China to launch an 'artificial moon' into orbit by 2020

Can't believe I'm reading so many negative comments.
Are you all jealous?

If the United States did this, it would be like: "Amazing project, very ecological project to save energy, it could be reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the long run". This is freaking solar energy. Isn't everyone and his grandma swearing on solar energy? Well, this is it.

But since China is working on it, I read only negative, very stupid comments from butthurt people. Jealousy coming out from all pores. Incredible.
Yes, this is a neat idea, a big idea, a visionary idea. What bothers me about it is the sheer temerity of placing a new, super bright star that, if I understand the situation correctly (and I might not), would be visible in everyone's sky, all over the world. It would give astronomers apoplexy, and would compromise the sanctity of the sky, which is still, I think, something that everybody values.

However, if it actually is the case that it could only be seen locally then I take it all back. Cities are bright anyway, obscuring almost all the stars.

How would something like this fare in the U.S.? There'd be fierce opposition from one party or another. Utility companies, maybe? (Although they seem intent on reducing electricity usage so they don't have to build new power plants.) Whatever, the autocratic government in China, for better or worse, makes grand projects possible that wouldn't be possible elsewhere.
 
China will have to go ahead and deploy first, to see why it was such a bad idea. Screwing with the environment to such a great deal. Light has more affect on us than many realize.
Absolutely!

World history is full of ideas that were thought great that were then discovered to be some of the worst ideas in history. Take drinking from lead cups as one of the worst. What might sound great on paper has to be tested first. While there are potential benefits from this, until it is done, no one will know whether the benefits outweigh the impacts, and if the impacts do outweigh the benefits, by how much.

And after having that Chinese space station come crashing to earth last year (IIRC), who knows whether they will actually be successful in putting the thing up there and having it stay up there.
 
However, if it actually is the case that it could only be seen locally then I take it all back. Cities are bright anyway, obscuring almost all the stars.
To me, the effects of the light sound like they will only be local. However, even those localized effects may have more of an impact than a benefit.
 
"The controllable moon could also be useful during disasters and blackout situations." AND even more useful in weapons strikes, surveillance, and if properly shielded and packed with highly contaminated waste - the worlds largest dirty bomb!
It's the Death-star all over again!!!!!
 
I'm looking forward to this because it won't work. Just like all the other crap schemes that people float which work on the micro-scale and then fail to scale up to industrial levels while maintaining efficiency, especially *cost* efficiency.

The most that will come of this is more orbital debris. C'mon China, prove me wrong!
 
"The controllable moon could also be useful during disasters and blackout situations." AND even more useful in weapons strikes, surveillance, and if properly shielded and packed with highly contaminated waste - the worlds largest dirty bomb!
Not only that, but this will be the start of colonizing the upper atmosphere ala the South China Sea artificial islands as extensions of Red Chinese "territory". Reminds me a bit of the original Buck Rogers novel, "Armageddon 2419 AD", written in 1927, with its "air lords of Han [China]". Kind of spooky foretelling...
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/ar...p-francis-nowlan/1013858169?ean=9781504045315
 
Why do they aim big when they can't take care of their earthly problems like pollution, over population, and poverty?
 
Why do they aim big when they can't take care of their earthly problems like pollution, over population, and poverty?

Actually you're wrong. Maybe you were talking about India, which is out of control by any merit. Because China has managed to control the population growth very efficiently. China's population growth rate is only 0.59%, ranking 159th in the world.

Yes, they have lower population growth rate than United States. And this is according to CIA's public data. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2002.html

If CIA had to admit that China's population growth is lower than US, that means real data is probably even better in favor of China. Because CIA always fudges the statistics to make their enemies look worse and their allies better. That's why Albania always looks good in stats, and is being advertised in media, despite in reality being a horrible country, very dangerous for visitors. While China and Iran always look bad in media, despite being regional leaders. But even according to the fudged CIA data, China still has lower population growth than US. So... maybe you should ask another government to control their population. Like United States. Or India.
 
Population growth doesn't mean they don't have a **** load of people. They have so many people they have no more room to grow and hence their slow growth. So no, I'm not wrong. Even if I am wrong, I was making a point. Same problem with the U.S. Always trying to solve the world's problems but can't fix the problems at home.
 
Back