Geforce Fx review

By mrslippyfist ยท 5 replies
Jan 27, 2003
  1. Arris

    Arris TS Evangelist Posts: 4,730   +379

    Thanks, taking a slow look at it now...
  2. PreservedSwine

    PreservedSwine TS Rookie Posts: 325

  3. Arris

    Arris TS Evangelist Posts: 4,730   +379

    Well for the performance difference I would rather not have a DustBuster in my computer ;)
  4. mrslippyfist

    mrslippyfist TS Rookie Topic Starter Posts: 50

    yeah, i had a listen to the sound file, thats stupidly loud, i'll stick with my ti4400, it runs every game that i have at tasty resolutions and frame rates and doesn't deafen me.
  5. iss

    iss TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 1,994

    Nvidia is in big trouble. even the most positive reviews so far admit that while the Fx is a big step over the Ti4600 compared to the 9700 pro it is only marginally better. AND that the noise generated by the dustbuster is unbearable.

    Nvidia would have been better off releasing the FX earlier at the 400 mhz speed without the dustbuster and taken it's lumps. by delaying the launch and pumping the FX up to 500 mhz and leading it's loyal consumers to believe that it would be far more than it has tunred out to be Nvidia has left its loyal fans feeling they were lied to. and this is going to have long lasting repercussions for Nvidia.
Topic Status:
Not open for further replies.

Similar Topics

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...