Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt wants to put data centers in space

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,709   +500
Staff
In brief: Eric Schmidt, best known as Google's CEO and public face during the early 2000s, has taken on a surprising new role. Several years after stepping away from Alphabet, Schmidt has acquired a controlling stake in aerospace manufacturer Relativity Space and is now serving as the company's CEO.

In his new role as CEO of Relativity Space, Eric Schmidt appears to be exploring the idea of launching data centers into Earth's orbit. During a recent congressional hearing, Schmidt discussed the future of AI and US competitiveness, emphasizing that the energy demands of massive data centers are already spiraling out of control.

At the hearing, Schmidt noted that an average US nuclear power plant generates around 1 gigawatt of power, yet some companies are now designing data centers that may require as much as 10 gigawatts. He warned that data centers could need an additional 29 gigawatts within just a few years, and up to 67 more gigawatts by 2030. "These things are industrial at a scale that I have never seen in my life," he said.

Space journalist Eric Berger speculated that Schmidt's acquisition of Relativity Space was likely driven by the ballooning energy needs of AI data centers. Schmidt later confirmed the assumption with a characteristically concise, one-word reply.

Indeed, the former Google chief is seriously considering using Relativity's rockets to deploy data centers in orbit – a move driven by the realization that Earth may not have enough power to sustain the exponential growth of generative AI.

Relativity Space was founded in 2015 as a private spaceflight company focused on additive manufacturing technology. The company is currently developing Terran R, a partially reusable, two-stage heavy-lift launch vehicle that is being built in part using 3D printing. Once completed, Terran R is expected to carry up to 33,500 kg of cargo into low-Earth orbit and return safely to the ground.

According to Schmidt, the only viable way to meet the exploding power demands of AI data centers is by harvesting solar energy directly in space. Acquiring control of Relativity Space gives him privileged access to one of the few independent aerospace companies still working on new rocket technology, at a time when SpaceX and Blue Origin are largely entwined with their billionaire founders' political fortunes and personal ambitions.

However, Schmidt's now-confirmed ambition to orbit data centers faces challenges that no company has yet solved. While theoretically possible, the concept may prove economically unfeasible – or even technically impossible – with current rocket capabilities. And if the AI bubble bursts, the energy crisis it's creating could vanish just as quickly.

Permalink to story:

 
Maybe we don't need so many data centers. Code has become less efficient and AI just uses way too much energy.

On top of the issues above, there are other things that we have to consider when we have these data centers in space. There is a lot more radiation and other cosmic stuff that Earth's magnetosphere protects us against that has to be accounted for. There is also the huge cost of sending stuff into LEO which will likely not be offset by the extra energy that can be harvested. You also have the huge downtime whenever the data center is behind Earth and is getting no energy from the sun.
 
What's the purpose of developing 33 tons rocket when SpaceX already has Falcon Heavy (63 tons) and Starship (100+ tons) will be fully operational before this Terran R?

Putting data centers in space requires solving plenty of complex challenges, why not skip the already solved ones?
 
Cooling could be rather difficult. Go look at the size of the EATCS panels when fully deployed on the ISS. They're massive and it still only has a maximum rejection capacity of about 70kw. That's basically a few server racks worth.
 
What's the purpose of developing 33 tons rocket when SpaceX already has Falcon Heavy (63 tons) and Starship (100+ tons) will be fully operational before this Terran R?

Putting data centers in space requires solving plenty of complex challenges, why not skip the already solved ones?


Real men have their own fabs rocket ships!

A bit more seriously, I am guessing that building the rockets themselves is Schmidt's first interest. Rockets are just cool. Developing a use for more launch capacity give you a reason to build more rocket ships, and the more you build the more economies of scale and ability to make incremental improvements kicks in. That has been a big part of SpaceX's success, developing its Starlink market which has given it a good & profitable reason to regularly launch more rockets.
 
Last edited:
What's the purpose of developing 33 tons rocket when SpaceX already has Falcon Heavy (63 tons) and Starship (100+ tons) will be fully operational before this Terran R?

Putting data centers in space requires solving plenty of complex challenges, why not skip the already solved ones?

Seems starship has some issues with it's thrusters. It can actually carry only 40000Kg LEO

One more space ship to serve the mankind
 
Seems absolutely stupid to me, getting rid of heat is a massive problem in space. Radiation wrecking equipment is a problem.

Lets say that somehow those problems are solved. Considering the massive amount of fuel needed to get things to space is there any chance this would somehow end up saving energy?

Seems like an idea by someone with more money than sense. But hey I'm no rocket scientist
 
Seems absolutely stupid to me, getting rid of heat is a massive problem in space. Radiation wrecking equipment is a problem.

Lets say that somehow those problems are solved. Considering the massive amount of fuel needed to get things to space is there any chance this would somehow end up saving energy?

Seems like an idea by someone with more money than sense. But hey I'm no rocket scientist

-100% this guy sounds like another memelord billionare. Maybe the idea here is to throw stupid but "cool sounding" **** at the walls to attract the low info venture capital class to bankroll a SpaceX competitor.

Anything that is difficult on earth is thousands of times more difficult in space. Heating/cooling/power generation/data transmission/upkeep/maintenance (anything in Earth orbit wants to fall out of orbit) and on and on and on.
 
It is depressing that the business leaders are so easily duped by what 'sounds' sophisticated, but is in fact a terrible idea. Wasting resources while other nations focus on solid advancement instead of what might make headlines.
 
What's the purpose of developing 33 tons rocket when SpaceX already has Falcon Heavy (63 tons) and Starship (100+ tons) will be fully operational before this Terran R?

Putting data centers in space requires solving plenty of complex challenges, why not skip the already solved ones?
Because if your payload can be managed with a 33 ton rocket, why pay a magnitude more for a 63 ton rocket launch?

Kinda like how we have F-150s, rangers, and mavericks.
-100% this guy sounds like another memelord billionare. Maybe the idea here is to throw stupid but "cool sounding" **** at the walls to attract the low info venture capital class to bankroll a SpaceX competitor.

Anything that is difficult on earth is thousands of times more difficult in space. Heating/cooling/power generation/data transmission/upkeep/maintenance (anything in Earth orbit wants to fall out of orbit) and on and on and on.
Devil's advocate, people thought you could never contain the atom, everyone swore Christopher Columbus was insane, and you could never make it to the moon either!
 
Back