Family sues Google after man dies driving off collapsed bridge following Maps directions

midian182

Posts: 9,745   +121
Staff member
In brief: Google is being sued by the family of a North Carolina man who drove his car off a collapsed bridge as he followed directions given by Google Maps. It's claimed that Google acted negligently, as it was allegedly informed that the bridge was no longer in use on several occasions, but failed to update its system.

Philip Paxson, a 47-year-old medical device salesman and father of two, drove his pickup truck off the edge of a bridge that had collapsed almost a decade earlier on the outskirts of Hickory, a city about 60 miles northwest of Charlotte, on September 30, 2022. His mother-in-law wrote on a Facebook page that he was returning home from his daughter's ninth birthday, adding that there were no warning signs on the bridge or the road leading up to it.

Paxson's lawyer, Bob Zimmerman, said that he had only recently moved to the area and was unfamiliar with the local roads, relying on Google Maps. It's claimed that the navigation system directed Paxson to cross the collapsed bridge. "Tragically, as he drove cautiously in the darkness and rain, he unsuspectingly followed Google's outdated directions to what his family later learned for nearly a decade was called the 'Bridge to Nowhere,' crashing into Snow Creek, where he drowned," Zimmerman said.

As reported by AP, State troopers who found Paxson's body in his overturned and partially submerged truck had said there were no barriers or warning signs along the washed-out roadway. According to the lawsuit, he had driven off an unguarded edge and crashed about 20 feet below.

The suit also claims that Google had been notified about the collapsed bridge on multiple occasions before Paxson's death and had been urged to update its system. A Hickory resident used Maps' "suggest an edit" feature to warn Google about the collapsed bridge in 2020, and while the company said in an email that it was reviewing the suggestion, it took no further actions.

The lawsuit also names several private property management companies that were responsible for the land and surrounding plots where the crash happened. The original bridge developer's company had dissolved.

"We have the deepest sympathies for the Paxson family," Google spokesperson José Castañeda told the AP. "Our goal is to provide accurate routing information in Maps and we are reviewing this lawsuit."

Alicia Paxson, Philip Paxson's wife, said, "Our girls ask how and why their daddy died, and I'm at a loss for words they can understand because, as an adult, I still can't understand how those responsible for the GPS directions and the bridge could have acted with so little regard for human life."

Permalink to story.

 
While anyone driving a car is responsible for their own actions, Google has been allowed to skate on far too many occasions and does have some accountability. Let the suite go forward and let the 12 members of the jury decide.
 
I can't see how Google would be liable. However, the owner of the bridge, whether state or private might be liable if adequate measures were not taken to block access. If barricades and warnings were ignored, well, there is no liability claim. Since they are suing Google, it makes me think there were barricades and warnings that were ignored.
 
I found it. Bing Maps shows there definitely was a "Road Closed" sign previously in 2014: https://www.bing.com/maps?FORM=Z9LH2&cp=35.781173~-81.283444&lvl=17.9&pi=-10.2&style=x&dir=33.2

Google Maps shows there's significant debris here as of May of this year: https://www.google.com/maps/@35.781...FuQox7Ms6COmxnbw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

On the other side, Google Maps shows there was a road closure sign as of May 2019: https://www.google.com/maps/@35.782...6OoQEMYOhyb62sxA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

It doesn't seem any driver would have problems seeing this bridge was unpassable in every example I could find of it.
 
I found it. Bing Maps shows there definitely was a "Road Closed" sign previously in 2014: https://www.bing.com/maps?FORM=Z9LH2&cp=35.781173~-81.283444&lvl=17.9&pi=-10.2&style=x&dir=33.2

Google Maps shows there's significant debris here as of May of this year: https://www.google.com/maps/@35.781...FuQox7Ms6COmxnbw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

On the other side, Google Maps shows there was a road closure sign as of May 2019: https://www.google.com/maps/@35.782...6OoQEMYOhyb62sxA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

It doesn't seem any driver would have problems seeing this bridge was unpassable in every example I could find of it.
Nice finds.

New title should read:

Man drives through closed road barriers resulting in death, family sues Google for driver incompetence.
 
I found it. Bing Maps shows there definitely was a "Road Closed" sign previously in 2014: https://www.bing.com/maps?FORM=Z9LH2&cp=35.781173~-81.283444&lvl=17.9&pi=-10.2&style=x&dir=33.2

Google Maps shows there's significant debris here as of May of this year: https://www.google.com/maps/@35.781...FuQox7Ms6COmxnbw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

On the other side, Google Maps shows there was a road closure sign as of May 2019: https://www.google.com/maps/@35.782...6OoQEMYOhyb62sxA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

It doesn't seem any driver would have problems seeing this bridge was unpassable in every example I could find of it.

Seeing as this 'Murica... Insert Randy Marsh here...
I'm hearing road signs noted. Man commits suicide, either cause, well I would if I lived in N. Carolina... Or this is like suicide by Bridge.

Maybe he just watched several reruns of Dukes of Hazard, Smokey and the Bandit? Lil LSD added to the mix and you got a dumb....

Which I'm pretty sure I can say, seeing as his family are dumbasses thinking they will win this.
Red Foreman concurs.

Turns out I couldn't say the singular. Fk my life forums are so petty.
 
What can one do when *****s will be *****s. Was he blind folded while driving? I have heard of and negotiated blind corners but then one is supposed to ease off the gas and do so cautiously. How can anyone be so dumb to fall off a collapsed bridge like this?

The family and the lawyer who takes their case should be penalised for wasting court's and Google's time and money.
 
add in darkness and raining and that's a lawsuit for the city/property management.
But... but... "The original bridge developer's company had dissolved."
So Nothing can be done. With the company's gone, there's No One Left to fix it.
So sad....
 
"Tragically, as he drove cautiously in the darkness and rain, he unsuspectingly followed Google's outdated directions to what his family later learned for nearly a decade was called the 'Bridge to Nowhere,' crashing into Snow Creek, where he drowned,"

I'm going to call bs on the caution. Unless that bridge is immediately preceded by a blind crest, he would have stopped before he drove off if driving cautiously. He was likely distracted or staring at the phone while driving.
 
"Tragically, as he drove cautiously in the darkness and rain, he unsuspectingly followed Google's outdated directions to what his family later learned for nearly a decade was called the 'Bridge to Nowhere,' crashing into Snow Creek, where he drowned,"

I'm going to call bs on the caution. Unless that bridge is immediately preceded by a blind crest, he would have stopped before he drove off if driving cautiously. He was likely distracted or staring at the phone while driving.
Where I live, there are TONS of these small rural bridges that are long gone, collapsed, with a single orange closed sign in front of them.

somehow, us country bumpkins can figure out how NOT to drive into the river via GPS.
 
Something's not added up: bridge has been out for 9 years, and there were no warning signs on the bridge or the road leading up to it?!?

This is clearly something I don't understand and find utterly outrageous... How could they leave this collapsed bridge without any warning signs? For nearly 10 years? WTF?! Imagine driving towards this trap at night without any sign...
 
"Tragically, as he drove cautiously in the darkness and rain, he unsuspectingly followed Google's outdated directions to what his family later learned for nearly a decade was called the 'Bridge to Nowhere,' crashing into Snow Creek, where he drowned,"

I'm going to call bs on the caution. Unless that bridge is immediately preceded by a blind crest, he would have stopped before he drove off if driving cautiously. He was likely distracted or staring at the phone while driving.

Here's what I really wonder... How do they KNOW this? How do they KNOW that he "drove cautiously in the rain" and "unsuspectingly followed" the directions from Google? Was there a survivor that witnessed this? Not as far as I can see in the story... Or are they just formulating a story that fits their narrative, assuming what happened all leads towards Google being some kind of pied piper of death here? Seriously, I want to know what proof there is that he was being super careful and Google lured him to his doom? What if he saw there were issues (like signs in the area), ignored it and had the "I can make this" over-confident approach? Who's to say which story is true, if there were no witnesses to the actual event? This entire lawsuit is just full of reasonable doubt, and any lawyer willing to run with this has got to be an ambulance chaser that is just hoping Google will throw a few bucks towards them to shut them up.

Those responsible for maintenance and road upkeep in the area are far more liable for any damages than Google is.
 
I found it. Bing Maps shows there definitely was a "Road Closed" sign previously in 2014: https://www.bing.com/maps?FORM=Z9LH2&cp=35.781173~-81.283444&lvl=17.9&pi=-10.2&style=x&dir=33.2

Google Maps shows there's significant debris here as of May of this year: https://www.google.com/maps/@35.781...FuQox7Ms6COmxnbw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

On the other side, Google Maps shows there was a road closure sign as of May 2019: https://www.google.com/maps/@35.782...6OoQEMYOhyb62sxA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

It doesn't seem any driver would have problems seeing this bridge was unpassable in every example I could find of it.
I just heard the barricades were removed by vandals.

As in, whoever is responsible for the land didn't do their due diligence with either fixing the bridge, putting up something more permanent, or removing road access entirely...
 
Back