Battlefield 3's Caspian Border map opens to PC beta testers

And the amount of FPS players nearly tripled with halo. rage more?
ummmm not really console games suck the first halo did not start **** maybe halo 2 but who cares consoles sucks for fps online play especially since they are so handicapped and have aim assist lol
 
ikesmasher said:
klepto12 said:
ikesmasher said:
Guest said:
You guys do realise that Ps3 and Xbox are getting Caspian Border aswell as all the other maps pc gets they are just a bit smaller the pc gets 64 player caspian while ps3/box gets it as 24 or 34 players. Hence they are both getting all the same maps only advantage is that ps3 gets the dlc 'Back to kankard' almoust right away while others will have to wait >,>

Besaids you people need to understand that shooter games are always ment for PC, the concole versions are made for those who cant afford to update pc drivers to run modern games. Shooter games envole over pc, why? Simply cos majority plays pc so ofc they satisfy the pc gamers by giving them wide 64 player maps. Should they give those maps for concoles they would have around 3-4 maps full and then rest would miss players thats why concoles get maps 50% smaller than the pc version of the map as well as max player cap from 24 to 34. This way concole players get to be happy aswell you need to realise that concole controls for Jets,Helis,Tanks,Trucks,Jeeps etc are all messed up and not as perfect as pc can offer. And thats why concole also gets 50% less vehicles there was a teaser for one larger map for ps3 they had 2 tanks 2 Anti aircraft tanks 1 jeep 1 heli for that map while same map teaser for pc had 4 tanks 4 anti 2 jeeps 4 helis why? Cos pc has more players thus more **** to drive and do.

You all just need to accept the fact that shooter games are ment for pc.

the flaws in the post are so obvious. To start, if halo kicked off the FPS genre, why was it originally on xbox? shooter games first kicked off on consoles. Not saying they don't work better for PCs, but seriously.
wtf are you smoking you ***** FPS games came out on PC ever heard of quake, duke nukem, castle wolfenstien serious sam and many many more that predate shitty halo game that came out in 2001?

And the amount of FPS players nearly tripled with halo. rage more?

No, they tripled in turms of FPS's being churned out for Consoles. PC Exclusive FPS's were coming out at the same rate.

All Halo did was make FPS popular on the Console.
 
"And the amount of FPS players nearly tripled with halo. rage more?"

Tripled the number of consoletard FPS players. Halo was awful to people who have actually played a PC FPS before, but new and exciting to the console derps that never have.
 
bleh im not a fan of fps games i played the beta for 20 minutes and got bored, I like to run to action n fight, being shot in the back by campers gets old quick, maybe ill check out the 120 player maps
 
I give up. the amount of bias in your posts is outstanding.
Although I have to agree that the amount of bullet magnetism/aim assist makes the games stupidly easy (at least for me) which invites a larger group of not exactly mature players. Actually, nearly everyone else that plays xbox anymore is...nevermind. But hopefully SOMEONE sees my original point.
 
i am PC and Xbox gamer so i get all the exclusive stuff lol and 's still okay but unless you don't unlock stuff for the vehicles it's not fun
 
I give up. the amount of bias in your posts is outstanding.
Although I have to agree that the amount of bullet magnetism/aim assist makes the games stupidly easy (at least for me) which invites a larger group of not exactly mature players. Actually, nearly everyone else that plays xbox anymore is...nevermind. But hopefully SOMEONE sees my original point.

The whole point is that you didnt know what you were talking about.
 
klepto12 said:
I give up. the amount of bias in your posts is outstanding.
Although I have to agree that the amount of bullet magnetism/aim assist makes the games stupidly easy (at least for me) which invites a larger group of not exactly mature players. Actually, nearly everyone else that plays xbox anymore is...nevermind. But hopefully SOMEONE sees my original point.

The whole point is that you didnt know what you were talking about.
The whole point is that you are simply saying that because you are uneducated AND you are extremely biased toward consoles, so you simply wish to call me an ***** instead of realize that you are wrong.
 
i have owned almost every console that has come out and i still prefer fps on the PC the fact of the matter is that HALO did not do **** for anything FPS games came out in early 90s halo didnt start anything in which case you are wrong like i said. So next time you post a comment make sure it is fact before you post it thanks. thanks for trolling sir now please leave!!!! and i understand what you meant but to be completely honest the game that started it for consoles was 007: Goldeneye for N64 which came out in 1997 four years prior to Halo.
 
@Guest tbh current consoles are now many many years old BF3 the console version is pushing it to its limits. They have't half the map loads because fewer ppl would play certain maps its simply because the consoles can't handle it. They have already had to dumb down the graphics to cope. Also remember very few console games are true "HD" (by HD I mean 1920x1080) the vast majority as games are upscalled. On the other hand PC gamers have been doing "HD" since before ppl refered to it as "HD" it was simply called "HI Res"

PCS were playing FPS style games before the massive console war debate. As it stands at the moment the PC simply prevails not going into a big console vs pc war but anything who things a 10 yr old console is faster etc than a 10 day old pc is a complete retard
 
Came here looking for comments on the map, since i was not able to play this weekend, but got this crappy fight. This PC x Console fps gameplay fight is getting so old for something so damn obvious.
 
Here is the problem with these fueds. People make outrageous claims without substantiating them. If you are to make a "factual" call, then ellaborate with some evidence. At least then if we are to continue these debates over who did what fist/better/when then we can make them more interesting and definatly more intelligent.

No bias, however, loyal pc fans are most likely to do this as their experience weighs heavier than console only players. And most genres were indeed "created" on PC. Thats not to say that games are constantly being revolutionised on both platforms. And for this we all benefit, Halo was, in my opinion as an old-school pc user, a great game. It actually gave players one of the best team based combat experiences i have seen up until that point. Though it far from created the genre,

We should all enjoy and unite in our gaming experiences, not bicker and fued in what seperates us, but rather attempt to work together in a united effort towards gearing the developers into making what we want, not what is just socially "acceptable" on a mass scale. I love playing on my pc and my PS3. They both offer different experiences and allow a broader scope of genres. And as long as games are made for gamers and not "the stock market" I will continue to support the dev's.

cheers for taking the time to read...
 
Back