Columbus judge sues researcher for disclosing true impact of ransomware attack

[Endymio]

3. "17 intelligence agencies agree that Russia meddled in the election" - officially it's 8

No, officially it's FOUR, meaning 17 is a wild overstatement. Yet even today -- nearly a full decade later, you can still find this disinformation on Facebook and other platforms.

4. "Trump told people to drink bleach" - people DID drink bleach and things like Lysol. instead of "bleach", trump said actually "disinfectant" and not to just drink it, but to inject it.

Thanks for admitting the "drink bleach" was yet another outright lie allowed to circulate for years on social media. But Trump told no one to "inject disinfectant" either -- as I suspect even you know. Trump, in speaking to a medical researcher, was clearly stating that means for disinfecting blood would be an "interesting" avenue to check. And guess what? Medical researchers are doing exactly what he suggested today, with research into UV-based blood sterilization.

5. "Trump called white supremacists 'very fine people'" - in the context of what was happening, it's not hard to see why.

Doubling down on this disinformation? Even the far-Left site Snopes has now officially retracted the claim and labeled it false. Trump stated there were "very fine people" on both sides of the debate about removing historical statues ... and seconds later, in the very same speech, specifically, loudly, and repeatedly condemned white supremacy.

6. "Trump's wife worked as an escort" - the Daily Mail paid dearly for that tabloid article. so did others.

So why was this claim allowed to circulate on social media sites for years? And why are you not calling for the same actions against those platform CEOs as you are against Musk?

 

[Endymio]

7. "Trump was secretly given the DNC documents stolen by Wikileaks" - we don't know if it is true or not....

Oops! We do know this was disinformation. No doubt whatsoever. The original claim was that Wikileaks provided these stolen documents to Trump before their general release.

NYT: Dec. 8, 2017: "CNN on Friday corrected an erroneous report that Donald Trump Jr. had received advance notice from the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks about a trove of hacked documents that it planned to release during last year’s presidential campaign...."

Again: why were disinformation posts containing this false claim allowed to circulate for years on social media sites? And why are you not calling for action against the CEOs that allowed it?

 

[Puiu]

Oops! We do know this was disinformation. No doubt whatsoever. The original claim was that Wikileaks provided these stolen documents to Trump before their general release.

NYT: Dec. 8, 2017: "CNN on Friday corrected an erroneous report that Donald Trump Jr. had received advance notice from the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks about a trove of hacked documents that it planned to release during last year’s presidential campaign...."

Again: why were disinformation posts containing this false claim allowed to circulate for years on social media sites? And why are you not calling for action against the CEOs that allowed it?

"The Washington Post revealed that CNN had got the date of the e-mail to Donald, Jr., wrong. Numerous outlets queried Ross’s Flynn story before it was corrected."

you are making very specific statements and leaving out the details.
you still haven't copy-pasted the emails I asked you to.

 

[Puiu]

No, it's absurd speculation.

LOL, what? Musk didn't make the tweet in question. He LIKED a tweet made by someone else. If you can't get even that part of the story straight, it's best if you don't attempt to discuss it at all.


Again, predicting the consequences of governmental policies is not "inflammatory" or incitement to violence. You yourself -- and countless others -- have predicted everything from war to the end of democracy itself if Trump is elected. Are you inciting violence with those posts? A simple yes or no will do.

And in any case, Musk's predictions from 2023 seem very clearly to be coming true, which makes them accurate and prescient as well.


You have been reported for disinformation. Retract this nonsense.

"LOL, what? Musk didn't make the tweet in question. " - he retweeted it, not just liked.

"predicting the consequences of governmental policies is not "inflammatory" or incitement to violence." - it is when you support the violent protests and write anti-immigration propaganda WHILE these immigrants were being subjected to violence.

"Musk's predictions from 2023 seem very clearly to be coming true"- and yet I see no civil war. the anti-racism peaceful protests managed to calm things down. Musk's wish for more violence failed.