Crytek finally explains why the jump from Far Cry to Crysis changed everything

[Cal Jeffrey]

In context: Crytek recently turned 25, and its new documentary revisits the origins of the legendary "But can it run Crysis?" meme. The studio reveals the game's staying power wasn't just brute tech – it came from a bold shift to mimicking real nature, setting a new bar for realism.

Crytek is marking its 25th anniversary with a new documentary series that reexamines its legacy – starting with the creative leap between Far Cry and Crysis. For years, gamers assumed Crysis was simply the product of raw technical muscle, the benchmark that melted PCs. However, the German studio's artists say the real breakthrough lay in a fundamental shift in philosophy: Far Cry's jungle sprang from imagination, while Crysis strove to replicate nature as faithfully as possible.

The documentary's debut episode (below) revisits Crytek's early history, from the dinosaur-packed X-Isle tech demo to the unexpected success of Far Cry in 2004. That first game delivered a lush island setting, which art director Marcel Schaika explains the team built almost entirely "out of their heads," drawing on reference images but not beholden to exact realism. It looked good because it was bold, not because it was true to life.

By the time the studio moved on to Crysis, the approach shifted. According to PC Gamer, Crytek dispatched artists to an island rainforest in Haiti to study and record real jungles, gather data on foliage density, and obsess over the way water refracted sunlight. The goal was to build environments with unprecedented realism.

"The biggest difference between Far Cry [and Crysis is that] in Far Cry, the art department created a natural environment as they imagined it," Schaika says in the documentary. "In Crysis, we mimicked nature as closely as possible. I think that made a massive difference."

Rather than treating environments as static backdrops, Crytek artists designed them to function as living characters within the game, reacting to the player's actions. If you threw a grenade into a building, it would collapse. If you fired your gun enough at the same spot on a tree trunk, it would fall over. This pivot had lasting consequences.

Far Cry's world was convincing in a stylized way, but the dedication to empirical detail in Crysis made it a touchstone for photorealism and helped the game's visuals endure. Even eighteen years later, Crysis remains astonishing not only because it pushed hardware, but because its art direction aimed to mirror the natural world rather than invent one.

The documentary comes at a controversial time. Crytek recently paused work on Crysis 4 after the studio laid off 15 percent of its staff, leaving the future of the sequel in limbo after three years in development. Future episodes promise more behind-the-scenes insight, but the first already reframes a famous story: Crysis wasn't just "the game that could melt your rig" – it was a deliberate attempt to make digital nature indistinguishable from the real thing.

Permalink to story:

Crytek finally explains why the jump from Far Cry to Crysis changed everything

 

[Thatsdisgusting]

The irony is... my PC still can't run Crysis.
But now because of msvcr80.dll, lol

 

[Megalomaniac]

Yerli wants to believe Crysis is a huge difference from Far Cry.
It's really not.
The shift from You-v-North Koreans to You-v-Space aliens comes at roughly the same time as Far Cry's shift from You-v-mercs to You-v-mutants.
They are basically retelling the story of The Island of Dr. Moreau.
To some extent, even Halo did the exact same thing with the shift from You-v-aliens to You-v-The Flood (Mutants).

The technological improvements made it look better, but they basically did the exact same thing. The nanosuit is not radically different from the mutant powers you get in Far Cry Instincts.

Frankly, I think they should have kept the game as You-v-North Koreans. It was straight forward, simple and coherent.

Once they pulled the alien plot in, the whole series withered on the vine and died.

A lot of mistakes were also made with marketing. Why o why did they release Crysis 2 on the consoles before Crysis 1? The player who picks up Crysis 2 has no idea what they're doing beyond playing a less-good version of Call of Duty in a universe they don't know the story of until they play the initial game.

Playing Crysis after Crysis 2 will immediately make you realize that they actually took a step backwards. Linearity to open-world sandbox.

Crysis 3 was an improvement on gameplay, but the story went off the rails and by then many people gave upon it.

 

[noel24]

Yerli wants to believe Crysis is a huge difference from Far Cry.
It's really not.
The shift from You-v-North Koreans to You-v-Space aliens comes at roughly the same time as Far Cry's shift from You-v-mercs to You-v-mutants.
They are basically retelling the story of The Island of Dr. Moreau.
To some extent, even Halo did the exact same thing with the shift from You-v-aliens to You-v-The Flood (Mutants).

The technological improvements made it look better, but they basically did the exact same thing. The nanosuit is not radically different from the mutant powers you get in Far Cry Instincts.

Frankly, I think they should have kept the game as You-v-North Koreans. It was straight forward, simple and coherent.

Once they pulled the alien plot in, the whole series withered on the vine and died.

A lot of mistakes were also made with marketing. Why o why did they release Crysis 2 on the consoles before Crysis 1? The player who picks up Crysis 2 has no idea what they're doing beyond playing a less-good version of Call of Duty in a universe they don't know the story of until they play the initial game.

Playing Crysis after Crysis 2 will immediately make you realize that they actually took a step backwards. Linearity to open-world sandbox.

Crysis 3 was an improvement on gameplay, but the story went off the rails and by then many people gave upon it.

Let's be serious. It was never North Korea. It was always People's Republic of China, but without controversy in the biggest market in the World.

 

[Subset6]

Just love the Crysis theme song. Still listen sometimes, and the “MAXIMUM ARMOR!, MAXIMUM STRENGTH!” Sad about Crysis 4, hope they sort it.

 

[broly]

Crysis set the bar for terrible optimization that is the standard in the gaming industry today.

 

[Megalomaniac]

Let's be serious. It was never North Korea. It was always People's Republic of China, but without controversy in the biggest market in the World.

No - it was North Korea. We've had games where China was the protagonist. This game was early enough that they could have put in China but they specifically wanted North Korea. Maybe it was to claim we are far enough in the future where North Korea is a moderate threat.

 

[Theinsanegamer]

No - it was North Korea. We've had games where China was the protagonist. This game was early enough that they could have put in China but they specifically wanted North Korea. Maybe it was to claim we are far enough in the future where North Korea is a moderate threat.

Protagonist, sure, but Noel is talking about China being the Antagonist. That to my knowledge is still taboo ground and was in 2007 as well.

 

[arrowflash]

Yerli wants to believe Crysis is a huge difference from Far Cry.
It's really not.
The shift from You-v-North Koreans to You-v-Space aliens comes at roughly the same time as Far Cry's shift from You-v-mercs to You-v-mutants.
They are basically retelling the story of The Island of Dr. Moreau.
To some extent, even Halo did the exact same thing with the shift from You-v-aliens to You-v-The Flood (Mutants).

The technological improvements made it look better, but they basically did the exact same thing. The nanosuit is not radically different from the mutant powers you get in Far Cry Instincts.

Frankly, I think they should have kept the game as You-v-North Koreans. It was straight forward, simple and coherent.

Once they pulled the alien plot in, the whole series withered on the vine and died.

For me, the shift from Norks to aliens in Crysis was pretty interesting, engaging plot-wise, and fun. I might be in the minority but I liked it.

On the other hand, I've always hated the shift from mercs to mutants in Far Cry. It should've been only mercs to the end.

Maybe it could've been handled better if the mutants weren't all such bullet / damage sponges, and if there were lots of mixed areas with both mercs and mutants, with infighting between the two factions that you could take advantage of to sneak through. If my memory isn't failing me there were some areas like that but too few.

 

[Megalomaniac]

Crysis set the bar for terrible optimization that is the standard in the gaming industry today.

Crysis relied on an expensive CPU with 2 cores processing very fast rather than the power of a GPU. The game was ahead of its time. Once Quad core CPU became the norm and Quad Core gaming became the norm, the average game started to look more and more like Crysis.

Building a game very few people can play isn't good for business. Now these games are optimized for consoles which ensures they can be played on low-end PC.

 

[kinetix]

The irony is... my PC still can't run Crysis.
But now because of msvcr80.dll, lol

just install MS VC++ redist 2008 and 2010

 

[airbornex]

Turns out Crysis didn’t just fry your GPU for the fun of it. It was your PC gasping under the weight of meticulously simulated Haitian foliage and scientifically accurate jungle humidity.

Love how the meme was always about brute force, but behind the scenes it was really a bunch of German devs obsessing over how light bends through jungle mist.