Google removes Android Wear from its store, but the platform isn't being killed off

By midian182 ยท 4 replies
Oct 6, 2017
Post New Reply
  1. Phones, speakers, cameras, laptops, Google made a number of new announcements earlier this week, but there was a conspicuous lack of anything relating to Android Wear. Yesterday, smartwatch fans panicked when the option to buy Android Wear devices was removed from the Google store.

    While LG’s Style and Sport smartwatches still appear in the store, both are now listed as no longer available. The change started speculation that this could signal the beginning of the end for the platform, but it turns out that Android Wear isn’t going away.

    Responding to a question on Twitter, Google employee Hoi Lam explained that the company decided it will only stock products either branded by Google or part of the “Made for Google” program on its online store.

    Lam went on to say that Google's store team had known about the plan for nearly a year. The company has been focusing on custom Android Wear storefronts with online retailers such as Amazon, while continuing to push the platform with its offline partner stores.

    “Our team knew the plant for a year now and invested in custom store fronts with online retailers e.g. Amazon. Together with all our partners (online/offline), we will reach more people all over the world than ever before,” wrote Lam.

    “When I visited partner stores in London and Shanghai, they couldn’t be more excited about our line-up this fall. On the technical front, I have more to share about how we think about updates – stay tuned!”

    So, while the launch of Android Wear 2.0 doesn’t seem to have done much to boost the popularity of smartwatches, it seems reports of its death were greatly exaggerated.

    Permalink to story.

  2. Skidmarksdeluxe

    Skidmarksdeluxe TS Evangelist Posts: 8,647   +3,279

    Android Wear may not have been killed off yet but the writing is on the wall. When last was a new Android smartwatch released apart from a few traditional watchmakers expensive attempts that are just far too niche? They're only trading on their names. Apple has the market on smartwatches and for good reason... Android Wear simply cannot match Apples iOS watch.
  3. Uncle Al

    Uncle Al TS Evangelist Posts: 3,995   +2,477

    Cool Hand Luke said it best ... "cut off the head and the body dies ..... "
  4. Invizibleyez

    Invizibleyez TS Enthusiast Posts: 68   +18

    I have no reason to believe that Apple has anything better going on, except you said so. So assuming that you are right, why does Apple insist on designing their watches to look like something that you get free with a happy meal? For centuries, watches have been jewelry, designed to look nice, or rugged, or elegant or expensive. Apple may have designed a decent smart watch system, but it still looks out of place in any true watch collection. For $50 I can find a much better looking watch at Walmart. Why would I spend $300+ for something that looks free?
  5. Skidmarksdeluxe

    Skidmarksdeluxe TS Evangelist Posts: 8,647   +3,279

    Why ask me? Only you can answer that.

Similar Topics

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...