Intel faces crisis as revenue misses and a bleak forecast shakes investor confidence

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 579   +13
Staff
Bottom line: Intel's latest quarterly earnings were nothing short of ugly, prompting restructuring plans. It is quite the change for a company that was once among the 30 best stocks in the world. Analysts are increasingly skeptical about CEO Pat Gelsinger's ability to execute a successful turnaround, especially as Intel struggles to keep pace with AMD and Nvidia.

Intel is facing its most significant crisis in decades. The company's recent quarterly earnings report paints a grim picture, with revenue falling far short of expectations and a bleak forecast for the coming months.

It reported revenue of $12.83 billion, down 1% from the previous year, missing analyst expectations of $12.94 billion. It also lowered its forecast for the current quarter to between $12.5 billion and $13.5 billion, down from estimates of $14.35 billion.

"Our Q2 financial performance was disappointing, even as we hit key product and process technology milestones," CEO Pat Gelsinger said. "Second-half trends are more challenging than we previously expected, and we are leveraging our new operating model to take decisive actions that will improve operating and capital efficiencies."

In response to these financial challenges, Intel also announced a sweeping cost-reduction plan. The company aims to cut its workforce by over 15 percent by year-end, restructure operations, and slash operational expenses by more than $10 billion in the upcoming year. This plan includes a 20-percent reduction in capital expenditures, significant cuts to R&D, and discontinuing underperforming products.

The market reaction was swift and severe. Intel's shares plummeted 26 percent in a single day – the worst trading day for the company since 1974 – wiping out over $30 billion in market value. The stock closed at $21.48, its lowest point since 2013, raising questions about the company's ability to attract investors in the future.

It remains questionable whether investors will return, considering the stock has barely budged over the past 25 years. Kiplinger is calling it a "catastrophe" for long-term investors.

Intel's struggles stem from its failure to capitalize on major technological shifts. The company notably missed the mobile revolution and now lags behind Nvidia in the burgeoning field of generative AI.

"Intel's issues are now approaching the existential in our view," Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon said.

For example, Intel's Foundry division, responsible for over two-thirds of Intel's products and producing chips for third parties, saw its revenue slightly rise to $4.3 billion in the second quarter, compared to $4.2 billion in the same period last year. However, the unit's losses deepened to $2.8 billion, up from $1.9 billion in Q2 2023 and $2.5 billion in Q1 2024. These are substantial losses for a vital division and contributed significantly to Intel's financial struggles.

More to the point, the Foundry division is crucial to Intel's IDM 2.0 strategy and its efforts to compete with TSMC in the semiconductor foundry market. Its losses indicate challenges in this strategic transformation. Even worse, Intel expects the operating losses of its foundry business to peak in 2024 and aims to reach break-even operating margins by around 2027.

Perhaps not surprisingly, some investors and analysts now doubt whether CEO Pat Gelsinger can execute the expensive restructuring of Intel's operations that he initiated upon taking the helm in early 2021 when he vowed to restore the former prestige of the already faltering company. These plans significantly expand Intel's chip-manufacturing footprint by constructing new factories in Arizona, Oregon, Ohio, and Europe, costing tens of billions each. Concurrently, Intel aims to establish a business for contract chip manufacturing for external circuit designers, a field in which it had previously struggled to gain a foothold.

"Turnarounds in tech are not very easy," said Ivana Delevska, chief investment officer of asset manager Spear. "You really need to have a lot of things going for you, and it needs to come from the technology side. Leadership changes can only do so much."

Gelsinger says he is resolute in steering Intel back on course.

"We must improve our execution, adapt to new market realities and operate as a more agile company," he wrote in an email to employees after Thursday's earnings report. "That's the spirit of the actions we are taking – knowing that the choices we make today, as difficult as they are, will strengthen our ability to serve our customers and grow our business for years to come."

Permalink to story:

 
Intel has been doing quite well for the past thirty years or so. Where's the loyalty? I think I'll stick with them...
 
This plan includes a 20-percent reduction in capital expenditures, significant cuts to R&D, and discontinuing underperforming products.

A statement like this makes me wonder if Arc will get dropped.

Also, GN’s latest episode really was damning for Intel:


I can’t recommend an Intel CPU right now, and it will probably be awhile before I reconsider that position. This is the kind of screwup that can kill a company.
 
Is Intel too big to fail? I guess we'll see. But imagine how much worse this situation would be if Apple was still using them and MacBooks and Mac Pros started dying left and right
 
It is not in any tech enthusiast's interest for Intel to be stumbling so badly. We need their fabs, engineers, and other resources to be doing more productive things than they have been. And smaller scale, they need to find their way back to sanity on simpler things like how to treat customers who were sold defective CPUs too. The enthusiast class retail CPU may not be their most important market segment, but a lot of the people who make decisions about higher volume / higher price purchases for their career, are also enthusiasts in their personal life. Feel mistreated in one and you're likely to question Intel's role in the other too.
 
For years their approach was a golden goose in regards of funds. Anyone knows that intel "used" to sell fast or great processors, and in the enterprise market at least 80% was covered by intel products.

Oh but the tides are changing now. AMD is banging them on all fronts in both enterprise and consumer level, with a fraction of their R&D budget. Finally a battle that will benefit consumers.
 
To be fair “revenue of $12.83 billion, down 1% from the previous year, missing analyst expectations of $12.94 billion” is not ‘far’ below expectations.

Intel took too long to implement EUV after skylake and that is the root of all of its recent problems. With 18A almost complete, and 18A products coming next year, there still is a chance that power consumption is tamed and power efficiency of the Intel Lakes improve. If that happens and there are no more delays/degrading chips, income will stabilize (assuming there’s not another recession).

There still is time for the company to turn things around but the window of time is narrowing. Especially since ARM is emerging as a potent threat on client and data center. And AMD is firing on all cylinders. Sometimes you have to go through the fire 🔥 to then go thru a metamorphosis and transform into something new.

Time will tell if intel can transform in time or not. Apple’s decision to leave seems prescient at the moment.
 
Last edited:
Intel desperately needs a Dr. Lisa Su. I had hopes for Gelsinger but that hope is all but extinguished. When he came in, he recognized that his predecessor had cut engineering staff and that was the reason they fell behind AMD. Now a scant 3 years later he is cutting R&D. They seem to be falling further behind AMD. Dr. Su saved AMD from extinction, worked on shoestring budgets and was able to turn the ship around for both processors and graphic processors. There must be another one of her out there somewhere or perhaps AMD and Intel can merge to strengthen and fortify the x86 platform. While that would not be good from an x86 platform competition perspective... it would be good for the x86 platform as a whole. That would only work if SHE was in charge of running things. Intel needs to clear out the c-suite. Intel needs a a corporate culture reboot. I am not yet convinced Intel's new process nodes are going as well as Gelsinger has been advertising. I desperately want Intel to succeed. Im just not sure if current leadership is up to the task. Gelsinger is definitely better than his predecessor and they definitely NEED an engineer running the show versus a clueless MBA
 
Karma is a b1tch, Intel. Perhaps you should not have tried to pull so much BS on your customers over the years.
And partners, competitors, regulators…

While I don‘t feel sorry for them the least bit, I don‘t want them to go under either.

We need Intel to stay around in the budget segment (sub $150) to keep AMD honest and leave Dell with processors to put into their systems.
 
It is not in any tech enthusiast's interest for Intel to be stumbling so badly. We need their fabs, engineers, and other resources to be doing more productive things than they have been. And smaller scale, they need to find their way back to sanity on simpler things like how to treat customers who were sold defective CPUs too. The enthusiast class retail CPU may not be their most important market segment, but a lot of the people who make decisions about higher volume / higher price purchases for their career, are also enthusiasts in their personal life. Feel mistreated in one and you're likely to question Intel's role in the other too.
No we don't need them. We don't need their fabs, all their other ventures are failures beside CPUs and now they are screwing their customers by refusing RMAs because they have thrown power at the problem for beating their competition.

You reap what you sow...
 
To be fair “revenue of $12.83 billion, down 1% from the previous year, missing analyst expectations of $12.94 billion” is not ‘far’ below expectations.

Intel took too long to implement EUV after skylake and that is the root of all of its recent problems. With 18A almost complete, and 18A products coming next year, there still is a chance that power consumption is tamed and power efficiency of the Intel Lakes improve. If that happens and there are no more delays/degrading chips, income will stabilize (assuming there’s not another recession).

There still is time for the company to turn things around but the window of time is narrowing. Especially since ARM is emerging as a potent threat on client and data center. And AMD is firing on all cylinders. Sometimes you have to go through the fire 🔥 to then go thru a metamorphosis and transform into something new.

Time will tell if intel can transform in time or not. Apple’s decision to leave seems prescient at the moment.
You are missing the point... Intel is subsidize by the chip act, and even with all that money, they can't even break even. Not only this, but they can't seem to be able to capitalize on AI.

Not to mention all the mess with IFS and now their CPU design flaws.

They cut dividends pal, you know it is bad when you need to cut dividends. It is usually a sign of the beginning of the end when you are cutting dividends.
 
No we don't need them. We don't need their fabs, all their other ventures are failures beside CPUs and now they are screwing their customers by refusing RMAs because they have thrown power at the problem for beating their competition.

You reap what you sow...

If you think AMD won't engage in abusive tactics if they lose their only real competitor, you're very wrong. Intel needs to remain a strong competitor or everyone loses very badly.
 
I liked their solution:
There will be less concurrency if the used Cpus fails in a few months. Time enough to launch a new LGA socket.
 
I wonder how much Pat the Rat likes the taste of humble pie. Some of his statements have been breathtakingly arrogant. Not so cocky now are you!
 
You are missing the point... Intel is subsidize by the chip act, and even with all that money, they can't even break even. Not only this, but they can't seem to be able to capitalize on AI.

Not to mention all the mess with IFS and now their CPU design flaws.

They cut dividends pal, you know it is bad when you need to cut dividends. It is usually a sign of the beginning of the end when you are cutting dividends.
How much money of the chips act has intel received? How much of the total that it received has been deployed ? How much of the chips act money can be used for operations/marketing/salaries vs construction of foundry ?

If you look intel’s Q2 revenue all its businesses except foundry had a net profit. Foundry is what is currently dragging them down. But they are spending billions on finally deploying EUV. Once the EUV products arrive we have to see how they perform in terms performance and perf/watt. If Intel can get its power consumption in check and can release new power efficient products at a regular cadence, it could come back.

The problem we’re seeing today is a failure to implement EUV sooner. That is why AMD and Apple surged ahead. However, by eliminating their competitor’s competitive advantage (in terms of manufacturing node), the company has a window of opportunity to come back before it’s too late. I say let’s examine the situation in Q3 2025.
 
Last edited:
Back