Discord bans servers and accounts linked to alt-right

Well, Trump was criticized when he condemned the actions of the white supremacists, simply because he didn't allow the far left to write the speech for him. Anything Trump might say or do, will never coincide with the wishes of Hillary's, "he's not our president, so he can't ever do anything right", pissy, dissident, bitter, fanatical, social entitlement grubbing followers.

Hardly, when I tell you about the 'group' I live with's penchant for illegal doings and depravity, you accuse me of being a "racist".

Although, I do think there's an equation of sorts whereby, "the intelligence of the mob is equal to the square root of the IQ of the group's least intelligent member", which cuts a wide swath, both to the right and left, of center.

You seem to hear what you want to hear, Trump didn't mention the names of the groups he denounced, so according to you, he 'glorified them'.

And BTW, I'm doing social experiments each and every time I post here. You don't think I give a flying snot about Ryzen, or the newest smart phone, do ya? If you do, you're delusional.

No one cares about hillary. Stop bringing her up as a scapegoat.

"You seem to hear what you want to hear,"

That's awfully funny.

"Hardly, when I tell you about the 'group' I live with's penchant for illegal doings and depravity, you accuse me of being a "racist"."

No, you are taking select experience against specific minorities and bending them to fit your narrative. Note, you are the only one who called yourself "racist". Perhaps an assumption, perhaps self reflection. You tell me.

"And BTW, I'm doing social experiments each and every time I post here. You don't think I give a flying snot about Ryzen, or the newest smart phone, do ya? If you do, you're delusional."

That's funny, because that's basically admitting that all your comments are just made up hogwash to elicit certain responses. That's one way to hand me the argument.
 
No one cares about hillary. Stop bringing her up as a scapegoat.
Hillary cares about Hillary, and that's one person too many.
In fact, a few weeks back, she was on the news running her mouth about how, "if the Russians hadn't interfered with the election, I'd be your president" < Unquote of a direct, verbatim quote.

"You seem to hear what you want to hear,"

That's awfully funny.
Is it?

"Hardly, when I tell you about the 'group' I live with's penchant for illegal doings and depravity, you accuse me of being a "racist"."
My bad, that was wiyosaya who had me in a "white fog". I would interpret that as "racist". Of course you likely wouldn't, because it would be, "inconvenient".

No, you are taking select experience against specific minorities and bending them to fit your narrative. Note, you are the only one who called yourself "racist". Perhaps an assumption, perhaps self reflection. You tell me.
Until you come over and actually experience the inner city, and realize that my conditions are far from unique, I'd say you flat out don't know squat about the inner city, and you should probably shut your yap about things you know absolutely nothing about.

What I'm saying is this, there certainly are a ton of black people who have achieved more than myself. However, there are more worthless people riding on the coattails of the labors, than you can even imagine.

The story runs like the, suburban police stop and search a black person, who happens to be a police Sargent in an adjacent town. He screams, (perhaps justifiably, he's been "profiled". Now we have a test case. All of a sudden, the police aren't allowed "stop and frisk", and hundreds of people carrying drugs, illegal weapons, and what have you, are suddenly immunized from stop and frisk. The criminals score a huge win, and the police are themselves, handcuffed from doing their jobs.

"And BTW, I'm doing social experiments each and every time I post here. You don't think I give a flying snot about Ryzen, or the newest smart phone, do ya? If you do, you're delusional."

That's funny, because that's basically admitting that all your comments are just made up hogwash to elicit certain responses. That's one way to hand me the argument.
And you take the bait each and every time I do it. Now who's the fool?

I especially like the part how you summarily declare yourself the "winner". That takes hubris, along with a massive ego, and a lack of intellect.

BTW, you seem to enjoy point by point addressing my posts. Oddly though, you seem to pick and choose only the points you want to address, ignoring many of the principal and most important issues..

"I win" < See how crass that is when I do it? :p
 
Last edited:
I am living proof that banning/ blocking people on the internet doesn't work.

Facebook couldn't contain me.

The gates of Twitter Hell couldn't hold me.
 
I am not white and probably don't understand the politics, but this remind me of when baker won't make cake for gay marriage because they don't find it morally acceptable to their believes.
 
I am not white and probably don't understand the politics, but this remind me of when baker won't make cake for gay marriage because they don't find it morally acceptable to their believes.
No, they'll make the cake, you just can't have a statue of a Southern Civil War hero on it.
 
Last edited:
"A larger issue still looms over what actually defines "extremist ideology".
Let me help you to define "extremist ideology". When someone uses swastikas, calls people to attack anyone who is "jewish, communist, leftist, black" because they are the "enemies" and their blood is "superior" this is extremist ideology!
When someone uses Hitler as an icon and his ideas as the best to follow blindly, when you use your skin color as an example of "perfection" that's extremist and ultimately stupid at the same time and must be fought.
Moreover, I don't see how the enemies of the KKK racist mafia should be labeled as evil people, like the enemies of the Nazis were evil because they wanted to win the war against racism all over the world.
 
"A larger issue still looms over what actually defines "extremist ideology".
Let me help you to define "extremist ideology". When someone uses swastikas, calls people to attack anyone who is "jewish, communist, leftist, black" because they are the "enemies" and their blood is "superior" this is extremist ideology!
When someone uses Hitler as an icon and his ideas as the best to follow blindly, when you use your skin color as an example of "perfection" that's extremist and ultimately stupid at the same time and must be fought.
Moreover, I don't see how the enemies of the KKK racist mafia should be labeled as evil people, like the enemies of the Nazis were evil because they wanted to win the war against racism all over the world.
If you understood the difference between a declared war, and a rally, you'd be quite the philosopher!

The First Amendment states that people can say what they want, believe in what they want, and worship who they choose. You apparently haven't gotten that memo.

Besides, "extremist ideology", has quite a variable definition. For example, under the U.S.S.R.'s rule, I believe worshiping Christ was illegal. So, we should have sent you, and our atl-left over the Moscow, to straighten those damned heathen Communist party leaders out..
 
Last edited:
You make less and less sense as you go on. Now we have a Muslim cop shooting an unarmed white woman. Is somebody getting even?

As for protesting that action I think the New Zealand Prime Minister protested that. AFAIK, he wasn't arrested for it.
Ah cranky. So what are you angry about today?
 
Ah cranky. So what are you angry about today?
"Pick a card, any card"....;)

If I had to narrow it down to just a few things, (in no particular order), I'd say, Windows 10, overpopulation, Pit Bulls, the fact we've cut down pretty much all of our forests, and last but certainly not least, parasites like Elon Musk.

Hey, you asked....And now you've got me started! :mad:

I'm mad about scenarios like this: (From a previous post):

The story runs like this; suburban police stop and search a black person, who happens to be a police Sargent in an adjacent town. He screams, (perhaps justifiably, he's been "profiled"). Now we have a test case. All of a sudden, the police aren't allowed "stop and frisk", and hundreds, perhaps thousands of people carrying drugs, illegal weapons, and what have you, are suddenly immunized from stop and frisk. The criminals score a huge win, and the police are then themselves, handcuffed from doing their jobs.

The lowest, most useless and dangerous members of our society are getting away, en masse, with coat-tailing he accomplishments of honorable people who are trying, and succeeding, to meld their lives with the existing framework of our society.

A few days ago, I heard on the news that the "black lives matter" dogma, was influenced, or at least massively inflamed, by Russian operatives.

I expect most people would simply dismiss this as "crazy talk". But in reality, these are the very same tactics our CIA has been using for years, all around the globe. You don't like a particular regime? Sow the seeds of political unrest to try and change it to one more favorable to America's 'needs'.

I figure at least part of the Trump /Russians scandal, might have some basis in fact. But the wild, inflated response to it, is generated by the guilty consciences of our leaders, and intelligence community. It their instance, it's a case of, "it takes on, to know one".

I can picture the NSA secretly inflaming the alt-left, to cause those recent events.

But what scares me the most, is the naivete', and regurgitated platitudes of the general public, allowing, even desiring, history to be rewritten to suit certain factions agenda.

So a black person sees a confederate flag, this makes them 'uncomfortable'. Their unease forces a national discussion about it. Well hell, if a white person should ride through the bowels of Harlem, their discomfort will just cause them to roll up the car windows, and lock the doors. After which they'll likely move on, both physically and emotionally, end of story.
 
Last edited:
Back