You've cited a Wiki article link which doesn't work. It goes nowhere.
The proper link is here. That 2004 ruling was later and swiftly rendered invalid by other (multiple) rulings and pieces of case-law as reverse engineering is a known lawful practice and applies in the context of all personal, professional and commercial applications. The DMCA and anything associated generally yields to it. Read more
here,
here and
here.
You arguing against known and standing fair-use legal statute, case law and principle does not make you correct. While this subject and the legal details surrounding both are extremely complex and hotly debated, in the end, the law generally and specifically sides with the rights of the individual citizen.
Put simply, our rights as individual citizens completely over-rides conflicting terms stated in user agreements and conflicting law(and yes, there are a ton of laws that conflict each other, big shocker, right?) which has the effect of making them null, void and unenforceable.
So if you wish to continue abiding an ideal which is both invalid and ignorant to fact of reality, that's your thing. The rest of us will carry on exercising our known rights as we see fit.