Fine, I'll clarify!
Your head, not mine. I never once stated my opinion was of the same nature as yours. I never once based your opinion as fact. In fact I made it quite clear, I thought you didn't have any sense of right and wrong, if you allow for shades of gray. As if beating someone is perfectly OK, as long as you don't kill them. But this is all besides the point. The topic is about Satya Nadella. And my opinion will never change about Millionaires (Billionaires are even worse) hording money as being outright unethical for the greater good of all.....[ ]....
Once upon time, "eminent domain" was the law on the land. A person or family couldn't bequeath real estate property to the heirs or assigns. Property ownership reverted back to the king, With the signature of King John of England on the Magna Carta, all of that changed. Now, we have ruling class people, (what would have formerly been nobles, getting filthy rich off our largest corporations). The only thing that has changed, is now a person may rise to the level of a king, with nary a drop of blood shed.
Nonetheless, these are bloodless battles, that precious few are equipped to fight. Perhaps a lack of avarice or ambition deny upward mobility. In some, a lack of intellect or creative, relevant, thought, impede their progress.
One thing that remains constant is this jealousy and bitterness of those left behind. The question continually oscillating back and forth between, "why him", to, "why not me".
Then there is the hypocrisy of man's institutions, the Roman Catholic Church being the most manifold and manifest offender. The Catholic chirch possesses enormous wealth and lands. But those who serve it, must take vows of poverty and chastity.
...[ ].... And my opinion will never change about Millionaires (Billionaires are even worse) hording money as being outright unethical for the greater good of all...[ ]...
You understand these are the basic tenets of Communism, don't you? Decades ago when "freedom of speech" was a cruel joke, Sen. McCarthy would have you brought before him to, confess to your "crime think".
That said, Communism isn't that bad of an idea. I mean, stripping us of our vanities, distributing wealth equally, and having the entire world run on a, "all for one, one for all", legally dictated mandate.
The trouble with that is, true Communism has never been implemented. The "closest thing to Communisism", existed as the USSR, or so their people were deluded / brainwashed into believing. In the end, that was a military dictatorship, with only members of the "ruling class", sharing the wealth and determining the direction of the "people".
Mankind exists as a cruel, ironic, dichotomy! Simultaneously as a herd animal, and as the most avaricious, most feared, keystone predator, to ever bear witness to planet earth..
Capitalism exists as an ideal, where anyone may benefit from self deterministic endeavor.. Good luck with that. 99% of the population has neither the skills, talent, imagination, birthright, or the charisma, to make capitalism fully work on their behalf. And that self same 99% are, "content", to sit around and envy the rich while cursing their own fate. After all, isn't that why we had to invent, "heaven"? Making sure the transition to dust would fulfill our lofty goals, and the need for peace and well being. We'll all be rich in heaven boys and girls, count on it.
In the meantime, "don't worry, be happy".