less

 

[captaincranky]

What part of "collusion" and "price fixing" did everybody miss here....?

 

[SNGX1275]

Perhaps I'm wrong, but I don't think someone buying 60% of the available supply from multiple manufacturers constitutes a breach of FTC rules. Especially not when there are many buyers.

 

[captaincranky]

Perhaps I'm wrong, but I don't think someone buying 60% of the available supply from multiple manufacturers constitutes a breach of FTC rules. Especially not when there are many buyers.

Surely even the site's chief Apple apologist / defender can grasp the concept of commodities manipulation in this scenario. Perhaps even understand that 60% of something is still a great majority. Toshiba has already been rung up on price fixing of memory modules, and so far as I know they're a big supplier of TFT product. Accordingly, they don't need much of a push to orient their pricing structure upward, even on their own tablet product.

So, this is price fixing and commodities manipulation on a fairly grand scale. Whether it rises to the level of illegality is something you might hash out with Apple's professional lawyers.