I would agree for the most part, in the same way that electrocution is infinitely better than drowning.Apple is infinitely more trustworthy than Facebook for privacy.
The result is the same.
I would agree for the most part, in the same way that electrocution is infinitely better than drowning.Apple is infinitely more trustworthy than Facebook for privacy.
It's not even close. The number of times Facebook has changed defaults for security policy to put user data in public domain then gone "whoopsie we didn't mean that" Narrator: they did....I would agree for the most part, in the same way that electrocution is infinitely better than drowning.
The result is the same.
I hold an ineffable level of contempt for Facebook, but I still must ask: exactly what law do you believe this violates? Or are you merely using the word "criminal" as a synonym for behavior with which you disagree?[Facebook] are absolutely deliberately criminal. From the foundation of their business - remember Zuck started a site like hot or not because he was turned down, they developed a social media platform based on addicting users for ad revenue.
No one wakes up one morning to find their Android magically transformed into an iPhone. Using Apple products is a choice. If you don't like their rules, don't use their products. Simple.
For you? I might suggest: Nullius nisi insipientis in errore perseverare.Any further words of wisdom, Captain Obvious?