The truly competent should know both methods and in which situations one is preferable over the other. Using disk/partition images is an example of working smarter, not harder.
Well, this is mostly a semantic point. Imaging a drive and
then installing from the image, IS "reformatting and reinstalling", simply doing it ahead of time.
However, since you're not about to render a 1 terabyte image of you OS, programs, and years and years worth of files on your machine, you surely do need to take care the malware, isn't among those files. Since, the first time you open an infected video or PDF, the fun begins all over again.
Before you jump ship, understand the difference between Reactive (the most common) and Proactive protection.
Welcome to the age of the social entitlement ninny. So much freeware gets lost each year, simply because the free versions are too good, and for most people sufficient. Hence nobody buys the paid version. On behalf of myself, I'm as guilty of that as the next person. I don't however, think I'm entitled to it. Although I am, very, very grateful for it.
Speaking directly to AVG Free, I've used it successfully for years. During the same time period, I've listened to all the FUD blown up against it, by every know-it-all on this website. "Clever things", keep getting repeated over and over again. For example, "AVG means ain't very good". Right.
:rolleyes: I've had Avira, which is mostly adware these days. I've had Avast also, which dies as easy as anything else when confronted with competent malware. Mercifully, Norton and McAfee don't have free issues.
In any event, AVG flat out warns you in advance they're going to sell your information, and in the very next breath, tells you they're going to allow you to opt out of it.
:wink: :wink: :wink:: My question is, how do you manage to pass yourself off as a "victim", when you've been freeloading for years, and if you're the least bit "smart", you can likely freeload for the next decade or so as well?
Even regarding the "doomsday scenario", whereby AV manufacturers are writing the malware they pretend to defend against, WTF does it matter, when they provide the "free medicine" to cure what ails ya?
Besides, "NoScript" is a huge part of my protection package. And it's not an "ad blocker" per se. If your malware needs a script to run, and somebody else's ad needs a script to run, then the baby gets thrown out with the bathwater. No skin off my a**, I don't like children.