Evernessince
Posts: 5,469 +6,160
Well, Trump was criticized when he condemned the actions of the white supremacists, simply because he didn't allow the far left to write the speech for him. Anything Trump might say or do, will never coincide with the wishes of Hillary's, "he's not our president, so he can't ever do anything right", pissy, dissident, bitter, fanatical, social entitlement grubbing followers.
Hardly, when I tell you about the 'group' I live with's penchant for illegal doings and depravity, you accuse me of being a "racist".
Although, I do think there's an equation of sorts whereby, "the intelligence of the mob is equal to the square root of the IQ of the group's least intelligent member", which cuts a wide swath, both to the right and left, of center.
You seem to hear what you want to hear, Trump didn't mention the names of the groups he denounced, so according to you, he 'glorified them'.
And BTW, I'm doing social experiments each and every time I post here. You don't think I give a flying snot about Ryzen, or the newest smart phone, do ya? If you do, you're delusional.
No one cares about hillary. Stop bringing her up as a scapegoat.
"You seem to hear what you want to hear,"
That's awfully funny.
"Hardly, when I tell you about the 'group' I live with's penchant for illegal doings and depravity, you accuse me of being a "racist"."
No, you are taking select experience against specific minorities and bending them to fit your narrative. Note, you are the only one who called yourself "racist". Perhaps an assumption, perhaps self reflection. You tell me.
"And BTW, I'm doing social experiments each and every time I post here. You don't think I give a flying snot about Ryzen, or the newest smart phone, do ya? If you do, you're delusional."
That's funny, because that's basically admitting that all your comments are just made up hogwash to elicit certain responses. That's one way to hand me the argument.