Coin-sized nuclear 3V battery with 50-year lifespan enters mass production

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 579   +13
Staff
Something to look forward to: A Chinese battery manufacturer has developed a breakthrough, sparking a worldwide race for compact nuclear energy. The innovation is a small coin-sized battery powered by a radioactive nickel isotope that decays into stable copper. While the initial cell is relatively weak, it can easily be layered to provide more power for up to 50 years.

Energy storage technology has reached a transformative milestone as the BV100, a miniature atomic energy battery, enters mass production. Popular Mechanics notes that the coin-sized cell from Beijing Betavolt New Energy Technology can provide juice lasting up to 50 years without charging or maintenance.

The tech represents a significant leap toward practical and scalable nuclear power solutions. The innovation positions Betavolt as a global leader in the race to commercialize nuclear batteries, a field in which companies from China, the U.S., and Europe fiercely compete. Betavolt's success has already garnered recognition within China's scientific community. The company won third prize at the China National Nuclear Corporation's 2023 Innovation Competition and has registered patents domestically while preparing global filings under the PCT framework.

This breakthrough began last year when Betavolt unveiled the BV100 as the first nuclear battery to integrate China's fourth-generation diamond semiconductor technology. The BV100 harnesses energy from the radioactive decay of its nickel-63 core. The two-micron thick core, sandwiched between two 10-micron thick diamond semiconductors, efficiently converts the isotope's decay into electricity. Its modular structure allows for scalability, with multiple units combined in series or parallel to create batteries of varying sizes and capacities.

Compact yet powerful, the BV100 is about the size of a small coin and delivers a power output of 100 microwatts at 3 volts. While its current capacity is insufficient for high-energy devices like smartphones or laptops, Betavolt envisions applications combining multiple batteries to meet greater demands. The company plans to launch a more powerful one-watt version later this year, with uses ranging from consumer electronics to drones capable of flying continuously without recharging.

However, the nuclear battery's advantages extend beyond longevity and compactness. Unlike conventional chemical batteries, it boasts an energy density over ten times greater than ternary lithium batteries, storing 3,300 milliwatt-hours per gram. It is highly resistant to extreme conditions, operating reliably in temperatures ranging from -60°C to +120°C without self-discharge or risks of fire or explosion. The company claims the cell's environmental impacts are minimal since the radioactive nickel-63 core decays into stable copper over time, eliminating the need for costly recycling processes.

Betavolt's innovation departs from traditional nuclear battery designs that relied on bulky and expensive thermoelectric generators developed during the Cold War era. These older models were limited to aerospace applications due to high internal temperatures and safety concerns. In contrast, Betavolt's betavoltaic technology generates electricity through beta particles emitted during radioactive decay – a safer and more compact alternative.

Betavolt notes that its technology has practically unlimited applications, including use cases in aerospace systems, artificial intelligence devices, medical equipment, small drones, micro-robots, and more. Virtually anything requiring long-lasting power supplies is a potential market.

Zhang Wei, chairman and CEO of Betavolt, noted that the company is currently the only global producer of large diamond semiconductor materials. This capability also has applications in supercapacitors and ultra-long carbon nanotube materials sectors.

The breakthrough has sparked global interest in nuclear battery development. Institutions such as Northwest Normal University in China are exploring similar technologies using rare isotopes like carbon-14. International competitors like City Labs in the U.S., Kronos Advanced Technologies, Yasheng Group, and Arkenlight in the UK are also pushing forward with advancements in betavoltaic technology. City Labs recently received funding from the National Institutes of Health to develop long-lasting betavoltaic batteries for medical devices like pacemakers and artificial hearts. However, these cells use tritium as a radioactive core.

Permalink to story:

 
This may be pretty tough to scale. The demo is 22 microns thick to produce 100 microwatts. No mention of surface area, only thickness.

Meaning that to power a garage door opener or your car's keyfob, it'll need to be around 1-2 cm thick, at scale, since it will also need the surrounding infrastructure to channel all that electricity and interface with a system.
 
THIS is what the smartwatch industry has been waiting for… once this is in an Apple Watch, I can use it for years instead of 2-3 days…
Who cares about Apple's garbage watch? My Garmin smart watch lasts 14-15 days on a charge easily (provided I don't use GPS). I find it amusing that the first application for this battery tech that comes to your mind is some useless Apple gadget. You know there are far more important things that could benefit from this new tech, right?
 
This tech sounds interesting, but I'm not sure how well it will scale to higher capacities. Also, there's zero mention of price, manufacturing cost, or how complicated the process they used to create this battery. I assume it will not be cheap. Let's not get our hopes up prematurely though.
 
Who cares about Apple's garbage watch? My Garmin smart watch lasts 14-15 days on a charge easily (provided I don't use GPS). I find it amusing that the first application for this battery tech that comes to your mind is some useless Apple gadget. You know there are far more important things that could benefit from this new tech, right?
I’ve posted in previous threads that I love the concept of a smartwatch but I wear a watch 24/7 (except for showering) and require a watch battery to last years - not days.

While I said Apple Smartwatch, obviously this would apply to ANY company’s smartwatch…

And while I laud the principle of using it for “important” things - if it isn’t used for something profitable, it won’t survive…
 
Thinking about it, these things are probably less like batteries that discharge as you use them, and more like little nuclear generators that produce the power whether you use them or not. Using the power isn't going to convert that nickel-63 to copper faster. So, could you just use it to charge a capacitor for tasks like that garage door opener if you're only going to use it a couple button-presses per day?
Not that I want a garage door opener with a $500+ battery in it...
 
A phone typically uses 5W but may go up to 15+
For 5W it will need 50 of these ... if the price is ~$500 a piece as someone mentioned in the comments ...
Anyway, great for really small stuff, and when the price drops 100x for bigger stuff as well.

There is no machinery or equipment that lasts 50 years though, except for the American cars in Cuba. They should electrify them.
--
EDIT: I was 1000x wrong, as Puiu pointed out. For 5W you need 50,000 pcs, not 50. This makes this battery more of a curiosity than something with practical implications.
 
Last edited:
A phone typically uses 5W but may go up to 15+
For 5W it will need 50 of these ... if the price is ~$500 a piece as someone mentioned in the comments ...
Anyway, great for really small stuff, and when the price drops 100x for bigger stuff as well.

There is no machinery or equipment that lasts 50 years though, except for the American cars in Cuba. They should electrify them.
At 100 microwatts each, don't you need 50k?

If they actually manage to make a 1W version that is small enough, maybe.
 
Who cares about Apple's garbage watch? My Garmin smart watch lasts 14-15 days on a charge easily (provided I don't use GPS). I find it amusing that the first application for this battery tech that comes to your mind is some useless Apple gadget. You know there are far more important things that could benefit from this new tech, right?

But apparently Apple watches save lives, predicting cardiac arrest or pinging of at Satellite for help etc

They do not when you have sex though , would love for them to send relevant adverts on completion
 
Considering what the date is I am being very skeptical. However I looked it up and found articles from earlier in the year about the same tech.

So something to look forward to when it scales.
 
At 100 microwatts each, don't you need 50k?

If they actually manage to make a 1W version that is small enough, maybe.
Ooops ... yeah. You're of course right, and I was just 3 orders of magnitude wrong :)
Thanks.
 
Imagine the posibilities...
Somebody pisses you off, hack the watch, over load the Nuke reactor on the device, mini boom, vaporise ...James Bond and put that in his pipe and smoke it.
 
More propaganda from the country that has the most advanced brainwashing machine in the world.
*Sigh*
The Betacel that was introduced by an engineer with McDonnell Douglas in 1972 is the very first betavolt battery ever made, and to add insult to injury, that battery produced four times the output power. Four times!
The battery saw commercial use in pacemakers for a while, but sigma surrounding 3-mile Island caused companies to make the move toward lithium ion batteries, which were just as new. As a pacemaker battery, the lithium battery lasted about six years.
Only recently has China resurrected this old tech for this rather low output battery they're bringing to market.

The fact of the matter is it's that China is making a major international propaganda push to advertise their country. This battery is a part of that propaganda. They're will never be a 3V, 1 W version--not for non military applications, that is, unless it is heavily shielded with lead.
You can tell when China is doing real science instead of this old, obsolete stuff when they actually do work that no one has done before. Sadly, China has yet to do such a thing. As with the McDonnell Douglas battery, this one is a direct copy of the tech.
 
What is a great feature is that it decays into stable copper. Whereas delpeted lithium ion stays hazardous.
In the 50 years meantime, you'll have to contend with the real possibility of developing leukemia and other cancerous, malignant diseases.
You dope, these batteries have been out since the 1970's. Only a dummy world believe the propaganda from the country that's trying is hardest to sell itself to the international community...
 
This tech sounds interesting, but I'm not sure how well it will scale to higher capacities. Also, there's zero mention of price, manufacturing cost, or how complicated the process they used to create this battery. I assume it will not be cheap. Let's not get our hopes up prematurely though.

Meh, the Chinese would likely subsidize the hell out of it to make it competitive on price.
 
Back