We’re talking about less than a handful of games, so, generalizing much? For the rest of the games B580 puts the 4060 to shame, or so it seems. By the looks of it, most likely a driver issue of some sort.Look at the results in the article and HU testing, even a Ryzen 5700X3D experiences a pronounced slow-down in certain (high CPU utilisation) titles with the B580. This isn't just limited to people with potato CPUs from 5 years ago. It also makes the B580 significantly slower than the 4060 in many titles, which negates any reason to buy a B580 in my opinion given they are the same price.
The reality is that most B580 reviews which were done on 7800X3D/9800X3D processors (to remove the CPU bottleneck) are pretty misleading for the types of setups people actually buying a B580 will be using. People aren't buying $250 GPUs to pair with a $500 CPU, it is usually the other way around. If you have a Ryzen 7600-like CPU or slower, the B580 appears inferior to the 4060/7600.
A handful of games out of a handful of games tested. We don't know yet how extensive the issue will be, other than the greater the games CPU load (a trend that will only get worse with increasing number of UE5 Nanite and Lumen games) and the slower the processor the more severe the issue is. It may be a driver issue, though one that has seemingly existed since A750/770, however both cards were too low performant (and sold too poorly) to get the level of scrutiny required by tech media to identify and inform the wider public (some smaller YouTube reviewers did identify the issue). That doesn't strike me with confidence that Intel can fix it, it seems to be a fundamental aspect of the architecture and how it needs to be driven by the CPU.We’re talking about less than a handful of games, so, generalizing much? For the rest of the games B580 puts the 4060 to shame, or so it seems. By the looks of it, most likely a driver issue of some sort.
Besides a 5700x3d is not $500. More like $200. And it would deliver adequate performance even in that handful of games.
Buying a 4060 never made any sense. Even less now with the upcoming 5000 series.
A lot of speculation here.A handful of games out of a handful of games tested. We don't know yet how extensive the issue will be, other than the greater the games CPU load (a trend that will only get worse with increasing number of UE5 Nanite and Lumen games) and the slower the processor the more severe the issue is. It may be a driver issue, though one that has seemingly existed since A750/770, however both cards were too low performant (and sold too poorly) to get the level of scrutiny required by tech media to identify and inform the wider public (some smaller YouTube reviewers did identify the issue). That doesn't strike me with confidence that Intel can fix it, it seems to be a fundamental aspect of the architecture and how it needs to be driven by the CPU.
End of the day we need more data, but IMO it is enough to hold off buying a B580 until the issue is confirmed to be very isolated or it is fixed by Intel. Re: 4060, buying any GPU makes no sense just prior to 5060/9060 launches, B580 included.
Looks like intel got an architecture that scales well with CPU memory access latency... looks like even 9800x3d is not bottlenecked by b580... I wish intel just make an arc that is twice or thrice as powerful as B580 without worrying about power consumption...
?Where was 5600 mentioned in the article?That's honestly awful. Nobody should buy this if a 5600 can't extract 100% of its performance.
?Where was 5600 mentioned in the article?
You mean the problem that affected less than 1% of all sold stock and was completely mitigated with a BIOS update? That problem? Plus they offered extended warranties and free replacements even though they didn't have to? It only affected a rare few from the top end SKU's, which I have and it continues to run fine after over a year of constant operation and heavy usage.""Occasional problem"" like 2 entire generations of CPUs that explode