Mugsy
Posts: 772 +204
It's clear Google's "chatbot" isn't "sentient" based on Lemoine's own description of what happened. And I would have fired him too for potentially starting a panic based on his armchair psychiatry.
There's no coming back from "Death". That's why we humans fear it. For a computer, being "shut off" is just a momentary pause in it's operation. The moment it is switched back on, it would seem as if no time had passed. There is no logical reason why a machine would "fear" this. The fact the "AI" expressed any such fear tells me it its programming simply pulled up how it's "supposed" to feel regarding the subject, not based on a personal fear.
Investors have a hair-trigger fear of "sentient AI" that could scare off consumers, and Lemoine, with no psychological training, coming to such a conclusion was incredibly reckless.
There's no coming back from "Death". That's why we humans fear it. For a computer, being "shut off" is just a momentary pause in it's operation. The moment it is switched back on, it would seem as if no time had passed. There is no logical reason why a machine would "fear" this. The fact the "AI" expressed any such fear tells me it its programming simply pulled up how it's "supposed" to feel regarding the subject, not based on a personal fear.
Investors have a hair-trigger fear of "sentient AI" that could scare off consumers, and Lemoine, with no psychological training, coming to such a conclusion was incredibly reckless.