Driving toward zero: how the DOT plans to use V2X wireless communication to eliminate traffic fatalities

Stozzy

Posts: 13   +1
In brief: According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Association (NHTSA), there were 40,000 traffic-related fatalities last year. The U.S. Department of Transportation hopes to reduce that statistic to zero with a comprehensive technology framework called V2X, an ambitious plan that addresses improving infrastructure, vehicle technology, and regulation to make our road trips as safe as possible.

Automakers and regulatory agencies have been implementing safety features for decades, including Blind Spot Detection and Lane Departure Warning, which use flashing lights and audible chimes to alert the driver. There's also the Automatic Emergency Braking system that utilizes cameras and computer analysis to detect a potential collision and automatically apply brakes if the driver does not react fast enough. Adaptive Cruise Control systems like Chevrolet's Super Cruise, meanwhile, allow the vehicle to maintain speed, distance, and passing hands-free, but driver attention is mandatory.

The adoption of these safety features is slow and fragmented, as each automaker varies which ones they offer based on the vehicle trims. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has released its plan to address this issue while aiming to reduce traffic deaths to zero: the national deployment of Vehicle-to-everything (V2X).

V2X uses wireless communication technology (5.895 - 5.925 GHz) for vehicles to exchange information directly with each other or with data centers to enhance driving safety. It sounds like quorum sensing, the cell-to-cell communication process bacteria use to detect and respond to environmental and population changes.

Interoperability is another part of the V2X vision, as it will standardize data communication and security across the entire technology stack.

The V2X plan has several vital areas:

  • Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) shares information such as position and speed between vehicles to prevent collisions.
  • Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) allows the interpretation of traffic signals and road signs to improve traffic flow.
  • Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P) will alert pedestrians and cyclists about potential dangers.
  • Vehicle-to-Network (V2N) allows vehicles to connect to data centers and cellular networks for real-time updates on traffic and road conditions.

V2X is part of the National Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Reference Architecture, a framework for planning, defining, and integrating technology into transportation systems. This framework keeps V2X adaptable as newer technologies become available.

The fact that the DOT is committed to cybersecurity with V2X is good news, especially with the revelation this year that GM is selling driver data. V2X is secure by design; a Security Credential Management System (SCMS) will authenticate and digitally sign messages to establish trust among its certified components. And even though automakers will have access to some of the data, the focus on protecting Personal Identifiable Information (PII) for its intended purpose should mitigate inappropriate use.

The DOT has laid out a plan to implement V2X across the four main areas: infrastructure deployments, vehicles, spectrum and interoperability, benefits, and technical assistance. The goals are in phases: short-term, between 2024-2028; medium-term, between 2029-2031; and long-term (significant adoption), between 2032-2036. Automakers are not required to adopt V2X, but the DOT hopes its layered approach of standardization, technical assistance, regulatory support, and seed funding will encourage rapid adoption.

Permalink to story:

 
While their intentions are good the fact that individual's are driving means it will be all but impossible to completely eliminate accidents or fatalities. BUT, anything that reduces the same will be a great benefit and welcome ....
 
There needs to be MUCH more privacy built into anything the government and the automotive industry try to implement. The left wants to yell at corporations and the right wants to yell at the government. But with the "revolving doors" that run the show, they have both been negligent in consumer privacy.

Demand better user data controls. And don't buy a vehicle that actively spies on you. Safety features can be great, but the automotive data sector is the worst in the Free World at data privacy. And that is saying a lot.

Keep fighting!
 
Last edited:
I wonder how long it will be before they try to use this system to monitor your speed and administer traffic fines.
I remember one of the insurance companies offering discounts if you install a device that monitors your driving habits and drive carefully. I think it measures accelerations and sharp turns. As much as I needed money that time, I did not do it.
 
I wonder how long it will be before they try to use this system to monitor your speed and administer traffic fines.


Well, it's been shown that auto mfg. have been sharing driver data with INSURANCE companies, so why not.
If they were to get everyone off gas and onto EV's (which I pray never happens), what will replace the FUEL TAX? Oh, they will use the GPS data to tax you by the mile.
 
They seem to think that technology will be the answer to every problem.
Sorry, all it does is make us easier to control and squeeze more money out of us.
 
I'll also tell you a secret: They know this won't stop fatalities anymore than compromised encryption saving the children.
A purported tech enthusiast who fails to understand how clearly this will dramatically reduce auto fatalities? Say it ain't so!

I wonder how long it will be before they try to use this system to monitor your speed and administer traffic fines.
While the Libertartian side of me has the same kneejerk reaction as you -- if one accepts that the government has the moral and legal right to set traffic laws and punish those who break them, then this naturally follows, does it not?
 
A purported tech enthusiast who fails to understand how clearly this will dramatically reduce auto fatalities? Say it ain't so!

While the Libertartian side of me has the same kneejerk reaction as you -- if one accepts that the government has the moral and legal right to set traffic laws and punish those who break them, then this naturally follows, does it not?
A tech enthusiast who fails to understand how clearly this will dramatically reduce your freedom of movement and be used to control you? Say it aint so!

The government has the right to set traffic laws, but that does not mean they have the right to invade your privacy and control everything you do. This is not soviet russia. One of the founding principles of America was the limiting of government power.
 
A tech enthusiast who fails to understand how clearly this will dramatically reduce your freedom of movement and be used to control you?
It'll be used to reduce your ability to break speed limits without penalty, sure. If you want to hypothesize the government building in secret backdoors to prevent you from driving to certain areas or during certain periods, it's a possibility -- but that's a rather different argument.

The government has the right to set traffic laws, but that does not mean they have the right to invade your privacy
There is no "private right" to hide at what speed you're traveling on a public highway. If you think so, explain that to the next cop you see with a radar gun.

Personally, I'd rather not see half our police forces doing nothing but radar-gunning speeders, rather than out catching murderers, rapists, and potential terrorists.

This is not soviet russia. One of the founding principles of America was the limiting of government power.
There are literally thousands of federal laws and actions that exceed and even violate the US Constitution. Yet nowhere in that document does it imply you have a right to traverse public roads without a vehicle that continually ensures you're traveling at a safe speed.
 
They seem to think that technology will be the answer to every problem.
Sorry, all it does is make us easier to control and squeeze more money out of us.
It is perfect for the government. Speak about solving problems, while getting more money to feed ever expanding staff.
 
Back