Geralt
Posts: 1,387 +2,213
People in this century thought we were different now, more civilized than in the 20th century. But they were wrong: We continue to be the same bunch of barbarians like before.
Here's a US journalist, interviewing random people on the streets of Mariupol in Ukraine, all of whom explain how they voted in the referendum, and why. (spoiler: all but one voted for Russian annexation). Their comments about how the media intentionally misrepresents them are particularly poignantDa. Da. Da. Da.
Here's a US journalist, interviewing random people on the streets of Mariupol in Ukraine, all of whom explain how they voted in the referendum, and why. (spoiler: all but one voted for Russian annexation). Their comments about how the media intentionally misrepresents them are particularly poignant
You're right that is inexcusablehis videos were also featured on international media like the Associated Press, ITN, Skynews, Reuters, SPIEGEL TV
Still refusing to use those critical thinking skills? All source citations refer back to Bellingcat. The "scene" in this case is an IED attack which Bellingcat suspects was staged by Russian forces. An attack which Lancaster reported. Is it so? Quite possibly. Both sides are staging a number of attacks and "atrocities", and I know of more than a dozen events staged by Ukrainian forces, which were breathlessly repeated by Western media. Does that mean we should automatically discount AP, NBC, and the NY Times as "Ukrainian propapagandists"?the scene in at least one of Lancaster's videos was staged. all source material and citations are at the bottom
Wasting time with you is like trying to cure an addict.Still refusing to use those critical thinking skills, eh? All source citations inevitably refer back to the organization Bellingcat. The "scene" in this case is an IED attack which Bellingcat strongly suspects was staged by Russian forces. An attack which Lancaster reported. Is it true? Quite possibly. Both sides are doing this, and I know of more than a dozen attacks and other events staged by Ukrainian forces, all of which were breathlessly repeated by Western media. Does that mean we should automatically discount AP, NBC, and the NY Times as "Ukrainian propapagandists"?
And nothing you say can hide the fact that Ukraine has been fighting a civil war the past decade against its ethnic Russian citizens, people whom Ukraine stripped of the right to vote, to hold political office, and even to speak their own language. Is Russia aiding the separatists? Sure. But that begs the question on why they so desperately wish to separate in the first place, doesn't it? And it also clearly demonstrates that a huge percentage of the people in Donbas don't wish to be Ukrainian.
As early as 2015, the EU and even the US Congress sanctioned ultranationalist paramilitary groups like the swastika-wearing Azov Battalion for their acts of terror against civilians in Donbas. How did the Ukrainian government react to that? They officially integrated Azov into their armed forces. There's an entire park devoted to the child victims of these forces -- some killed in raids on villages by Azov, others by artillery shelling of civilian areas. I visited this park myself a few years ago. Perhaps you should visit it as well:
Alley of Angels in Donetsk (Donetsk) Essential Tips and Information
The Alley of Angels in Donetsk, Ukraine is a memorial for children of Donbas killed during the War in Donbas. At the entrance there is an arch...trek.zone
Historically with Russia this has also gone the other way - in attempts to assert control over regions like Ukraine, or the Baltic states, Russians were settled in an attempt to assimilate those areas, often over the objections and resentment of their native cultures and peoples, an imperial practice the Irish parts of my family is all too familiar with.Nothing you say can hide the fact that Ukraine has been fighting a civil war the past decade against its ethnic Russian citizens, people whom Ukraine stripped of the right to vote, to hold political office, and even to speak their own language. Is Russia aiding the separatists? Sure. But that begs the question on why they so desperately wish to separate in the first place. And it also clearly demonstrates that a huge percentage of the people in Donbas don't wish to be Ukrainian.
Very true. In the case of Crimea, the Russian population there settled in during the 1800s, displacing Tartars after the Crimean War. Crimea was gifted to Ukraine in 1954 by Khrushchev, who was himself Ukrainian. In his autobiography (which was required reading for me during school), he called it his "birthday present" to Ukraine.Historically with Russia this has also gone the other way - in attempts to assert control over regions like Ukraine, or the Baltic states, Russians were settled in an attempt to assimilate those areas...
When Ukraine can produce even one of the bodies of the "400 assassins" they killed who they claim Russia sent after Zelensky, they can speak. Or perhaps you'd like to discuss the "Snake Island massacre", in which all the dead victims later turned up alive. Or Ukraine's claim that the West had "only hours" to prevent Russia from intentionally detonating the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant. Or their claim that Russia "poisoned our delegates to the peace talks" ... but that those delegates were "too busy" to seek medical attention, or even to have a simple blood test to determine what they'd been given.Let's let everyone do their homework. Especially on the staged attack...
I'm glad you noticed that the referendum conducted in Ukraine's Eastern border provinces was an obvious sham. The footage was taken by Russian state media (Channel One) and meant for a Russian audience. Do you think anyone left in Russia has the presence of mind to notice the blank forms?Here's a US journalist, interviewing random people on the streets of Mariupol in Ukraine, all of whom explain how they voted in the referendum, and why. (spoiler: all but one voted for Russian annexation). Their comments about how the media intentionally misrepresents them are particularly poignant
Never seen one of these elections in person, have you? People are told to place the form in the appropriate ballot box: one box for yes, the other for no. The checks on the back are a backup, which many people never bother to fill in. When the boxes are opened, each box is counted separately ... which is why the woman in the clip isn't bothering to read each form individually. Surely you're intelligent enough to realize that, if the separatists wished to generate fake ballots, they'd have been sure the forms appeared valid before allowing them to be filmed.Do you think anyone left in Russia has the presence of mind to notice the blank forms?
Never seen one of these elections in person, have you? People are told to place the form in the appropriate ballot box: one box for yes, the other for no. The checks on the back are a backup, which many people never bother to fill in. When the boxes are opened, each box is counted separately ... which is why the woman in the clip isn't bothering to read each form individually. Surely you're intelligent enough to realize that, if the separatists wished to generate fake ballots, they'd have been sure the forms appeared valid before allowing them to be filmed.
I can't personally speak to the level of support for separatism today. However, as of a few years ago, I know for a fact that in Donbas it varied from 50 to 75%, and in Crimea it was easily 95% pro-Russian. Has six months of war changed that? I don't know ... but this food-for-fools Ukrainian propaganda clip certainly isn't evidence one way or another.
Just to point out, Patrick Lancaster has videos going back to 2014 pushing for Russia to retake this territory. He has a STRONG pro-Russia slant in every video he posts, and has even gone on ride-alongs with the Russian military. His videos are not objective, and I would not take anything away from watching 10 minutes of these clips any more than I would take anything away from watching 10 minutes of Fox News.Here's a US journalist, interviewing random people on the streets of Mariupol in Ukraine, all of whom explain how they voted in the referendum, and why. (spoiler: all but one voted for Russian annexation). Their comments about how the media intentionally misrepresents them are particularly poignant
And CNN, MSNBC, and most other US outlets have stories going back to 2014 pushing equally hard in favor of Ukraine. By your logic, we should discount all their reporting as well.Just to point out, Patrick Lancaster has videos going back to 2014 pushing for Russia to retake this territory.
You're welcome to buy a ticket and fly over to Ukraine. Zelensky's got a rifle waiting for you.
In the meantime, I'd prefer it if you didn't get me and everyone I know killed in a thermonuclear holocaust, thanks.
And CNN, MSNBC, and most other US outlets have stories going back to 2014 pushing equally hard in favor of Ukraine. By your logic, we should discount all their reporting as well.
The situation in Luhansk is certainly a gray area, but in Donetsk and especially Crimea it's a different matter. I personally was in Crimea shortly before their referendum. After the 2014 coup, you literally could not find a single person who didn't wish -- loudly and fervently -- to rejoin Russia. US reports of Russian troops forcing frightened people to vote in favor at gunpoint were absurd propaganda, period. A 98% in-favor vote isn't surprising at all.
Now, if Luhansk is reporting a 96% in-favor vote to rejoin Russia, then either the separatists are stacking ballots, or the anti-Russian citizens of the region aren't voting. Sure. That still doesn't change the fact that a majority of the people in the region are ethnic Russians, who consider themselves "Rus", not Ukrainian, and have been fighting a civil war for a decade to rejoin Russia -- in large part due to Ukraine's brutul repression of ethnic minorities in the country. Are you aware that President Poroshenko -- the so-called "Butcher of Donbas" -- used to drive around the country in vehicles plasted with enormous placards of his hero, the infamous Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera? Did you realize why the initial Russian effort focused so heavily on Mariupol, and the "Azov-Stol Mill"? If you research a bit about the Azov Brigade which made its home there - a swastika-bearing paramilitary group sanctioned by both the EU and the US Congress for its acts of terror against the ethnic Russian Jews of Donbas -- you might understand why.
And CNN, MSNBC, and most other US outlets have stories going back to 2014 pushing equally hard in favor of Ukraine. By your logic, we should discount all their reporting as well.
The situation in Luhansk is certainly a gray area, but in Donetsk and especially Crimea it's a different matter. I personally was in Crimea shortly before their referendum. After the 2014 coup, you literally could not find a single person who didn't wish -- loudly and fervently -- to rejoin Russia. US reports of Russian troops forcing frightened people to vote in favor at gunpoint were absurd propaganda, period. A 98% in-favor vote isn't surprising at all.
Now, if Luhansk is reporting a 96% in-favor vote to rejoin Russia, then either the separatists are stacking ballots, or the anti-Russian citizens of the region aren't voting. Sure. That still doesn't change the fact that a majority of the people in the region are ethnic Russians, who consider themselves "Rus", not Ukrainian, and have been fighting a civil war for a decade to rejoin Russia -- in large part due to Ukraine's brutul repression of ethnic minorities in the country. Are you aware that President Poroshenko -- the so-called "Butcher of Donbas" -- used to drive around the country in vehicles plasted with enormous placards of his hero, the infamous Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera? Did you realize why the initial Russian effort focused so heavily on Mariupol, and the "Azov-Stol Mill"? If you research a bit about the Azov Brigade which made its home there - a swastika-bearing paramilitary group sanctioned by both the EU and the US Congress for its acts of terror against the ethnic Russian Jews of Donbas -- you might understand why.
Bad example. Anyone who has the sense God gave a peanut would vote against everyone getting a "free" million dollars. Did you skip economics entirely?Lol. 98% is "not surprising? In what democratically legit election or poll has anything gotten 98%? You could have a referendum that simply says "do you want everyone in the country to each get a free 1,000,000 dollars!" And you'd get 10 or 15% vote no just for the "memes".
Educate yourself:Though I figured you might find it at least a little odd that ukraine has had zero issues gettinf volunteers...
Honestly its usually easy to tell the "bad guy" from the "good guy" in a conflict like this with one simple question: Does the country in question have to lock people *in* or lock them *out*? If it has to lock its own people in, well there is probably a fairly good reason they want out.
"Ukraine bans all male citizens ages 18 to 60 from leaving the country..."
""In particular, it is forbidden for men aged 18-60, Ukraine citizens, to leave the borders of Ukraine," a statement from the service said, according to CNN. "This regulation will remain in effect for the period of the legal regime of martial law. We ask the citizens to take this information into consideration.""
Reports: Ukraine bans all male citizens ages 18 to 60 from leaving the country
According to reports, male citizens ages 18 to 60 are prohibited from leaving Ukraine under martial law as Russia presses its full-scale invasion.www.usatoday.com
Was the US being invaded when it attacked Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Serbia, Libya, Grenada, Yemen, or a half-dozen other nations?Is Russia being invaded?
I do wish there was a good source of objective coverage. *Usually* when there's some topic where the US "old media" is going to put ridiculous amounts of spin on it, I can fall back to BBC coverage. But that is not going to help in this case.And CNN, MSNBC, and most other US outlets have stories going back to 2014 pushing equally hard in favor of Ukraine. By your logic, we should discount all their reporting as well.
The situation in Luhansk is certainly a gray area, but in Donetsk and especially Crimea it's a different matter. I personally was in Crimea shortly before their referendum. After the 2014 coup, you literally could not find a single person who didn't wish -- loudly and fervently -- to rejoin Russia. US reports of Russian troops forcing frightened people to vote in favor at gunpoint were absurd propaganda, period. A 98% in-favor vote isn't surprising at all.
Now, if Luhansk is reporting a 96% in-favor vote to rejoin Russia, then either the separatists are stacking ballots, or the anti-Russian citizens of the region aren't voting. Sure. That still doesn't change the fact that a majority of the people in the region are ethnic Russians, who consider themselves "Rus", not Ukrainian, and have been fighting a civil war for a decade to rejoin Russia -- in large part due to Ukraine's brutul repression of ethnic minorities in the country. Are you aware that President Poroshenko -- the so-called "Butcher of Donbas" -- used to drive around the country in vehicles plasted with enormous placards of his hero, the infamous Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera? Did you realize why the initial Russian effort focused so heavily on Mariupol, and the "Azov-Stol Mill"? If you research a bit about the Azov Brigade which made its home there - a swastika-bearing paramilitary group sanctioned by both the EU and the US Congress for its acts of terror against the ethnic Russian Jews of Donbas -- you might understand why.
True, and that someone is you. Here we are only 3 days later.... And now this:I'm not the one openly advocating escalation, even if it means nuclear war, now am I?
I truly don't understand why, in this age of easily-obtainable information, certain people delight in remaining ignorant. Is it a security belief for you? 15 years ago, Putin was by far the most popular democratically-elected leader in the world. He lost a great deal of support over that period-- but the war in Ukraine has so far boosted his popularity, not reduced it.
Why Vladimir Putin still has widespread support in Russia
There’s no question the Russian population is subject to a Russian media largely loyal to the Kremlin. But that doesn’t mean Vladimir Putin lacks genuine supporters.theconversation.com
Six Months On, Most Russians Still Back the War in Ukraine
Polls suggest that more than three-quarters of Russians continue to back Putin's war efforts.time.com
Was the US being invaded when it attacked Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Serbia, Libya, Grenada, Yemen, or a half-dozen other nations?
Indeed. I support Ukraine in this conflict, however I do find these kinds of actions troubling from either side. Hopefully, they focus on those who were calling in shell positions and so on (actually collaborating) and give those who were just voicing their opinion a slap on the wrist and let them go.Bad example. Anyone who has the sense God gave a peanut would vote against everyone getting a "free" million dollars. Did you skip economics entirely?
By your logic, all the unanimous and near-unanimous votes in Congress are proof the US is run by a dictatorial regime. You have to understand the situation in Crimea at the time. The population there is almost entirely ethnic Russian, yet the pro-Russian government in Kiev had just been violently overthrown, and the new President was promising to "enact revenge" against any and all Russians ... a promise he soon made good on. The people of Crimea were in a panic -- I was there shortly before the referendum, and I saw a line of Crimean citizens more than two miles long outside the Russian consulate there: people desperate to apply for Russian residency. And none of this, of course, even takes into account the systemic issues with Ukraine: incredibly high corruption, and an economy so shattered that 50% of all transactions were occurring on the black market, and millions of Ukrainians illegally crossing into Russia just to find work.
Educate yourself:
"The UN has urged Ukraine to take a “compassionate and humane” approach to the martial law after reports of Ukrainian men defying orders to stay and attempting to cross into neighbouring countries to claim asylum....Men of conscription age, aged 18 to 60, were banned from leaving Ukraine after the Russian invasion but there have been multiple reports of Ukrainian men trying to cross into Hungary, Poland and Romania...Ukrainian authorities [are] checking everyone trying to cross to ensure no men with Ukrainian nationality are passing through.
You may find this interesting as well:
"Ukrainian forces track down, arrest citizens for pro-Russian views online....Ukrainian security forces tracked down and arrested citizens under new anti-collaboration laws that criminalize [the] public voicing support for the Russian side....Zelenskyy has even stripped two SBU generals of their rank, accusing them of treason. A “registry of collaborators” is being compiled and will be released to the public,..."
Over the weekend, the Associated Press reported Ukraine’s SBU security service had arrested hundreds of alleged violators of these new anti-collaboration laws, including about 400 people in the Kharkiv region alone....
Ukraine cracks down on 'traitors' helping Russian troops
Ukrainian authorities are cracking down on anyone suspected of aiding Russian troops under laws enacted by Ukraine’s parliament and signed by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy after the Feb. 24 invasion.apnews.com