Intel proposes new modular standards for laptops and mini PCs to improve repairability

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,876   +49
Staff
Forward-looking: Outdated laptops often necessitate complete replacements since they typically only allow users to upgrade memory or storage. Intel aims to address this issue by urging manufacturers to embrace new modular design standards. Like Framework and MNT PCs, these standards would allow users to upgrade motherboards and other components without purchasing a new laptop.

Intel recently outlined its ideas for allowing users to upgrade and replace individual laptop components. If widely adopted, the new standards could reduce costs and e-waste.

The company's proposal describes standardized measurements for future laptop motherboards and I/O modules. Following a clear set of parameters might speed up the design process for new components.

Additionally, users could upgrade and replace boards, USB-C ports, Thunderbolt ports, and other parts without completely replacing the laptop. An affordable tier for mainstream laptops would accommodate 14- and 16-inch devices, enabling single- or dual-fan upgrades to improve cooling.

Intel also envisions strengthening modularity and standardization for mini-PCs. The company's diagram (below) depicts a 5L chassis with slide rails to facilitate easy swapping of the CPU, memory, GPU, and storage. The I/O ports and other parts would also enable easy repairs.

Framework and MNT have provided modular laptops for years, but their initiatives remain niche. Framework's products allow customers to swap mainboards, ports, screens, keyboards, and many other components. The company also aims to provide upgradeable dedicated graphics for its 16-inch laptop, but the AMD Radeon RX 7700S is the only available option so far.

Meanwhile, MNT recently unveiled the successor to its Arm-based Reform laptop. Owners of the prior model can upgrade to a new SoC, swap other components, and 3D print a new chassis.

The primary downside of Framework and MNT devices is that upgrades require users to remain within each company's hardware ecosystem. In contrast, Intel's proposal could potentially create an environment resembling desktop DIY PCs, allowing users to choose between parts from numerous vendors. However, whether the industry would agree upon a single modular laptop standard remains uncertain.

Wide adoption wouldn't just lower upgrade costs and reduce e-waste; it would also deliver right-to-repair advocates a major victory. The increasingly popular movement aims to resist manufacturers' efforts to block repairs and maintenance by users or third-party hardware vendors. Right-to-repair advocacy usually centers on machines like smartphones and tractors, but laptop users have also begun complaining about recent models that no longer allow RAM and SSD upgrades.

Permalink to story:

 
I can't imagine Chinese mini-pc brands choosing to follow Intels lead. They're constantly coming out with new designs of their own. Parts are replaceable. I don't think this will be widely adopted, even if approved as a standard.
 
Idea is good. However as we have seen, laptop and server users are much more stupid than desktop users so I doubt those lower rank users will care at all.
 
However as we have seen, laptop and server users are much more stupid than desktop users so I doubt those lower rank users will care at all.
That's not really the issue. Stupid people will buy whatever is presented to them. This will never be presented to them as a buying option, because there's much more profit to be made from selling someone a whole new laptop instead of replacing just one part of it.
 
That's not really the issue. Stupid people will buy whatever is presented to them. This will never be presented to them as a buying option, because there's much more profit to be made from selling someone a whole new laptop instead of replacing just one part of it.
But those people are stupid because they don't demand better. Just like we see on OEM side. People complain how they are not offered laptops with AMD CPU/APU? Well, they probably are stupid enough not to realize that they could make demands for OEM: either offer AMD or we will buy from someone else. Desktop users do just that, if shop A does not offer AMD, then they buy from shop B. Simple.
 
So, after two decades of pressuring the markets on making AIO non replaceable nor serviceable PCs they suddenly call everyone to return to sane practices of quarter of a century ago, replaceable and serviceable everything. A little too little too late IMHO.
 
I like the idea of it, but I think it's success will depend on it's implementation. Framework seems cool, but they don't have enough options in screen size, gpu upgrades, or even features like touchscreens. If Intel doesn't take it to the next level then they will only be fighting for Framework's market share.
 
I like the idea of it, but I think it's success will depend on it's implementation. Framework seems cool, but they don't have enough options in screen size, gpu upgrades, or even features like touchscreens. If Intel doesn't take it to the next level then they will only be fighting for Framework's market share.

Plus Framework has absolute garbage tier support sooooo….

Seriously, people are waiting 1-month+ on RMAs and their BIOS update history is lacking to say the least

I’m going to spend the next week or so selling mine, I’m that dissatisfied

I’d rather own something like my wife’s $500 HP special that I bought off some random Newegg seller
 
"Intel proposes new modular standards for laptops and mini PCs to improve repairability - but it will not be approved and thus this article is just clickbait"

There, fixed the title for you :)
 
The idea makes a whole lotta sense, but as mentioned above its success will depend on the details of implementation. "However, whether the industry would agree upon a single modular laptop standard remains uncertain."
This is the key question. Notice how long it takes the industry to adapt to a new USB standard, etc. And I can't see Apple adopting something like this. The will want to embrace their own inhouse design ideas to retain (expensive) exclusivity.
 
How Standards Proliferate
Situation: There are 14 competing standards. 14? Ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standards that covers everyone's use cases! Result: There are 15 competing standards

I love some XKCD lol
https://xkcd.com/927/
 
Back