That is what I implied, yes?China is starting to make their own chips now with chip ban to China. The US and west are now coming to hard truth that offshoring to cheap country can hurt them selfs if such country has dictator.
That is what I implied, yes?China is starting to make their own chips now with chip ban to China. The US and west are now coming to hard truth that offshoring to cheap country can hurt them selfs if such country has dictator.
And they are the same people that wasn't supplying Russia with anything in the first place. What are they going to sanction, the Sun?More than two-thirds of the world's population hasn't sanctioned Russia -- you realize that, right?
Lets bookmark this topic and come back to it at the end of the year. Russian exports are about to be nearly abandoned. And no, they are not exporting well, although the finances behind it aren't doing badly because of price increases.:Russia's economy is based almost solely on oil, natural gas, and metals -- and they're selling record amounts of all three at present
You tell me. After all, it was right to far-right leaning politicians that made the call to go in even if their reasons were utter BS.Was it worth killing 200,000 (three times that if you believe the Lancet figures) innocent civilians to get rid of him?
And when did that happen? Or is that some made-up story for which we only have your word? Its a different story from what is told here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_and_weapons_of_mass_destructionWell, let's see. Iraq never openly threatened to acquire nuclear weapons and attack the US directly, as Ukraine did.
Is that you saying, Just take my word for it, because I vetted it?Iraq never cut off the water supply to hundreds of thousands of US citizens, as Ukraine did.
Hussein was no angel, or do you call using Mustard Gas and other chemical agents on Ethnic Kurds "being kind to them?" https://www.thoughtco.com/top-crimes-of-saddam-hussein-1779933Iraq may have given a little to Hamas, but it never funded terror groups organized solely to kill Americans like Ukraine did ethnic Russians.
I feel you either underestimated or looking the wrong way. When Russia invaded Ukraine, did the western power do anything other than, (1) giving them monetary aid (which I believe are mostly like a loan than “giving”) that does not really help during war, and, (2) sending them weapons (again, sending them but I believe Ukraine had to pay for them) and some aid? They slapped sanctions left right and center on Russia, but its been more than 100 days since the invasion started. Is it effective in a sense its forced Russia to stand down? In the end, the common people everywhere in the world suffers from the consequences of the war, and further aggravation of the situation due to the sanctions. So who benefits? Isn’t it the rich people that owns business that can now charge you significantly more due to the “shortage”? Is it not the nations that are “sending them weapons” and “lending them money”? In fact, if Russia is shrugging off the sanctions and boycott from the western nations, it just proved how ineffective these measures are, and as a result, make it more attractive for China to follow. Don’t get me wrong, sanctions hurt, but clearly it hurts both the nation that is sanction while also having a global impact due to interdependencies. And if you observe such a big ripple effect the sanctions on Russia is, you can imagine its going to be significantly worst when they sanction China. I am not defending China, but the current sanctions on Russia is prove that its going to hurt the common people badly.After Ukraine war and seeing how Russia fared in it and how the Russian image got dented across globe, chances of China attacking Taiwan are at best, slim.
Russia's image is only dented in the west.
The rest of the world is taking note of USA's bullying tactics AND the fact that Russia hasn't really been hurt by them. (Don't believe me? Google how the ruble is doing)
So powers like China are taking note of the possibility of standing up to the bully and walking away the winner.
there will be no war, only invasion...If China is looking for a war it can't win, they'll get one if they invade Taiwan.
That statement makes about as much sense as beer tap on a water-balloon. If China even attempts to invade Taiwan, the US Navy will explain to them the folly of their mindless notion. Just because China doesn't "recognize" the sovereignty of Taiwan doesn't change their sovereignty claim. They are one of the strongest economic partners of many of the nations of the west. They will be strongly defended. Mentioning the Ukraine only shows an ignorance to the particulars of each situation, which are NOT comparable.there will be no war, only invasion...
no country declares war on China "only" for Taiwan
look at Ukraine
Russia is only suffering if you read the pro US press that seems to bring fake news to the front and ignore the real pounding that Ukraine is taking. The Russians are doing very well in achieving their goals to ruin Ukraine and Zelensky is a great actor, US believes him thoroughly....After Ukraine war and seeing how Russia fared in it and how the Russian image got dented across globe, chances of China attacking Taiwan are at best, slim.
Nearly all those 'atrocities' were Ukrainian MoD propaganda. Shall we examine a few of their older claims? Raise your hand if you believe any of these ...Bog off Russian troll or sympathiser. You do realise that in an obtuse way you are justifying atrocities happening in Ukraine committed by Russia?
You are just puppeting Putin's psychosis in believing that some neighbor of Russia was going to attack Russia... So they had to invade. Lol...I feel you either underestimated or looking the wrong way. When Russia invaded Ukraine, did the western power do anything other than, (1) giving them monetary aid (which I believe are mostly like a loan than “giving”) that does not really help during war, and, (2) sending them weapons (again, sending them but I believe Ukraine had to pay for them) and some aid? They slapped sanctions left right and center on Russia, but its been more than 100 days since the invasion started. Is it effective in a sense its forced Russia to stand down? In the end, the common people everywhere in the world suffers from the consequences of the war, and further aggravation of the situation due to the sanctions. So who benefits? Isn’t it the rich people that owns business that can now charge you significantly more due to the “shortage”? Is it not the nations that are “sending them weapons” and “lending them money”? In fact, if Russia is shrugging off the sanctions and boycott from the western nations, it just proved how ineffective these measures are, and as a result, make it more attractive for China to follow. Don’t get me wrong, sanctions hurt, but clearly it hurts both the nation that is sanction while also having a global impact due to interdependencies. And if you observe such a big ripple effect the sanctions on Russia is, you can imagine its going to be significantly worst when they sanction China. I am not defending China, but the current sanctions on Russia is prove that its going to hurt the common people badly.
In my opinion, US is not helping with the situation by continuously pouring oil on the fire. Taiwan may think that US is their hero to stand up for them. But these hopes of “protection” is not free. And I feel whatever US is “helping” Taiwan with, I.e. sending forces to Taiwan, selling arms to Taiwan, doing everything contrary to what China warns, is not exactly helping. Why do I say that? Just look back and observe what US is doing in Ukraine now. Russia says no, US will help Ukraine to do exactly the opposite of what Russia warned about, and this I believe should be going on for some time. People may think this is fine, but imagine someone is trying to get close to your partner. You tell him/her to stay away, but instead of complying, they double down on their actions, send gifts, etc, so what would humans naturally do/ feel? If anything, the Russia invasion and US’ provocative actions have basically made the Taiwan invasion more likely.
Make up your mind. You gave Iraq as an example of a war high on the scale of "right things to do". Now it's suddenly a unjustified war of aggression by "right-leaning US politicians? Which is it?You tell me. After all, it was right to far-right leaning politicians that made the call to go in [to Iraq]
Ukraine's statements about reacquire nuclear weapons were made by Zelensky and other members of his government on several occasions, as were Zelensky's statements about withdrawing from the previously agreed-upon Minsk Accords, granting autonomy to Donbas. And their plans to attack Russia directly were codified into Ukraine's official defense strategy document in March of '21. All of this is easily verified -- especially if you read European press regularly:And when did that happen? ...Is that you saying, Just take my word for it?
I think we all know you are spreading propaganda because Russia has lost 200+ tanks, 3 Generals and many have stepped down/removed because they do Not believe Putin's narrative.Nearly all those 'atrocities' were Ukrainian MoD propaganda. Shall we examine a few of their older claims? Raise your hand if you believe any of these ...
* "We killed 400 assassins sent after Zelensky -- but don't have one single body or photograph as evidence"
*" Our defenders of Snake Island fought and died to the last man -- except they all surrendered."
* "Russia's planning to blow up a nuclear reactor and irradiate all Europe -- at a location that ensures Russia and Belarus would receive the majority of the fallout."
* "Russia poisoned our delegates to the peace talks -- but they were too busy to seek medical attention or even to have a simple blood test."
* "Russia intentionally bombed civilians at a train station in Donetsk -- the one area in all Ukraine filled with ethnic Russians, fighting for a decade to free themselves from Ukrainian control."
* "Russia intentionally bombed an 'active maternity hospital' -- without furniture or medical equipment, and one in which its lightly-wounded 'victims' waited until western reporters with cameras arrived to walk out of the rubble."
There are countless others -- some true, but most which don't pass the sniff test from anyone who bothers to engage their brain even minimally. My personal favorite was the photo spread of the ex-Miss Ukraine now fighting to free her homeland -- in revealing clothes and holding an airgun.
Except that the list of sovereign nations NATO has attacked is quite lengthy: Serbia, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, etc. All with "good reason" ... at least according to NATO, right?Putin's Russia has been the aggressor for 40 years and His irrational fear of NATO attacking, is why Russia will never join EU.