my expectations of Ivy Bridge was taken from the leaked CPU specifications and how they said it could line up against existing Sandy Bridge processors back in approx. May '11.
Most of what is known actually begins and ends
with a couple of slides. After that it is all conjecture.
None of which has any bearing on SB-E directly...
Bear in mind that your SB platform has the upgrade path of:
2600K > possibly a faster 2700+K > Ivy Bridge (4C/8T)
The upgrade path for SB-E
3960X/3930K > C2 stepping + speed bin increases > Ivy Bridge-E (up to 10C/20T)
I wonder how the temps would fair Vs SB under water,
Again,
The extreme crowd won't be setting any OC records with SB-E...I thought I'd already made that clear. Likewise do you think your 2600K platform can:
Run quad-SLI ?
Run triple GPU and still have full I/O functionality?
Equal or better a SB-E in Vantage, 3DMark11, WPrime32 or any other accepted performance benchmark ?
If you were to overclock, I doubt you would go beyond 4.4GHz if your running it as a workstation for stability (to guarantee stability you obviously wouldn't overclock).
Firstly, OC depends on the platform and the particular CPU. I've already provided a link to show that SB-E isn't the world's best overclocker, so what's the point?
The world's best overclocker is an AMD part. Care to state how many HWBot benchmarks a FX-8150 would win over the 3960X ? or for that matter, substitute a 2700K for the 8150.
If absolute clockspeed is the defining pinnacle of performance then every enthusiast should be going for Bulldozer since SB is capped at a 57 multiplier.
Seems you need to read every review to see how each motherboard fairs with overclocking (mixed success apparently from when I was speed reading yesterday).
Allow me:
Intel DX79SI low: 4.3 (Hardware Secrets) - High - 4.9 (Hardware Canucks)
Also: 4.4 (HT4U), 4.5 (Overclockers.com, Xbit), 4.6 (Technic3D, Legit Reviews, Hardcore Hardware, Hardware France, Tom's Hardware), 4.7 (PC Perspective, Madshrimps), ), 4.73 (OCC), 4.75 (Hot Hardware), 4.8 (HiTech Legion, ComputerBase, Tech Report)
Asus Rampage IV Extreme : low 4.6 (eTeknik), High: 5 (Tweaktown, OC3D, OCLab.pl) Also: 4.7 (VR-Zone), 4.8 (Kitguru, HardOCP)
Gigabyte Assassin2 : low: 4.4 (TechSpot) High: 4.6 (Tweaktown)
Gigabyte X79-UD7 : 4.77 (Sin's Hardware)
Gigabyte X79-UD5 : 4.8 (Tech Report)
Asus P9X79 Pro: 4.5 (Xbit)
Asus Sabertooth X79: low 4.7 (bit-tech), high: 4.9 (Madshrimps)
MSI X79-GD65: low: 4.7 (Tech Report), high: 5 (Guru3D)