CERN's particle accelerator tech is being reimagined to blast cancer in under a second

zohaibahd

Posts: 934   +19
Staff
Forward-looking: There's an exciting new cancer treatment on the horizon called Flash radiotherapy that could shake up the field as we know it. Rather than delivering radiation over several minutes like current techniques, Flash supercharges traditional radiotherapy by blasting tumors with an extremely intense dose of radiation in under a second.

While it may not sound like a major leap, this approach offers one big advantage: killing cancerous cells while doing less damage to surrounding healthy tissue. This is believed to occur because healthy tissues can better withstand the rapid dose than cancer cells.

Early experiments on healthy lab mice are promising and have already proven that the rodents don't develop the typical side effects, even after two rounds of radiation.

The work behind Flash radiotherapy is being bolstered by an unlikely source: CERN, the particle physics lab famous for the Large Hadron Collider. While the concept of Flash originated from radiobiologists over a decade ago, CERN is adapting its particle accelerators – originally designed for smashing atoms – to deliver radiation at ultra-high speeds for cancer treatment

Billy Loo, who runs the Flash lab at Stanford University, stated to the BBC that Flash produces less normal tissue injury than conventional irradiation without compromising anti-tumor efficacy. This would prove especially useful for treatments aimed at more delicate areas, like the brain, which is typically treated at a high cost.

As Dr. Marie-Catherine Vozenin from Geneva University Hospitals explained to the BBC, "We're able to cure kids with brain tumors, but the price they pay is high – things like lifelong anxiety, depression and significant loss of IQ."

If successful, Flash may allow higher cure rates for notoriously deadly cancers like glioblastoma brain tumors.

Flash could also allow higher radiation doses to tackle tough-to-treat cancers that have spread to other organs. With conventional radiotherapy, doctors often can't go as far as they'd like over fears of collateral damage. But Flash could make more aggressive treatments viable.

Human trials of Flash are already underway at various hospitals around the world. For instance, the Cincinnati Children's Hospital in Ohio, US, is planning an early-stage trial involving children with metastatic cancer that has spread to their chest bones.

For now, most of these treatments are using protons as the radiation particle since proton therapy machines can be adapted for Flash delivery. But researchers are also exploring other particles like carbon ions and electrons.

Once human trials prove fruitful, addressing accessibility will be another challenge. Equipment required for such therapy is massive in size and hugely expensive, limiting its availability to more sophisticated hospitals. Carbon ion therapy hardware can even be building-sized.

Making Flash cheaper and improving accessibility is a challenge CERN is working on by collaborating with hospitals and companies. The ultimate goal is to make it possible for any hospital with radiotherapy equipment to provide Flash.

There's still a lot of research to be done, of course, and the risks of Flash are being studied. But the early signs are enough to get oncologists excited.

Permalink to story:

 
Fatal is always fatal. It may take longer without the treatment, but it is coming. ;) On the other hand, are the cancerous genes still there, even after successful treatment?
 
Also a ton of risk of fatal damage to cancer patients if calculations aren't correct.
That's already happened in the past with incidents like the Therac-25 machines andbtheir dodgy software, I'd imagine the industry has learned fairly well now as to the risks etc. involved
 
Also a ton of risk of fatal damage to cancer patients if calculations aren't correct.
It was successfully tested on mice. You could take a chunk of brain out of a human the size of the entire mouse brain and still be fine.

If it's precise enough to cure a mouse then the safety margins for humans don't sound like an issue. And the thing in hospitals is that they tend to check things rather thoroughly checking everything thrice.
There probably won't be much manual calculations involved either this most likely will be the job of a piece of software.
The thing with software is that even if it goes wrong it can be fixed so even if it's off to a rough start eventually it's guaranteed to do more good than harm.
 
Back